Hey, just to show the kind of guy I am, I CAN AGREE that Annie needs burgers and shakes but she STILL won't look like a baboon or whatever.
I am doing truth. Darwinians are doing science fiction. They scare their apelets and keep them in line with flicks like Planet of the People.
I said primate. That is a much broader class them just baboons.
Ever study bones? I have. Once you learn the human cranium you can look at a monkey cranium and all the bones are the same; somewhat different shape and size, but if you know the bones you can recognize each of them. Same for the postcranials. Genetics is even more definitive.
I am doing truth. Darwinians are doing science fiction.
I am citing verifiable data. If you don't believe it you can go to a museum or take an osteology class and see for yourself. That is the way science works.
I leave it to the lurkers to determine who is doing science fiction.
So, exactly what is "fictional" about 'Darwinian' science? Are you capable of being more specific, or are you just going to continue to throw about haphazard libel about science (and scientifically literate people) in general (and in turn, completely play into the negative stereotype liberals have about conservatives)?
You're good at jumping up and down and making a lot of noise, here, but you haven't offered any arguments of real substance - only ad hominems and appeals to consequence.