Oregon imposes gag order on Christian bakers in gay wedding case

Canada Free Press ^ | 07/03/15 | Dan Calabrese

[Sherman Logan]

[The law] ban[s] people from acting on behalf of a place of public accommodation to communicate anything to the effect that the place of public accommodation would discriminate.

I be confused.

The "place of public accommodation" in question is supposedly their bakery, which I understand is no longer in operation.

If it's out of business, how can they discriminate?

[FredZarguna]

would discriminate.

Sounds like you could be fined for a pure hypothetical.

[Albion Wilde]

You’re the one who is not getting it. Any grocery store can make a plain cake. The very reason people go to artisan bakers is to receive their artisanship. Take a look at her web site. Her cakes are works of art.

Leftist hate, and find any excuse to kill other people’s joy.

[semaj]

"They have four little kids."

That complicates things.

[Sherman Logan]

If there is no place of public accommodation, how can it discriminate?

[Albion Wilde]

I was incorrect about the persecuted bakers having four little kids. They have five kids, most of them little.

[piytar]

You are correct. And it is messed up.

[Personal Responsibility]

They did ignore him.

[CityCenter]

It’s my understanding the these damages are not paid to the plaintiff but go to the state. All punitive damages in the state of Oregon go to the state.