Posted on 07/09/2007 1:32:44 PM PDT by JKrive
WASHINGTON A powerful think tank chaired by former Sen. Sam Nunn and guided by trustees including Richard Armitage, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Harold Brown, William Cohen and Henry Kissinger, is in the final stages of preparing a report to the White House and U.S. Congress on the benefits of integrating the U.S., Mexico and Canada into one political, economic and security bloc.
The final report, published in English, Spanish and French, is scheduled for submission to all three governments by Sept. 30, according to the Center for Strategic & International Studies.
CSIS boasts of playing a large role in the passage of the North American Free Trade Agreement in 1994 a treaty that set in motion a political movement many believe resembles the early stages of the European Community on its way to becoming the European Union.
"The results of the study will enable policymakers to make sound, strategic, long-range policy decisions about North America, with an emphasis on regional integration," explains Armand B. Peschard-Sverdrup, director of CSIS' Mexico Project. "Specifically, the project will focus on a detailed examination of future scenarios, which are based on current trends, and involve six areas of critical importance to the trilateral relationship: labor mobility, energy, the environment, security, competitiveness and border infrastructure and logistics."
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
NAW! or should I say NAU! No way. The American people would never go for such a union. The only way it could happen would be by forcing it on the American people, maybe by somehow getting half of all Mexicans into the US by some unfathomable means, in which case it wouldn’t matter much whether we merged or not. After that, the rest would indeed be easy. But no American President would ever try such a connivingly traitorous thing.
Oh, wait...
Thanks for the ping.
At one time I had the utmost respect and trust for Sam Nunn.No more now. To be quite honest most of these old geezers need to stay in their nursing homes.
It looks like Sam Nunn is head honcho of CSIS which get 9% of its funding from the government and 28% funding from corporations. Sam Nunn was a big backer of free trade. So this pretty well tells me that his interest is in the dollar and not the sovereignty of the U.S. I don’t trust a one of those dudes mentioned. We need to do some emailing to our senators and representatives.
Did you catch that we need to "improve" labor mobility? They are going to keep coming. We need to organize, stay organized, give beyond little $25 and $100 contributions. If our forefathers pledged their lives, fortunes and sacred honor can't we at least pledge a significant portion of just our fortunes? How about instead of lives a few days a year protesting or attending meetings?
This is a ping list promoting Immigration Enforcement and Congressional Reform.
If you wish to be added or removed from this ping list, please contact me.
As you'll see from a link below, the North American Union topic is par-and-parcel of the debate on immigration; thus my directing you to this thread.
Latinos will be majority in state by 2042
3 Dead, 12 Hurt When SUV Carrying 19 Suspected Illegals Crashes
Contractors could add to BP ranks Proposal could dramatically boost Border Patrol presence in region
Pro-Immigration Forces Back North American Union
Latino advocates look for political payback Thanks, indcons!
erm, on Rush's show, Roger Hedgecock went into great detail about this last week. Where were you? And Savage? Come on- he's been the main guy on the immigration debate for years now. I can't imagine him not mentioning this. (Personally, I don't listen to him much because he's on so late.)
Some of you can laugh at the fact this particular article came out in WND....but this info has been and is in dozens of other places...just go on Search and type in SPP or North American Union.....
In an earlier post someone mentioned if this is so important why havn't Rush etc. been talking about it....PLEASE, for many months he and others poopooed concerns about ILLEGAL immigration ...I remember being so damned disgusted at some of his dismissive comments at the time.Only after the public became outraged over the situation did he and other jump on the band wagon. I do believe this evil plan will happen,.. over the years the powers that be have worked to get their ducks all in a row and as for assuming that the Congress won't go along with such a traitorous plan...give me a break, you give that bunch far too much credit...they are for the most part a bunch of corrupt, greedy souls with alliance only to their own power and corruption....and as for President Bush...at this stage of the game, I put nothing past him when it comes to pushing his agenda, and this sure is it....you know, as long as he's in office, he has the power of Executive Order...wouldn't surprise me at all if he signed some version of what got shot down a couple of weeks ago and tell the American Citizen's to go pound sand. This comment isn't directed especially at you, but for all those who refuse to take this thing seriously...
Good on you, girl...thanks for that one.
Repost BTTT
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/06/20070615-10.html
President Bush to Attend North American Leaders' Summit in Canada
"President Bush will travel to Montebello, Quebec, Canada to meet with Prime Minister Stephen Harper of Canada and President Felipe Calderon of Mexico at the North American Leaders' Summit on August 20-21, 2007. The leaders will review progress and continued cooperation under the Security and Prosperity Partnership, as well as discuss hemispheric and global issues."
Yes, and while it’s not something I jump for joy about, he’s never put his name on a CFR publication and seems about as much a “member” as I am of the RNC. Member-in-name only.
Even if he were higher up, at worst, I’d consider it something to keep an eye on, but not a deal-killer.
Nobody denies the SPP exists.
The debate is on it’s purpose and expanse.
You're kidding, right?
It’s right here:
http://www.spp.gov/myths_vs_facts.asp
It’s the “myths vs. facts” section that is in dispute. If people don’t even realize it exists, then it’s not hard to find.
Because the government would never lie to us...right Betty?
There’s a big difference though.
The immigration bill was disputed publicly on the MSM and talk radio. The SPP, not so much.
While I don’t think the SPP is any sort of wonderful organization, I also don’t see any grand conspiracy at work. I just don’t think it could be kept secret (save for the blogosphere) if it were true - talk radio would get on it and hardcore if there were really that much to it.
You’re very polite, so I looked at your profile. My God...I have shoes older than you! :-)
Well, I turn 30 next month...and there are 2 interns here under 20. I feel old in my office!
Bump for later read.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.