Posted on 03/28/2017 7:14:24 PM PDT by Roman_War_Criminal
There are too many slo Joes in today’s world. It’s scary to have a four year old granddaughter. People will innocently come up and comment in the mall or restaurant but it’s always in the back of my mind.
Overall. Obviously.
If the registries worked, then why did those people have the opportunity to re-offend?
It’s simple. They don’t work.
If you need a registry for sex crimes, then you also need a registry for drug crimes, violent crimes, financial crimes, etc.
Calling all sex offenders “predators” is disingenuous and simply not true.
Apparently there is not much we can do if the molester is a high ranking democrat with lots of money.
The headlines would suggest you’re correct.
While there are indeed many people on the sex offender registry who do not belong there, in most states you can filter those out.
Because the offence is now described in the registry in most states.
I live in a town with less than sixteen hundred people.
Last time I checked we had six registered for indecency with a child under twelve. While less than one percent, that’s still a lot of child predators.
Yeah, there is a bill right now in Georgia waiting to be passed that requires anyone who gets convicted twice of soliciting a hooker to register as a sex offender for life.
Seriously slimming the odds she becomes a victim.
Well, I’m not going to endorse prostitution or any of that. But there certainly is a difference, between an adult man seeking an adult woman prostitute, and an offender who attacks someone, especially someone underage.
With these registries and tracking of the offenses, we do need to know why someone is being tagged. Just saying.
Is there any evil you won’t defend?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.