Posted on 06/20/2016 11:18:47 AM PDT by WayneDupreeShow
As you know on Monday the Obama administration decided to release partial transcripts of the Orlando terrorist shooter's 911 call. They did the American people an injustice by removing some of the references of how the killer pledged allegiance to ISIS.
Yes that's right, your government redirected all mention to the radical Islamic terrorist group called ISIS to help spare the hurt for some of the victims of the attack. Then Obama's Secretary of Defense Ash Carter gives a speech that includes how the shooter was directly connected with ISIS.
How stupid can they keystone cops be? Carter gave information the Orlando Police couldn't give. Where's the smart in that?
The American people know this killer was associated with ISIS. They know it couldn't be anyone else but to listen to this guy give this speech, you have to wonder if he got the memo to nix that part of his talking points.
I have nothing but contempt for this administration so let that be known.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsninja2012.com ...
When’s it going to be a you tube video?
Ash and John! Coincidence??
Actually, I think Ash Carter is going to be one of many that “Oops” out the truth despite Obama and Clinton’s pronouncements. They got to know Obama is around for only a few more months and they’d better get a reality check on things, else plan on lots and lots of free time to spend with their families.
Guaranteed he slipped up because he is as PC as you can get.
You have 10 minutes to pack your desk, security will escort you out of the building.
What caused you to excerpt your own material?
Looking for a few hits on your blog?
I read post number 4 before it was deleted. So that I do not make the same mistake as the poster, what was the error with the posting? The source?
And I’ll just go ahead and stand here and watch you pack up.
It’s about time that the Secretary of Defence tells us what we already knew.
In addition to being a rather vapid, pedantic and useless website, devoid of cogent thoughts that at least excerpt what the core issue is before directing us to a video where we have to wait for the elusive but, alluded to salient point that rather allusive by someone whose thoughts are but, for a fleeting moment, blessed out like a goat and then the point is lost on a final paragraph that never summarizes the issue of hinted at.
I could go on and on and on and on but, to what end and Twix thence and now, I have forgotten what came in between...
Everything this guy posts there are all kinds of deleted posts. Which is odd.
PM whatever #4 was because I don’t get and I never see what is so offensive to the mods.
Thnx in advance.
This is approaching “too obvious to ignore”....this thing about the admin releasing competing news stories to the media; knowing that the media will either regurgitate them verbatim or construct some slightly-addled-but-different-in-some-subtle-way...or both.
A day or two later, the only thing that is utterly missing from media reports is a single “best-fit” Occam’s-razor summation of the facts. What remains are 3-4 competing stories, one focused on “we have to accept gays and lesbians”, another focused on “Trump is a racist s**thead”, and another focused on “we mustn’t insult Islam”.
I mean really, this is deliberate, this release of competing news stories in order to bamboozle. And then from that platform of bamboozedom, we can then look back on “initial reports said that........” and/or “it was reported that......”, or “we tried to contact ______ for a comment, but could not find him/her”.
I repeat: This is deliberate.
By the way, does anyone wonder how the Sec Def has the slightest idea of what happened or how this event is somehow within his purview?
Really? Not the FBI. Not domestic law enforcement of any kind. They are still “no comment”.
The **Secretary of Defense** comments on a domestic event? I guess that happened when Rumsfeld commented on 9/11/2001 but he was more talking about his specific experience on the very grounds of the Pentagon. Not making a conclusion as to the theory of how the event was perpetrated. Am I wrong?
I find this rather odd.
Excerpt) Read more at
You seem to have a major malfunction.
I like Twix.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.