Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Coyoteman
Ann's bones resemble a baboon's bones????? Her face, hair and flesh do not. I knew her much elder brother John several decades ago. Now those two resemble one another. Facial features. Height. Bright. Ability to speak (with admirable sarcasm!). Can drive cars. Would not, on a bet, push buttons in sequence for bananas or swing through the trees or scratch ribs in public or imitate apescreech. I have not met Ann's parents but I am betting that they much more resemble Ann and John than they do baboons or liberals or atheists.

Hey, just to show the kind of guy I am, I CAN AGREE that Annie needs burgers and shakes but she STILL won't look like a baboon or whatever.

I am doing truth. Darwinians are doing science fiction. They scare their apelets and keep them in line with flicks like Planet of the People.

270 posted on 09/22/2006 10:24:42 AM PDT by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies ]


To: BlackElk
Ann's bones resemble a baboon's bones?????

I said primate. That is a much broader class them just baboons.

Ever study bones? I have. Once you learn the human cranium you can look at a monkey cranium and all the bones are the same; somewhat different shape and size, but if you know the bones you can recognize each of them. Same for the postcranials. Genetics is even more definitive.

I am doing truth. Darwinians are doing science fiction.

I am citing verifiable data. If you don't believe it you can go to a museum or take an osteology class and see for yourself. That is the way science works.

I leave it to the lurkers to determine who is doing science fiction.

273 posted on 09/22/2006 10:31:04 AM PDT by Coyoteman (I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies ]

To: BlackElk
I am doing truth. Darwinians are doing science fiction.

So, exactly what is "fictional" about 'Darwinian' science? Are you capable of being more specific, or are you just going to continue to throw about haphazard libel about science (and scientifically literate people) in general (and in turn, completely play into the negative stereotype liberals have about conservatives)?

You're good at jumping up and down and making a lot of noise, here, but you haven't offered any arguments of real substance - only ad hominems and appeals to consequence.

275 posted on 09/22/2006 10:39:25 AM PDT by Quark2005 ("Do not give dogs what is sacred; do not throw your pearls to pigs." -Matthew 7:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson