Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

When Did The GOP Become The Anti-Free Trade Party?
Investor's Business Daily ^ | 03/23/2016 | Staff

Posted on 03/24/2016 4:49:45 AM PDT by IBD editorial writer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-106 last
To: stockpirate
Yes, as I said most large companies are infected with union labor.

That is a lie. 93% of the workforce is non union so what you are spewing out cannot be true simply because of the numbers involved.

101 posted on 03/24/2016 5:06:34 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint
Members of Congress do a lot of really stupid things.

Not reading the rest of your Free Traitor™ screed. The founding fathers were stupid? You are the jack wagon here. F off.

102 posted on 03/24/2016 5:08:14 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: central_va
Not reading the rest of your Free Traitor™ screed. The founding fathers were stupid? You are the jack wagon here. F off.

OK. That's fine. But I'm not just trying to be a smartypants here. This is serious stuff and it deserves a serious debate.

And your post about the Tariff Act of 1789 was a worthy addition to that discussion.

So I looked up the Wiki and I found this at the end of the article. It looks like they were having the same argument you and I are having way back then. It's worth reading just for the background it provides about the reaction to the passing of the Tariff Act. There is at least a hint that it was step one on the way to the Civil War. Not everybody loved it.

Here is the paragraph from the Wiki:

Political and sectional responses to the tariff

Madison’s attempt to enlist northern merchants and businessmen in supporting an economic contest with Great Britain elicited a cool response.[21] Firstly, British capital and markets contributed to the general prosperity of the North, and secondly, a shift towards France would mean aligning the United States with a revolutionary government that exhibited what Federalist leadership regarded as "an excess of democracy."[22][23] Alexander Hamilton, soon to enter the executive branch as Secretary of the Treasury, declined to support Madison’s proposal and warned that economic warfare with Great Britain would drastically reduce the import duty revenue that the tariff legislation called for, placing at risk the funds anticipated to run the new federal government and finance the national debt.[13] This dispute between Madison and Hamilton marked "the first important breach" between these two Federalist leaders,[20] which would deepen when Hamilton, as Treasury Secretary, launched his fiscal and economic programs, ending their long collaboration.[24] The legislation produced the first sectional strains within "the Federalist coalition of northern businessmen and southern planters."[23] In the South, "agricultural interests" viewed the high tariff and tonnage rates as a triumph for northern merchants and manufacturers, the burden of which fell on southern staple crop exporters.[21]

103 posted on 03/24/2016 5:28:18 PM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: central_va

You are the one spewing non-sense, must be a union member. I’m referring to compaing leaving the country. Bob and Mary’s Diner is moving to Mexico and leaving their 15 employees without a job. Joe’s Sporting Goods won’t move to Mexico and leave their 50 employees jobless.

But Nabisco, a unionized bakery will move to Mexico and hire non-union bakers.


104 posted on 03/24/2016 6:17:10 PM PDT by stockpirate (We must burn down the republican party, to save it for “We the People” (Palin Trump is the 1st wav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate
But Nabisco, a unionized bakery will move to Mexico and hire non-union backers.

Since the price of Oreos will remain the same it is in my best interest that the factory stays in the USA. As a tax payer I am now burdened with a welfare bill for no benefit. There are many R-T-W states that Nabisco could have chosen. So f you and f Nabisco.

Go Trump, Go! On to victory against the Cheap Labor Express.

105 posted on 03/24/2016 6:28:32 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Stentor

“What’s your handicap?”

My handicap is that I have my own business and work for a living.


106 posted on 03/25/2016 3:02:08 AM PDT by Daveinyork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-106 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson