Posted on 01/26/2015 8:56:30 AM PST by John Semmens
President Obama hailed the 42nd anniversary of 1973’s Supreme Court decision legalizing abortion at any time for any reason throughout a woman’s pregnancy.
“Since 1973 over 50 million unwanted births have been prevented,” Obama pointed out. “That’s 50 million mothers spared the toils and troubles of rearing children they did not want. That’s 50 million individuals spared the indignity of being an unwanted child.”
The President also took this anniversary as an opportunity to call for “continued vigilance against those who would have us backtrack on this vital human right.” Two instances of “backtracking” as the President sees it are HR36 (the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act) and HR7 (No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act).
As Obama sees it “the evil of HR36 is that it would elevate an undue concern for the momentary pain suffered by a late term aborted fetus to a level that could neutralize the right given to all women by the 1973 Supreme Court decision.”
“The equally pernicious HR7 would relieve taxpayers from bearing their fair share of the burden of financing abortions,” the President added. “Once a right has been decreed it is everyone’s responsibility to support its full implementation. No woman should have to pay an out-of-pocket expense in order to exercise her right to an abortion. No person should be allowed to cite discredited moral objections in an effort to avoid paying for it.”
In related news, Sens. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn) and Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis) have introduced a bill aimed at “preventing states from getting out of step with national policy on abortion.” “Abortion is too crucial an issue for us to allow individual states to deviate from the path set by our President,” Blumenthal argued. “If the Supreme Court has ruled that any woman is entitled to an abortion for any reason how can we sit back and allow states to chip away at that right? Contentions that restrictions are intended to spare the fetus pain have no standing. The Court didn’t provide for an exception in the case of pain to the fetus. We must not allow states to try to sneak restrictions on abortion into their laws via an illegitimate concern for fetuses’ so-called rights.”
if you missed any of this week's other semi-news/semi-satire posts you can find them at...
http://azconservative.org/2015/01/24/white-house-outraged-over-boehner-invitation-to-netanyahu/
“The magnificent, podium, from which I deliver these remarks to you on this historic day, was built using more than fifty-five million bricks. As I look out through these majestic windows, I can see a the lovely horizon, almost ninety miles away.”
President Obama hailed the 42nd anniversary of 1973’s Supreme Court decision legalizing abortion at any time for any reason throughout a woman’s pregnancy.
He also went on to say, “the democrat party is all about killing us some babies...we kill em at any age for any reason and for no reason. We love to kill us some babies, in fact, we have never met an unborn baby that we don’t think needs some kill’n.”
The President also said; “if you were irresponsible and got pregnant because you were just too stupid or too lazy to use contraception, not to worry, the democrats will ensure that we kill your baby at no cost to you...so in addition to not having to take any responsibility for your life you also have no absolutely no responsibility for killing the unborn life growing inside you, we the democrats will kill it for you free.”
Now, isn’t that HOPE you can believe in?
In no way do I endorse abortion, but I can’t escape thinking how much better we would be had Obama been aborted.
Sorry, I said it.
And I mean it.
Brilliant but not satire. This is how modern day leftists truly think and behave.
Nearly 50 million women able to avoid being “punished with a baby”...
It's a weird situation. Conservatives are fighting for the lives of babies whose mothers are most likely democrat supporters and are a burden on society and will probably raise their children to be the same.
He was conceived 10 years too soon. I think his own mother wrote that if Barry had been born after Roe v. Wade.....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.