Posted on 06/08/2015 12:40:24 PM PDT by rightistight
It’s the same agenda they’ve spouted for 45 years. Smash the patriarchy. Smash monogamy. And NOW helped...
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3200158/posts
Marxist Feminism’s Ruined Lives
Frontpagemag.com ^ | 9-2-2014 | Mallory Millett
“When women go wrong men go right after them.” – Mae West
“Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy; its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.” Winston Churchill wrote this over a century ago.
During my junior year in high school, the nuns asked about our plans for after we graduated. When I said I was going to attend State University, I noticed their disappointment. I asked my favorite nun, “Why?” She answered, “That means you’ll leave four years later a communist and an atheist!”
What a giggle we girls had over that. “How ridiculously unsophisticated these nuns are,” we thought. Then I went to the university and four years later walked out a communist and an atheist, just as my sister Katie had six years before me.
Sometime later, I was a young divorcee with a small child. At the urging of my sister, I relocated to NYC after spending years married to an American executive stationed in Southeast Asia. The marriage over, I was making a new life for my daughter and me. Katie said, “Come to New York. We’re making revolution! Some of us are starting the National Organization of Women and you can be part of it.”
I hadn’t seen her for years. Although she had tormented me when we were youngsters, those memories were faint after my Asian traumas and the break-up of my marriage. I foolishly mistook her for sanctuary in a storm. With so much time and distance between us, I had forgotten her emotional instability.
And so began my period as an unwitting witness to history. I stayed with Kate and her lovable Japanese husband, Fumio, in a dilapidated loft on The Bowery as she finished her first book, a PhD thesis for Columbia University, “Sexual Politics.”
It was 1969. Kate invited me to join her for a gathering at the home of her friend, Lila Karp. They called the assemblage a “consciousness-raising-group,” a typical communist exercise, something practiced in Maoist China. We gathered at a large table as the chairperson opened the meeting with a back-and-forth recitation, like a Litany, a type of prayer done in Catholic Church. But now it was Marxism, the Church of the Left, mimicking religious practice:
“Why are we here today?” she asked.
“To make revolution,” they answered.
“What kind of revolution?” she replied.
“The Cultural Revolution,” they chanted.
“And how do we make Cultural Revolution?” she demanded.
“By destroying the American family!” they answered.
“How do we destroy the family?” she came back.
“By destroying the American Patriarch,” they cried exuberantly.
“And how do we destroy the American Patriarch?” she replied.
“By taking away his power!”
“How do we do that?”
“By destroying monogamy!” they shouted.
“How can we destroy monogamy?”
Their answer left me dumbstruck, breathless, disbelieving my ears. Was I on planet earth? Who were these people?
“By promoting promiscuity, eroticism, prostitution and homosexuality!” they resounded.
They proceeded with a long discussion on how to advance these goals by establishing The National Organization of Women. It was clear they desired nothing less than the utter deconstruction of Western society. The upshot was that the only way to do this was “to invade every American institution. Every one must be permeated with ‘The Revolution’”: The media, the educational system, universities, high schools, K-12, school boards, etc.; then, the judiciary, the legislatures, the executive branches and even the library system.
It fell on my ears as a ludicrous scheme, as if they were a band of highly imaginative children planning a Brinks robbery; a lark trumped up on a snowy night amongst a group of spoiled brats over booze and hashish...
Nope, if Margaret Sanger had her way, there would be NO MORE BABIES in the West (not just among minorities).
Choice has nothing to do with their campaign of death.
Cambodia coming to terms with thousands of forced marriages under Pol Pot
Is that by Dan Ratherbiased?
In Ayers’ 9-11-2001 NYTimes interview he admits to partner swapping and engaging in homosexual experiences with male members of the Weather Underground to “Smash Monogamy”.
That he also raped isn’t a surprise.
bump
Uh hummada hummada hummada hummada....
Irresistably hot.
Although, admittedly, the article seems to be more about homos....
If Yale is simply giving away PhD’s, I’d like one. Is there an address to write to?
Johari, huh? If I didn’t notice she *wasn’t* wearing a top, I would have mistaken her for one of my friends :-)
I don’t get it—black celebrities before, say 1990, were a lot more appealing to the public at large. I could run off a list of great black celebrities, both male and female.
If they were anything like the racists that we deal with now, they didn’t show it in public, at least.
They were simply classier back then. I would like to think that even some of them would have condemned the recent rioting, &c. (Those that remain alive, alas, have sold out to the race-baiters)
I was using shorthand to say that straight men I met in NYC often did not have any interests in the arts. Luckily, I met a man who was straight with loved all three and then introduced me to opera.
The best line I have seen on public school socialization, is that if a homeschooling family wants to emulate the public school socialization process, they should take their kid to the bathroom, blow smoke in his face, beat him up, and take his lunch money.
But crossing that last bridge (ballet) is not one I'm likely to take. I would guess few straight men would. But good for you if you found a man that likes all three.
I think I’ll go to a Beyonce concert backstage and find out. Wait a minute, I’d have listen to the music. Too high of a price to hit that. Sorry Beyonce.
Yes, agreed. But I was addressing a particular line in the article:
...if you do not find people of color attractive, you are a "sexual racist."
Straight men go to the theater. They may go with their wives (if Lincoln Center is anything to go on). Ballet is a gorgeous art form - and eye-candy for men. Or at least it should be.
In an example of perfect liberal hypocrisy the leftard who runs this blog:
http://vikingkitties.blogspot.com/2015/06/and-now-this-word-from-outer-space_9.html
...called me out and said that I was describing teenagers in general and not just black teenagers.
In short: “Boys will be boys so what are you complaining about?”
I posted on his blog (and we’ll see if he leaves my posts there) that he’s endorsed sexual harassment and that he’s victimizing the victim.
Making him a perfect liberal hypocrite.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.