Posted on 03/18/2015 7:08:33 PM PDT by Impala64ssa
Irony of the chief putting on us a “racism monitoring device” for sake of peace. There is a fine line between growing to know people and hating oneself for failing as a Stat Buck “customer/worker”. How is the device callibered? And who is the callibrator?
If people behaved and were somewaphat scientific as opposed to gay emotional like in preferences, maybe this whole thing of race and “human equality” would not be a problem. This stuff reeks of redistributionism and using equality as a word, indeed, to prevent anyone questioning the “superiority” of the NOW COW... a sort of established ranking system having precedence over true judgment of quality and history.
This in effect is essentially a spun out racist system. Much like it would be offensive for a biggot to imply that only blacks should be gay, nowadays we say it is offensive to tell a black not to be gay! In the same hypocrite PC Dr. Spock politics having replaced real discipline, Star Bucks is simply saying to accomodate people for their own personal racial sensitivities in spoiling ways, inherently prostituting the Star Bucks worker to make the customer pay for the crappy product by removing self introspection.
We have here again gross greed and profit making from the dead or dying, motivating illegal immigration, crime and self destructive misbehavior after taking their moneys,
Speaking of NOW COW, there was this anchor woman interviewing a mathematician and she seemed pretty proud that she knew nothing about math yet was an empowered woman nonetheless, capable of asking or extracting answers about what math researchers do. But then she asked him in threatening/inquisitive manner as to why very few women study math, as if it was his fault for not allowing women in.
So baiscally she is the one inciting an ignorant racist empowered form of womanhood, no matter her intelligence or work, spoiling women, yet she accuses him implicitly of being the cause of this unjustice, not doing enough.
Surprizingly he replied somewhat ambiguously. (ie. He plaid the teacher who lets students cheat so as to set them up for failure.) He simply said that when schools were gender segregated, there simply were more women doing math because they had a woman-only classrooms. In effect, because of co-ed, there simply was no incentive anymore to use the stick on women in order to perform in research domain, in order to fill the classrooms, and they were relegated to rely on the guy.
So, he never went directly about her stupid Alinsky like attack, he simply oriented her back to the narcissist circular/loop argument about gender accomodation issues.
You must be kidding. There are loads of liberal men; now, and down through history: Soviet communism, Chinese communism, Cambodian, national socialists in Germany, the left in the United States, I could go on and on...
You know what was good about Cotton’s letter to Iran? It was relatively short, to the point, and it had paragraphs in it.
it’s a burned-tasting coffee desert.
I have an idea!
Lets get to the point where no one cares about skin color by focusing every waking moment on skin color!
Seriously, that’s how backward this whole thing is.
I was saying it in gist and being sarcastic.
Look at the land scape of liberal men, think about it.
On a broader scope we have been indoctrinated by the lie that liberals are for the poor people, but if anyone were to actually open their eyes and look at white liberal leaders, celebrities, politicians ?
They are snobby, snarky, arrogant rich folk, with a elitist , preveliged, superior attitude.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.