Posted on 05/26/2020 9:41:50 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Aren’t any.
The question asked had an easy answer.....look at who they had to pick from.
For what purpose?
Why...?
The Democrats view the support of the medias as a good thing. I would suggest that it is just the opposite.
Democrats have grown into adulthood without gaining any maturity. They react as a child would.
They want things and they want them NOW!
If you tell them no then you are just a big meanie.
If they don’t get their way they throw a tantrum (riot).
Corruption goes hand in hand with politics. Republicans (while they may be as corrupt) have to be more careful in their corruption. Democrats have the media to cover for them so they don’t really cover their tracks very well
The most corrupt (or the ones most willing to be bought) rise to the top positions.
Until we get a neutral media nothing will change.
Isn’t corruption a prerequisite to be a democratic candidate for any office?
In that case:
What is-The entire Democrat party is corrupt.
Until we get a neutral media nothing will change.
We are unlikely to get a neutral media. The current dominant media is unabashedly progressive. They are showing their ideological foundation.
We will be well served if we get an openly partisan media, which is what we had until the rise of real mass media in the late 1800's. For a little bit, there was quite a bit of "neutral" media, following a journalistic code.
But that went away as the networks became uniformly ideologically progressive.
Now, Constitutionalists have a small percentage of the media, but it has broken the Progressive oligopoly on the media.
Why? Because the demonrat party is nothing but a gigantic criminal enterprise.
All demonrats are criminals.
Healthy, honest people are never democrats - by definition. Unfortunately, honest people rarely run for office as republicans either. We have the completely corrupt democrat establishment and the mostly corrupt republican establishment working together against normal, decent Americans. Thank God for President Trump.
Because those people tend to be successful, and don't want to give that up in order to enter the cesspool that is modern politics.
Why can’t the Republicans find a few more Trumps for their future efforts, and be rid of RINOs?
It’s technically called “scum”, not kidding.
Yeppers.
Sometimes when discussing these people, when folks talk about how this or that person is a “moderate” (they’d consider a McGovern a moderate to right of center these days), I will also bring up cesspools as a metaphor saying that I don’t care how shallow it may be where they are standing, I don’t want to be with them because they’re still standing in crap.
The democrat party has morphed into the CPUSA.
The commies didn’t run a candidate in 2008 or 2012.
The dims were so close to the commies beliefs that they decided to save their money.
2008 was Obama’s first run.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.