Any Senator who would vote for lawlessness should be removed!
Posted on 01/29/2015 7:02:28 PM PST by Steelfish
JANUARY 29, 2015 Resist the Lynch Nomination By The Editors
In November, just days after the American electorate gave Republicans strong majorities in both chambers of Congress, President Obama thumbed his nose at several million voters by issuing an executive order effectively granting amnesty to 5 million–plus immigrants residing in the United States illegally. That lawless action was, naturally, supported by Attorney General Eric Holder, whose primary contribution as head of the Department of Justice for six years has been to grant specious legal imprimatur to the president’s various usurpations of legislative power.
Loretta Lynch, U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of New York, nominated to be Mr. Holder’s replacement, has proven herself equally unfit for the office. That some Senate Republicans seem prepared to swiftly confirm her to office is an abnegation of their November mandate and, even more important, their constitutional duty.
(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...
BUMP. IMPORTANT.
Full stop. Just resisting isn’t enough.
Sadly, most Republicans will vote yes.
Q: "Do you think it's Constitutional for the government to lethally drone strike an American citizen ON AMERICAN SOIL who poses no imminent danger?"
Same as Holder, she would NOT answer 'no' to this question.
“No” is proper.
It’s a sure Bet she’s in .
Her connection to Holder’s wife here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3252063/posts?page=20
Any Senator who would vote for lawlessness should be removed!
Eric The Red in drag. Not just no, but HELL NO!
“Standing athwart history, shouting ‘Stop!’.”
Good old BB. We miss you, Mr. Bill.
“Do you think it’s Constitutional for the government to lethally shoot an American citizen ON AMERICAN SOIL who poses no imminent danger?”
If the Repubs pass her, that is it for me with the GOP.
Period.
They’re cowering in fear for being called rasis.
It’s too bad, but the Republican wing of Uniparty would confirm Gus Hall so as not to look like bad guys.
Did I say Gus Hall? I meant to say Quanell X. There that’s more accurate.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.