Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ed Hale got the divorcee decree of Dunham vs Obama Sr.
Plains Radio ^ | 1/2/09 | Patriot08

Posted on 01/02/2009 1:16:10 PM PST by patriot08

Ed Hale of Plains Radio has secured a copy of the Dunham/Obama divorce decree as promised. He has registered this at the courthouse and has turned the document over to lawyers who are reported to be happy and enthused over the contents.

This is the first page. This is all that can be divulged at this time as those who have seen the decree are sworn to silence. You may hear information about it tonight on Ed's plainsradio show.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: anyminute; bho2008; birthcertificate; birthplace; certifigate; divorce; dunham; obama; obamafamily; obamatruthfile; realsoonnow
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,021-1,0401,041-1,0601,061-1,080 ... 1,941-1,945 next last
To: Star Traveler
I'll help you some more. If the court decides he's qualified then their decision will be analyzed to determine how the decision was made. If the court is not thorough or accurate in their process, it will not be the end of the issue, as I indicated earlier.

You need to read some US history about public pressure, civil disobedience, and investigations of "closed issues."

I mentioned abortion earlier. Anyone who's been alive the last 25 years knows that a supreme court action is not the final word on everything.

1,041 posted on 01/02/2009 9:32:36 PM PST by nufsed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1035 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

I just can’t see her traveling alone. I would thin that she would accompany SR to Kenya and return to the US with him.....She was a young wgirl with a new baby....She may have travel from the east to west coast alone, but not all the way from Africa....No Africa—England—East Coast and then onward by herself to WA or HI.

What is the closest airport to Harvard?


1,042 posted on 01/02/2009 9:32:46 PM PST by hoosiermama (Berg is a liberal democrat. Keyes is a conservative. Obama is bringing us together already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1034 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler
And if it’s no big deal for a Vice President to be qualified, I’m wondering if someone will try to promote the idea that it shouldn’t be important for a President to be qualified either — since a Vice President can take the office of President without being qualified.

http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_amendments_11-27.html
U.S. Constitution
AMENDMENT XII
Passed by Congress December 9, 1803. Ratified June 15, 1804.
... "But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States."

1,043 posted on 01/02/2009 9:32:46 PM PST by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1018 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

You couldn’t be more wrong and more ignorant of US history.


1,044 posted on 01/02/2009 9:33:26 PM PST by nufsed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1038 | View Replies]

To: nufsed

Okay, then the Vice President has to be qualified under the same provisions as the President. That clears it up....

So, President Arthur was neither Constitutionally qualified as Vice President or as President of the United States...

My God... President Arthur is doing “twice” what people say that Obama is doing — but he’s only doing it for one office (Arthur did it for two offices [i.e., not qualified]


1,045 posted on 01/02/2009 9:33:46 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1032 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

Boston


1,046 posted on 01/02/2009 9:33:54 PM PST by nufsed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1042 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler
Your questions about Arthuir have been answered repeatedly on this thread. I have no pretension that you will believe me, if you didn't believe 5 or 6 others.

Secondly, so what?

1,047 posted on 01/02/2009 9:35:33 PM PST by nufsed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1045 | View Replies]

To: keepitreal

Do yo have a port of entry section, for those who immigrated to the US, at that sight?


1,048 posted on 01/02/2009 9:36:09 PM PST by hoosiermama (Berg is a liberal democrat. Keyes is a conservative. Obama is bringing us together already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1037 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler
I’m finding it very odd that people have decided that they won’t accept a Supreme Court ruling if it does not go the way they have decided it should go. That doesn’t sound like following our “system” at all...

Here we may find some common ground.

There is a difference between accepting a Supreme Court ruling on the here and now, and fighting to change it (which is not an accepting behavior).

For example, I offer the recent Kelo eminent domain "takings" decision. People accepted the taking of their property because the alternative was forcible removable by law enforcement. But, that did not stop states from enacting laws to nullify the Supreme Court ruling for future eminent domain claims in their states.

