Posted on 08/20/2006 5:37:25 AM PDT by Rte66
This is a good site regarding the evidence in this case. It just presents it without trying to interpret it to fit a specific theory.
http://jonbenetramsey.pbwiki.com/The%20Body
This will be my last post on this or any thread regarding this tragic murder until actual FACTS are revealed about this pervert Karr.
I don't think he is the murderer (jmo)........
However, I wouldn't put it past some individuals in law enforcement to want to end this "parade" of this sicko EVEN IF the DNA does not match.
Who would know?
that is a pretty far fetched theory if you ask me.
>>>another thing you know Wexford was married twice, right?
Maybe the reporters have it mixed up or don't know there was 2 wives... 1st wife dead, second wife divorced and alive.>>>
You have it exactly right. John is the middle son of Wexford, middle son of his mother.
>>>I will look for your links tomorrow, make sure you ping me.
I am tired and I am going to bed.>>>
I have no links, only information. If you want a link requirement to discuss this with me, I can't help you. But if you want the truth, I'm trying to give it to you. Or you could rely on the media. Either way, doesn't matter to me. I'm just trying to get at least SOME correct information out there.
No problem. All the conflicting evidence makes this case hard to follow and make sense of. I'm still trying. :-)
Thanks for that link...very informative...
The DNA evidence is interesting. With all the complexities of it, and all the possibilities for contamination, age, etc. I wanted to wait and see if we could find out a little more before I took it all in as fact. Some are saying the DNA under the fingernails was not indicative of struggle b/c of its age and small amount. I guess they're suggesting that it could have come from someone BEFORE the murder itself occured. I guess the thinking is that maybe it does match other DNA but that DNA came from someone before the murder. If it did, it still suggests something wacky was going on in that family.
As for the "Patsy did it" theory, it doesn't ring true to me. But that she was involved in a cover-up of some kind is a lot more believable. Not certain, just believable. There are so many variations on these possibilities it will make your head spin.
>>>His father, Wexford Karr, married Patricia Elaine Adcock on Aug. 21, 1958. He was 37 and she was 18, according to court documents. >>>
What source do you have for this? I didn't realize they were giving out her full name!
>>>Now, the part about Wexford being a "well-to-do General Motors" executive doesn't quite ring true with what we have heard, either. I think he would've had enough money to send JMK to college, anyway. I'll get to more later - gotta go check around on some things!>>>
He was not an executive, but made good money with rental property.
>>>You have it exactly right. John is the middle son of Wexford, middle son of his mother.>>>
Pardon me, youngest son of his mother.
I just saw this (your post 100 about the algae on the floor/boot). Is this a fact, or just another clue that was leaked that needs to be taken with a grain of salt?
Not sure if there are two or if the same is discussed twice. Haven't found the one mentioned on TV.
Why cable news pursues the JonBenet Ramsey case
http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0821/p03s01-ussc.html
While broadcast networks offer traditional journalistic fare, their cable rivals are now more like the Daily News than The New York Times.
NEW YORK – "SOLVED!'' read the Daily News headline. "BREAKING NEWS" flashed the MSNBC graphic: "JonBenet Ramsey Case Solved?"
Almost a decade after a flood of media speculation about the unsolved murder of the child beauty queen essentially convicted her parents in the court of public opinion, critics say they were at it again last week.
- snip -
Are you still up?
Up again
A long AJC article from 2-3 days ago
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.