Posted on 05/05/2015 7:54:08 PM PDT by massmike
I’m more inclined to be outraged that there are social science researchers who actually expect adolescents to answer that kind of survey honestly so that they’ll have valid data for social science research. Don’t they remember being 14 or 15 themselves?
Lunchroom conversation the day the survey was given:
“Yeah . . . and I said I’d have sex with more than six people and always carry a gun!”
“So did I!”
Loud guffawing all around, at the table of guys, while the shy girl at the next table who actually regularly has sex with her steady boyfriend, but answered all the questions as if she were a virgin because she was afraid the survey wasn’t really anonymous averts here eyes.
Only one of the above is sexual, having the natural purpose of the procreative exchange of genetic material The other two are nothing but mutual masturbation -- selected by perverts who worship themselves and their abomination of Nature.
The evolution of sexual reproduction describes how sexually reproducing eukaryotic organisms (animals, plants and fungi) evolved from a common ancestor that was a single celled eukaryotic species.[1][2][3] Many protists reproduce sexually, as do multicellular plants, animals, and fungi. There are a few species which have secondarily lost this feature, such as Bdelloidea and some parthenocarpic plants. The evolution of sex contains two related, yet distinct, themes: its origin and its maintenance....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_of_sexual_reproduction
They teachin' those FACTS in school?
Once upon a time, schools were low-budget places where the children were educated in grammar, civics and math. Now schools are indoctrination camps run by deviants obsessed with every type of perversion for 1000X the money - as literacy, civility and knowledge of math declines.
Nothing surprises me anymore.
I now call them “pubic” schools.
So they want to ask and introduce to kids 12 years old or younger to such ideas as,
I am transgender and I think of myself as really a boy or man;
I am transgender and I think of myself as really a girl or woman;
I am transgender and I think of myself in some other way;
sexual intercourse (oral, anal, vaginal);
during the past 3 months, with how many people;
No wonder,
Many teachers uncomfortable with the surveys We have spoken with teachers in Massachusetts who have told us that they are pressured by schools to present the surveys to kids as if it were a normal procedure, and to not to discourage them from taking it. But some teachers do rebel against that. A parent in Canton, Mass., told us that a two years ago a teacher in that town was disciplined for telling his students they had a constitutional right to decline the survey. In 2010 a teacher in Illinois was also reprimanded for that (which was reported in the Chicago Tribune).
Parents and others need to stop this! It’s been our experience that the people who do this have no interest whatsoever in how this affects children or their families. From the politicians and the activists down to the school officials, it’s mostly about money, ideology, politics, and control. Even when the obvious and harmful flaws are pointed out, there is no effort to change. It will take angry parents and citizens to stop this. That’s why MassResistance filed Bill H382 in the Massachusetts Legislature which will completely empower parents. The fight begins!
Thanks for posting this. Related: http://www.firstthings.com/web-exclusives/2015/05/gordon-college-winsand-loses
President Lindsay of Gordon College is a great guy and Gordon is an important evangelical institution of higher learning. I’m delighted that the Administration and Board of Gordon College has not eliminated a prohibition of “homosexual practice” from its Life and Conduct Statement in the face of an unwarranted accreditation attack.
Nevertheless, the present situation does not appear to me to be as rosy as David French (a lawyer who has advised President Lindsay and Gordon College) depicted it in his May 1 National Review online article, “Gordon College Keeps Its Faith and Its Accreditation.”...
These concessions include the following:
(1) Deferential recognition of advocates of sexual heresy at Gordon. I had thought that only a tiny minority of Gordon’s faculty, staff, and students were supporting a change in the sexuality standard. So I had hoped that the governing authorities at Gordon would have rejected advocacy of homosexual unions as being every bit as inconsistent with continued association with the College as advocacy of consensual incest, polyamory, adultery, and fornication.
Instead, we only read: “The Board . . . clearly recognizes that the campus and Gordon’s constituents are not of one mind on this topic.” Why are proponents of homosexuality being given such legitimacy? Has the train already left the station? ...
The bottom line today is....we no longer “Protect” our children.
Have not seen these surveys in Texas yet. But will be keeping a closer eye on it.
Thanks.
Just sent out to my e-maillist!
Take control of them BACK!!!
It's simple enough to merely change the SPACING of letters and such to give each student a unique questionnaire.
No need for VISIBLE barcodes at all!
Did your family watch the interview, TOGETHER, and discuss Bruce’s responses afterward?
I disagree for five reasons:
1) Children should not be used as frontline soldiers in the culture wars. Children shouldn't be used as missionaries, either. This is work for adult men and women who are solidly grounded in their cultural, political, and religious worldview.
2) Subjecting children to the government schools means that they will be in a non-stop godless environment. They **will** learn to think and reason godlessly if they are to cooperate in the classroom. They risk learning to compartmentalize their religious faith. How could it possibly be otherwise?
3) Children in the government's single-payer schools risk learning to be comfortable with socialism. If the voting mob can give the child tuition-free schooling, can't that same voting mob be used to get **lots** of free stuff?
4) All of the above is child abuse. Children should be abused.
5) Government schooling is a single-payer and socialist-entitlement. When in the history of humankind has it been possible to “take back” a single-payer and socialist entitlement?
Sitting here laughing! :-)
Pubic schools? .....Good!
Yes, we no longer protect children for reasons I listed in post #55.
I just remember a news story about two boys who wrote political incorrect responses to race questions on the “secret” survey and got suspended.
I forbid my sons from answering any self incriminating or privacy questions from government officials without an attorney or their parents present. That was when we had a constitution.
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda or moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
It’s frigging sick and why are the parents who know about this not causing such a ruckus and going to the media?
Our public school system is irretrievably broken.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.