MIT Romney.
The power to tax is the power to destroy.
Global Warming or Cooling? 124 years of Failed Climate and Environmental Predictions
The insanity of liberalism never ceases to raise it’s ugly head.
Mentally diseased should be totally irrelevant to the issue.
Translation: the stuff we like is too expensive. Even the rubes can’t be convinced to overpay for necessities. The only way for us to get our wish is if we force everybody to pay more than the producers want to charge, then we can take the excess money to sink into our bottomless pit projects.
MIT, I am sorry but you are incorrect. What is needed is a technology shift that powers our cars that is cheaper. When that happens, the market will automatically move in that direction.
Using taxes to control the serfs is reason for revolution.
Pure unadulterated crap.
Physicist Howard Hayden's one-letter disproof of global warming claims [pre-Climategate]Dear Administrator Jackson:
I write in regard to the Proposed Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases Under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act, Proposed Rule, 74 Fed. Reg. 18,886 (Apr. 24, 2009), the so-called "Endangerment Finding."
It has been often said that the "science is settled" on the issue of CO2 and climate. Let me put this claim to rest with a simple one-letter proof that it is false.
The letter is s, the one that changes model into models. If the science were settled, there would be precisely one model, and it would be in agreement with measurements.
Alternatively, one may ask which one of the twenty-some models settled the science so that all the rest could be discarded along with the research funds that have kept those models alive.
We can take this further. Not a single climate model predicted the current cooling phase. If the science were settled, the model (singular) would have predicted it.
(excerpted from Professor Hayden's letter to Lisa P. Jackson, Administrator Environmental Protection Agency. More at link.)
Was Gruber involved in writing this report?
How about Massachusetts form their own country, and carbon tax themselves right into the Third World?
Let’s wreck proven technology to support uneconomic and unproven technology so everyone suffers.
Lemme guess ... and MIT is willing to put its brightest young minds on the problem for millions in grant money.
Academia, is complicit with the left wing in their AGW blather.
I’m sorry to see that MIT has gone over to the dark side. Professor Lindzen wouldn’t approve, but they seem to be ignoring him.
Is this another ‘Grubber’ hate-Americans thing?
Warren Buffett says it's 'highly likely' climate change poses a major problem for the planet
Global Warming on Free Republic here, here and here
translation- We need a carbon tax so the rich can get richer, and the poor can struggle even more as they spend hteir paychecks purchasing gasoline and heating oil to get baCK and forth to work and to heat their homes and have lights at night