Posted on 11/25/2016 5:48:32 PM PST by drewh
Jill wants a state of her own with a beach mansion on 10,000 acres and ‘deplorables’ as her servants ... All of western Washington would be fine for her personal residence.
Doesn’t matter if he does fall below 270. It’s a majority of the EVs. The EVs would be less if those three states are not in the mix, and he still has a majority there, too.
“They will not get the votes in Wisconsin. No recount has EVER flipped a 27,000 vote lead.”
There was NO way DJT could possibily win the election.
No one has seen the Soros controled voting machines (PA, WI, MI) in action. Perhaps now we will.
Gore could not cherry pick in FL because their law required a full recount. PA law apparently permits picking which counties you want recounted. I think the court ruling was that they had to follow what the state law. Each state manages its own elections...they are not federally managed elections.
Good for her, we will discover that Trump won the popular vote as well
I don’t feel they are disagreeing with me. I feel they are disagreeing with the people of the US. And you also. By your guess, one I share, they are using the state vote to try to overturn the people for the wrong reason. If Hilary wants a recount, get one. But don’t go behind the backs of the voters to assist another candidate that you competed with. That is dishonest. And to further her dishonesty she proclaimed on her twitter account, “My campaign’s goal: Transparent election processes. Didn’t take long to display that falacy.
And let’s face it, she has no chance of winning at all. So I hope all the people that voted for her feel they have been duped and will not support her in the future.
red
“these evil people keep pushing the envelope”
Sadly you are seeing only the early first of it. I looked at what is on the tube today and I am seeing more things about Nixon than ever before. And I have never seen such a barrage of women in charge documentaries since before the election when it should have stopped. I guess as long as they can use the media to short circuit Trump’s work, the idea of working across the aisle should be considered a one way trip. But that’s an old trick of the left, if you can’t disprove the message, hammer the messenger whether they deserve it or not or, in way too many cases, out and out lies.
red
I have yet to see Trump or his people comment on this. Of course, I have yet to turn on the news.
I doubt he will comment. That is a no win situation. We, sometimes Unfortunately, live in a world of the use of laws, made by the people that use them. The creation of the ability to do a forced recount is very obviously not the reason it is being used. To think that in the states she could have had over one million votes miscounted, is not possible. So this recount has nothing to do with her.
If you apply for a job, and they decide not to hire you, can you demand they rethink the situation? They probably wouldn’t validate your parking when they asked you to show yourself out. And saying you are asking not for yourself, but to assist another candidate for the same position, to make sure they considered her more than either you or the chosen or just to create problems in the position for the chosen, is not reprehensible. Morally or otherwise. But is this type of action different from the business as usual for the libs? They talk working with the conservatives, just like they wanted (demanded) we do with them. But, as usual, their idea of cooperation is say no to every yes and yes to every no, every inch of the way, for us to take the blame for anything real or made up. And the media protects them. This is why it would be a no win.
red
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.