So, Supreme Court rulings are not "final" in that sense. If Obama can't be stopped in 2009, he might still be prevented from running in 2012, as was Arthur, by new laws requiring the positive proof of qualification by candidates before running for president.

-PJ

1,049 posted on 01/02/2009 9:36:16 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (You can never overestimate the Democrats' ability to overplay their hand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1030 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

Class is adjourned. Do your homework and correct your misconceptions about supreme court decisions.


1,050 posted on 01/02/2009 9:36:18 PM PST by nufsed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1045 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

PS: good night.


1,051 posted on 01/02/2009 9:36:45 PM PST by nufsed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1045 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

They might have made some type of copy and included info from the b.c. in the immigration paperwork.


1,052 posted on 01/02/2009 9:36:51 PM PST by Chief Engineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1003 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

That would depend on what sort of precedent it sets. If there’s not a sufficient factual basis for the court to take any action, it wouldn’t be of much value.


1,053 posted on 01/02/2009 9:37:09 PM PST by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 994 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine
I know what you mean. High cheekbones are a dominant trait and he looks NOTHING like his father. Not even a little bit.

But he looks very much like his typical white grandfather.

Cheekbones, nose, teeth, ears, even the hairline. He looks like Grandpa. Only his skin tone, slightly "nappy" hair, and maybe fuller lips show that some man with African ancestory, almost anyone would do, was his biological father.

1,054 posted on 01/02/2009 9:37:47 PM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 742 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

It is leftwing liberals who believe that whatever the Court says is automatically a proper interpretation of the Constitution. They would love for conservatives to just accept whatever the Court rules on as being the new Constitution. Just re-write it from the bench.

Honestly you are sounding more and more like a leftwinger. You want to make it seem like it wont be a big deal if Obama serves even if he is ineligibe just because Arthur did, we should just accept anything that the Supreme dictators in black robes say as Constitutional, etc...

Typical liberal talking points.


1,055 posted on 01/02/2009 9:37:49 PM PST by TheBigIf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1038 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

It has port of entry for ships, most stopping around 1957 or so.


1,056 posted on 01/02/2009 9:38:46 PM PST by keepitreal (Obama brings change: an international crisis (terrorism) within 6 months)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1048 | View Replies]

To: nufsed

You said — “You couldn’t be more wrong and more ignorant of US history.”

Well, I’m certainly called by a lot of names here..., it seems... LOL...

But, still — it’s very odd that people are not going to accept the highest court in the land’s decision — if they don’t agree with it. It certainly would be what I have heard that “others” should accept — if — the court were to rule in our favor — that is the “others” who disagree *should* abide by it.

However, if “we” are the “others” — then we shouldn’t abide by their decision. That makes for a very confusing type of government. Which *we* should be be listening to as right — if not the Supreme Court and if not the Constitution which has endowed the Supreme Court with this power...

That’s almost like getting into Alice in Wonderland...


1,057 posted on 01/02/2009 9:39:00 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1044 | View Replies]

To: nufsed; All

Ignor the person who is trying to keep us from finding the answers, by changing the subject...It is a AXELTURFF TECHNIQUE.....

Let’s get to work! We can, if we all work together, find the answer.


1,058 posted on 01/02/2009 9:39:14 PM PST by hoosiermama (Berg is a liberal democrat. Keyes is a conservative. Obama is bringing us together already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1047 | View Replies]

To: thecodont

Good to hear that... I thought there was a big loophole there...

I guess President Arthur violated that provision two times in two offices...


1,059 posted on 01/02/2009 9:40:02 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1043 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

He looks a LOT like grandpa... first time I’ve seen that picture.


1,060 posted on 01/02/2009 9:42:04 PM PST by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1054 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,021-1,0401,041-1,0601,061-1,080 ... 1,941-1,945 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson