Hot Tesla Model 3 to Get Unneeded $1.5 Billion Tax Subsidy

NLPC ^ | April 28, 2016 | Mark Modica

[jazusamo]

Tesla Motors recently reported that it has received close to 400,000 orders for its yet to be released, $35,000 Model 3. Most of the pre-ordered vehicles are not even expected to be delivered until after 2018. While congratulations may be in order to Tesla for seemingly developing a mainstream electric vehicle (EV) that has so much consumer interest that demand is far outpacing supply, one question must be asked. Why the hell is the vehicle being subsidized to the tune of $1.5 billion in future tax credits?

If Tesla has proven that EVs can be profitably manufactured, it is time for our government to stop handing out the $7,500 tax credit that goes to each of the mostly affluent purchasers of the cars. The credits are capped for the first 200,000 vehicles delivered, making the total subsidy $1.5 billion. Tesla reportedly has doubled that sales figure before even building a single car. Obviously, considering the waiting list of buyers, the car would sell without any tax subsidy. When will someone in our government start questioning why we are wasting tax revenue on unneeded EV tax credits?

In addition to the question of whether or not taxpayers should fund our government’s quest to pick winners and losers, rather than let free markets determine which technologies automakers pursue based on feasibility, there have been studies that show EVs are no better for our environment than conventionally-powered vehicles. These studies take into consideration the effects of mining rare-earth materials such as the lithium used in the lithium-ion based battery technology currently used by Tesla and other EV manufacturers. Power plants producing the energy to recharge the batteries typically leave their carbon footprint, as well.

The benefit to the environment of EVs is debatable; advocates along the lines of Hillary Clinton and President Obama seem to believe that putting the coal industry out of business will reduce the comparative carbon footprint of EVs. Whatever the case, the point is now moot if Tesla has proven that such vehicles can be manufactured in an efficient enough manner such that subsidization is not needed.

If Tesla can build an electric car that appeals to the mainstream public without the need for government handouts, other manufacturers should be able to do it, too. General Motors failed to succeed with its entries to the market of the Chevy Volt and the recently deceased Cadillac ELR. Doling out billions of taxpayer dollars did not assure success in those cases. The burden to improve technologies should be placed upon the manufacturers, not upon taxpayers.

I won’t hold my breath waiting for a politician to speak out against the continued waste of taxpayer money on EV subsidies. When Rep. Mike Kelly (R-PA) sponsored a bill calling for an end to the subsidies years ago, it fell upon deaf ears. Neither party has ever seriously considered reducing the wasteful use of taxpayer money, when the recipients are cronies like General Motors or perceived politically-correct agendas like green energy, the odds are further reduced that common sense will prevail. The common sense answer is that we should end the billions of dollars of tax credits that go to support the sales of EVs that have questionable benefits to the environment, particularly now that Tesla has proven that they are not needed.

Mark Modica is an NLPC Associate Fellow.

[867V309]

Musk is a genius! At making our money his.

[Carriage Hill]

By 2018, it’ll be old news and obsolete.

[W.]

Yet another fancy way for the useless taker crowd to loot the government treasury of our money.

[jazusamo]

Please bump the Freepathon or click above to donate or become a monthly donor!

[blueunicorn6]

400,000 cars ordered.

I read you have to give them a $1,000 deposit to order a car.

That’s $40,000,000 of cash for..........words.

Does anybody else smell something fishy here?

[Sgt_Schultze]

When you’re stuck in a traffic jam in the northeast in winter, how do you choose between staying warm and getting home?

[MarvinStinson]

Traffic jams don’t exist in the theoretical, academic leftwing world.

[ctdonath2]

Your math is fishy.
It’s $400,000,000.

[ctdonath2]

Tesla is getting tax reductions, not free cash.
Same idea as your home mortgage interest tax deduction.
If we can’t get tax cuts across the board, let’s get what we can.
And yes, ICE cars need replacement. Electric isn’t perfect, but is a big step in the right direction. I’ve driven an EV for two years; it’s a superior driving experience (easier to power off grid too).

[sparklite2]

Tesla is getting tax reductions, not free cash.
Same idea as your home mortgage interest tax deduction.
-------------------
Oh, my.  That's going to leave a mark.   LOL

[3D-JOY]

$1000 the first day. To Keep? Re sell at a profit? Or maybe just for fun...less of a gamble than lottery tickets!

Fun to wait and see!

[jazusamo]

There’s quite a difference between a tax deduction and a tax credit and for people that buy up to $125K cars should not be getting $7500 of the taxpayers money who in many cases are not be able to afford that car themselves.

I’ve nothing against EVs other than taxpayer money going to companies in subsidies and tax credits going to buyers. If they’re able to build them profitably and people want to buy them for whatever reason, that’s fine with me.

That’s the way capitalism is supposed to work.

[litehaus]

Just anutter (obama contributor)sycophant at the gubmint teat.

[al_c]

Oh, the irony …

[hal ogen]

I want my money back. I don’t want to fund this electric car white privilege.

[blueunicorn6]

Yep.

Messed that one up.

[Sam Gamgee]

I want to pull my hair out whenever the anti-carbon crowd crow for electric cars. No one ever asks the simple question, what will they use to generate the electricity? They must realize electricity doesn't just come from a hole in the wall, right? Likely it will be from burning oil, natural gas, or coal. Or here where I live hydro electric, but we only have a tiny amount of excess supply, so how do we get more?

[Sam Gamgee]

But....you have to burn carbon to produce electricity to put in the EV? So how does it change the equation?

[Carriage Hill]

With coal and oil shut down by 0bummer and the EPA, NatGas will have to carry the load, but it won’t. The infrastructure isn’t there and won’t be, for a long time. The Anti-Everything Crowd is delusional. The earth will be around millions of years after we humans are gone, despite their interference in Nature.