Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Jane Austen

Morning Jane- good post

“”””If you don’t want to call HKS...”””

As I see it we have three choices:

HK$ is the unlucky acquaintance of two young people accidentally dying in his presence.
Or
HK$ is an illiterate, stupid, ignorant, careless idiot who had no clue about the effect of taking copious drugs in lethal combination and could not, or did not read & comprehend the medical cautions on the pharmacy instruction sheets attached to every drug prescribed in his name.
Or
HK$ is the most careful, clever and diabolical murderer in the annals of crime.


10,679 posted on 05/05/2007 6:26:03 AM PDT by sodpoodle ( Despair - man's surrender. Laughter - God's redemption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10675 | View Replies ]


To: sodpoodle
I agree.

Reminds me of the "coincidence" in the Scott Perterson case of him fishing right were the bodies turned up.

10,690 posted on 05/05/2007 7:48:17 AM PDT by Jane Austen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10679 | View Replies ]

To: sodpoodle
Amazing the pass that HKS has been given, the rationalizations and benefit of the doubts he has received, the careful low key tone of waiting for hard evidence, the respectful entertainment and hard news media coverage (even before his threats of law suits), the absence of investigative digging on his statements, his movements, his bank accts, his past, his family, his law practice, his debts, where he makes his money; by the press, law enforcement, the ME, Anna’s Hollywood friends and business assoc, LB, and all those who supposedly loved her.

Especially when compared to the anal exam and mind reading techniques used on grandma, lol. Who seems the only one suspicious at this point.

Again, its weird.

Everybody loves a “winner” I guess, and Stern is definitely a “winner”

10,693 posted on 05/05/2007 8:29:10 AM PDT by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10679 | View Replies ]

To: sodpoodle

That’s it in a nutshell, sod, including any and all variations/combinations of the 3:) I still tend to place most of the onus on Anna herself and the doctors over the years who kept writing her scripts.
It is possible Stern deferred to the doctors supplying the meds and wasn’t completely up on all the dangers of Anna’s meds, when combined or not, even though he certainly did know Anna had a big addiction problem. I read the inserts on medications I get and do look them up on the ‘Net, usually, but I never used to and I’m pretty smart, all considered. I just have had a hard time believing Stern kept Anna drugged up for his own reasons and I think we’ll eventually hear he did try to regulate her intake and get her to stop at times. If we do hear that, I’ll probably tend to believe it, even if it comes from his own mouth,lol! For years, I thought Anna was doomed to hit her bottom hard one day, and that she did. I don’t think Howard or anyone else could have stopped it, only delay it. The only person who may have been able to make a difference could have been Dr. KE, at the end. But, when it looks like even having little DL couldn’t pull Anna out of it, who else really could have?


10,697 posted on 05/05/2007 9:52:40 AM PDT by tabor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10679 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson