Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mexico threatens Arizona over anti-illegals measure
WND ^ | Jan 28, 2005 | staff

Posted on 01/27/2005 11:00:51 PM PST by ETERNAL WARMING

INVASION USA Mexico threatens Arizona over anti-illegals measure Official says challenge in international courts possible to block voter-passed Proposition 200

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Posted: January 28, 2005 1:00 a.m. Eastern

© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com

A Mexican government official has threatened to use international courts to block an Arizona law meant to limit public benefits and voting rights to legal residents of the U.S.

Foreign Secretary Luis Ernesto Derbez said in a radio interview Wednesday that an international strategy would be used if other attempts to reverse Proposition 200 fail, the Associated Press reported.

"We are seeking all the legal opportunities that exist, first using the legal capacities of the United States itself and ... if that does not work, bringing it to international tribunals," AP quotes Derbez as saying.

Mexican officials have repeatedly complained about Proposition 200, which went into effect Tuesday. The statewide measure denies most taxpayer benefits to illegal aliens and requires state workers to report applicants for such benefits who may not be eligible. It also requires anyone registering to vote in the state to show proof of citizenship and bring a government-issued ID to the polling place.

AP reported Derbez expressed regret that, according to polls, about 40 percent of Mexican-Americans in Arizona supported Prop. 200. The measure passed with 60 percent of the vote.

"It's sad, and it gives an idea of how we have to work to educate even our own Mexican-Americans about why it is important that these proposals are not accepted," Derbez said.

The Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund has challenged Prop. 200, saying it is "an illegal, impermissible, unconstitutional state attempt to regulate immigration policy, which is a fundamental function and responsibility of our federal government. Proposition 200 is mean-spirited and un-American."


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: aliens; arizona; ftaa; geopolitics; icc; immigrantlist; immigration; maldef; mexico; nafta; nwo; oas; prop200
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

1 posted on 01/27/2005 11:00:51 PM PST by ETERNAL WARMING
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ETERNAL WARMING

I think it's time American Taxpaying Citizens declared war on Mexico since our government won't do it. How about a taxpayer class action suit to recoup our tax money?


2 posted on 01/27/2005 11:02:07 PM PST by ETERNAL WARMING (We have the best politicians corporate money can buy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ETERNAL WARMING

International courts have NO jurisdiction over our affairs in my humble opinion! Are we, as a sovereign nation, going to permit an international court to dictate our internal affairs? When did the state of Arizona relinquish this right to the federal government as the 10th Amendment requires?


3 posted on 01/27/2005 11:18:27 PM PST by Rabble (Is the 10th Amendment in the Bill of Rights, Still in Force?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Why has this been moved to General/Chat?


4 posted on 01/27/2005 11:25:28 PM PST by ETERNAL WARMING (We have the best politicians corporate money can buy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ETERNAL WARMING

To avoid discussion about the subject.


5 posted on 01/27/2005 11:30:58 PM PST by B4Ranch (Don't remain seated until this ride comes to a full and complete stop! We're going the wrong way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gubamyster

PING


6 posted on 01/27/2005 11:38:35 PM PST by ETERNAL WARMING (We have the best politicians corporate money can buy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1_Inch_Group; 2sheep; 2Trievers; 3AngelaD; 4.1O dana super trac pak; 4Freedom; 4ourprogeny; ...

ping


7 posted on 01/27/2005 11:40:30 PM PST by gubamyster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch; ETERNAL WARMING
To avoid discussion about the subject.

And it appears to have worked.

8 posted on 01/27/2005 11:51:37 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: gubamyster


9 posted on 01/27/2005 11:53:47 PM PST by backhoe (-30-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Rabble

"International courts have NO jurisdiction over our affairs in my humble opinion! Are we, as a sovereign nation, going to permit an international court to dictate our internal affairs? When did the state of Arizona relinquish this right to the federal government as the 10th Amendment requires?"

They will go to the Hugue because Mexico has had success with the UN courts ruling in their favor in similar cases. However Washington should be viewed powerless to intervene under the authority of the individual states.

http://newsmax.com/archives/articles/2004/3/31/151227.shtml


10 posted on 01/28/2005 12:11:46 AM PST by seastay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gubamyster; JohnHuang2; keri; international american; Kay Soze; jpsb; hershey; TomInNJ; ...
ALL RIGHT YOU FEELTHY GRINGOS - YOU'RE ALL GOING TO A DETENTION HOLDING CAMP IN A (FORMER) US NATIONAL FOREST - ping.

=====================================================

We (the Mexican government) are seeking all the legal opportunities that exist, first using the legal capacities of the United States itself and ... if that does not work, bringing it to international tribunals," AP quotes (Mexico's Foreign Secretary)Derbez as saying.

* * *

11 posted on 01/28/2005 12:16:04 AM PST by Happy2BMe ("Islam fears democracy worse than anything If the imams can't control it - they will kill it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

why?
Is the subject matter embarassing to folks around here?


12 posted on 01/28/2005 12:17:33 AM PST by recalcitrant (who stole the cork off my lunch?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe

Bring it on chilidog!


13 posted on 01/28/2005 12:19:20 AM PST by Pro-Bush (John has a long mustache.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: seastay

However Washington should be viewed powerless to intervene under the authority of the individual states.

The problem with ARizona is that most of those in power are the open borders crowd. They fought this Prop with everything they had. I can't invision them intervening in support.


14 posted on 01/28/2005 12:23:53 AM PST by ETERNAL WARMING (We have the best politicians corporate money can buy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ETERNAL WARMING
I think the powers that be don't really think this subject is worth discussing.
Plus, it's embarrassing for the President, hence it gets the chat room treatment.
Oh well.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1329257/posts
15 posted on 01/28/2005 12:42:45 AM PST by FBD ("A nation without borders is not a nation." -- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch; Marine Inspector
Time to build a concrete "fence" on our border. Keep 'em from getting here to collect the bennies in the first place.

This is the type of concrete fence (below) that Homeland Security recommends for protecting water reservoirs, etc. It's an incredibly fast type of construction, and it can't be cut like a chain link fence.

www.concretefence.com/pages/homelandsecurity

If it's good enough for protecting our water supplies, it ought to be good enough for our border!

Click on this link (below), it's animated, and shows how the panels install:
http://www.concretefence.com/pages/specs.htm


16 posted on 01/28/2005 12:56:03 AM PST by FBD ("A nation without borders is not a nation." -- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gubamyster

bttt


17 posted on 01/28/2005 1:20:46 AM PST by lainde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: recalcitrant

Extremely so. The subject brings in deserved criticism of the President.


18 posted on 01/28/2005 4:37:21 AM PST by B4Ranch (Don't remain seated until this ride comes to a full and complete stop! We're going the wrong way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: backhoe

I personally want a DMZ of at least 100 miles that I will also use as my private deer hunting reserve, a twofer in my book, third world out, deer hunting in.


19 posted on 01/28/2005 4:53:07 AM PST by junta (If you must hate, hate an ideologue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ETERNAL WARMING
Translation: "WE HAVE A RIGHT TO INVADE YOUR COUNTRY AND MAKE YOUR CITIZENS PAY FOR IT!"
20 posted on 01/28/2005 5:33:29 AM PST by sweetliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson