Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/29/2003 7:18:24 PM PST by jraven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: jraven
I thought this guy hit it right on the head..
2 posted on 12/29/2003 7:18:50 PM PST by jraven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jraven
I don't think it is a matter of celebrity justice. When you set the hysteria aside, there are some facts you should take into consideration.

The "victim" is a teenager, not a small child. Teenagers have an interest in sex and many are sexually active. In fact, one out of three sex offenders is a teenage boy under the age of 18!!!

We should be always concerned to protect the sexual innocence of children, particularly small children, but when teenagers are involved, there is an issue of mutual interaction. I know what the law states, but that does not mean the law is right or logical.

Does anyone really believe Michael Jackson could really harm a teenage boy? The guy weighs least than most teenagers. He only weighs 120 pounds.
3 posted on 01/01/2004 11:22:48 AM PST by drewliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jraven
Michael Jackson on 60 minutes oozed a (seemingly) childlike innocence...

Belied by the obligatory crotch grabs, orgasmic screams, and violent pelvic thrusts in most of his videos.

4 posted on 01/17/2004 3:54:57 PM PST by luvbach1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson