Kenya-resident, Malik Obama in Muslim dress, holds up
photo of his half brother Obama in Muslim dress (left),
taken during Obama's earlier visit to his birthplace.
Posted on 09/10/2015 6:49:41 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony
" . . . reports are being manipulated to fit a public narrative"
If this sounds familiar, it should. Tomorrow marks three years since the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, which was followed by several days’ worth of bizarre talk from the Obama Administration about the whole thing starting with a YouTube video. That was all complete garbage, of course, but they were desperate to pitch that narrative in order to protect the larger political narrative that Al Qaeda was on the run.
Three years later, it’s now ISIS that represents the major threat, but the administration’s stance is basically the same. They don’t want to really fight, and in order to keep that approach politicallly plausible, they need to put forward a narrative that the enemy is on the run and we’ve got the upper hand.
So when non-political analysts file reports that completely contradict that narrative, what does the Obama administration do? Alter them, of course. Unfortunately for them, a large group of the analysts is not just sitting back and taking it.
This is nothing new
Remember the Iraq war Bush 2 started?
It gets better.
China is now getting brassy.
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3335165/posts
All it takes is a weak, effeminate, lying, POS president and voila, the worlds crazies want to rumble.
The day this POS leaves the White House all hell is gonna break loose.
As long as Trump keeps playing the ‘Stupid Card’ he’ll stay on the right track. Every day another example comes forward.
Chemical weapons did indeed exist, they were indeed found, several were found via having been turned into IED’s.
(One Sarin, three or more Sulpher Mustard)
May I safely assume you have reports from the people who authored the intelligence briefings from W’s time that assert he altered the reports?
Or is this just normal FUD?
The entire last 6 1/2 years have just been happy talk.
Kenya-resident, Malik Obama in Muslim dress, holds up
photo of his half brother Obama in Muslim dress (left),
taken during Obama's earlier visit to his birthplace.
This corrupt non-transparent pro-IslamicTerrorist
Administration would call the nuclear destruction
of 10 US cities and millions vaporized ... a vitamin.
nothing to see here
A guy enters a Muslim bookstore.
The Muslim owner asks if he could help.
The man said, “Do you have the book by Donald Trump about the problems caused by Muslim immigration?”
The owner answered, “OK, get the f–k out of here, and don’t ever come back, is that clear?”
The customer nodded: “Yes, that’s the one; do you have it in paperback?”
(courtesy Michael Goodwin, NYP)
Fixed it.
-PJ
you forgot to hit the ‘excerpt’ box
Remember the Iraq war Bush 2 started?....Yes. The one Bill Clinton and all the Democrats demanded, but never took the impetus on? The one the UN approved of for the overt actions the Iranians took against UN sanctions (No Fly violations)? The one all the Democrats approved of? That one? The one that took the yellow cake away from Iran and terrorist groups? The one that Russians took chemical weapons to Syria in convoys, while the UN stalled for near two years before allowing attacks to begin? Yes, I remember.
Terrorist violence can make the previously unthinkable suddenly seem acceptable. The levels of surveillance introduced after 9/11 could have been considered reasonable only in the climate of collective panic that the attacks induced. But this week’s reaction to the fatal shooting of four Marines and a Navy petty officer in Chattanooga, Tennessee, by a 24-year-old Muslim has to win the prize for the worst proposed civil liberties infringement to come out of a violent disruption. No matter how high tensions may have run after the Boston Marathon bombing or 9/11, few dared to propose what figures of both left and right have now suggested: the segregation and internment of Muslim citizens.
The first mention of internment came from a somewhat unexpected source: Gen. Wesley Clark, a Democrat known for his progressive-oriented presidential campaign in 2004. Interviewed on MSNBC in the shooting’s aftermath, Clark said the U.S. needed to increasingly get tough on “radicalized” individuals. He spoke favorably of the internment camps set up during World War II, saying that “if someone supported Nazi Germany at the expense of the United States, we didn’t say that was freedom of speech. We put him in a camp.” Lest there be any doubt what Clark was advocating, he insisted that for radicalized Muslims, “it’s our right and obligation to segregate them from the normal community for the duration of the conflict.”
Nice input...thanks.
Same technique they use on unemployment and the economy.
Ok. This is treason. Benghazi was too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.