Skip to comments.Ed Hale got the divorcee decree of Dunham vs Obama Sr.
Posted on 01/02/2009 1:16:10 PM PST by patriot08
Ed Hale of Plains Radio has secured a copy of the Dunham/Obama divorce decree as promised. He has registered this at the courthouse and has turned the document over to lawyers who are reported to be happy and enthused over the contents.
This is the first page. This is all that can be divulged at this time as those who have seen the decree are sworn to silence. You may hear information about it tonight on Ed's plainsradio show.
Don't worry — All rumors of my death have been greatly exaggerated. I saw some black helicopter outside my house last night, but there were after my neighbors - LOL.
Sorry, I've been with a small team of researchers over in the Plains Radio chat room most of today. We're on some good leads that just popped up in the last few hours. The '64 divorce decree opened up a fair number of doors: http://www.scribd.com/doc/9694026/Obama-64-Divorce-Decree-Plains-Radio
Create yourself a log-in and come join in — http://www.plainsradio.com/
Yaelle, it is unnerving.
But that's because the foul mouthed DUmmies over there have no intellectual stimulation, so they come here for their jollies.
Here's hoping they quote this!
Well, good. Good luck and happy hunting.
Have you seen the official divorce papers of his parents revealed anywhere else ?
I’m willing to keep an open mind, just on that new revelation alone. If he gets something very relevant as he believes he will, the world will go wild. If not, things will be no different than they are now. I want all possibilities .. including court cases, investigations, etc. to play out to the very end ... to the last second of the last day.
Actually, this is the first proof I’ve seen that 0bama’s parents were actually married, since there were no marriage records that have surfaced. This is also important, because now if it turns out that 0bama was born in Kenya (or anywhere except in the US) he is not a US citizen. If his parents were not married, that would likely not be the case (except for the age of his mother).
Plus, the name his mother used is significant since it has apparently made finding other stuff easier.
DIdn’t you read any of this on this thread? It’s all there.
In response to a suggestion from another poster on this thread, I listened to a June, 2001 broadcast of the “Art Bell Show” on YouTube last night featuring a caller named “Bugs” who had a voice that is IDENTICAL to Ed’s. He claimed to have shot and killed two bigfoots in 1976 and to have buried the bodies in an area near the Red River not too far from Wellington! Art said that “Bugs” sent him a detailed map locating the burial site. Of course, nothing ever came of the tale.
I would BET THE RENT that “Bugs” is in fact Ed Hale. Ed’s voice is UNMISTAKABLE! Furthermore, “Bugs” was 56 in 2001 as Ed was also.
I’ve been listening to Plains Radio for a couple months now and my initial reaction to Ed was that he was a pretty good ol’ boy, albeit a bit of a rumor monger. But I’m beginning to believe, based on the “Bugs” business as well as Ed’s delaying, audience-seeking tactics on Plains, that what our friend Ed really is is an attention hound and little else. I hope he can bring home the “goods” on the BC but I’m growing more and more skeptical of Mr. Hale by the minute.
I’ve never listened to Ed Hale, know very little about him other than what I read on FR. And I don’t care about him; BUT - I am glad he found and publicized this divorce decree that none here have seen before. It helps unravel the mystery. That alone is good enough for me.
The messenger doesn’t have to be perfect in every way, you know.
I just figured I’d check out Scanian’s other comments since he registered in September, and this and one other are his sole comments. Odd. His other one is copied below:
Palin Slashed Funding for Teen Moms
Tuesday, September 02, 2008 6:25:56 PM · 72 of 109
Scanian to All
Id like to be positive and optimistic about McCain aqnd Palin but we have heard nothing but smear attacks on Sarah since Friday. The attacks appear to be having the desired effectObama jumped up by 3 or more points in the daily polls today. We can scream about bias all we want but this country is full of impressionable people who believe what they hear from the drive-bys. I hold out very little hope for this ticket. Hope springs eternal but the facts cannot be ignored.
I’d say seminar/DU/Obama team member.
He joined 12/9/2000...??????
And made not a comment until September, and one today.
Probably one of those screen names they have on hand somewhere at DU or other leftist gigs just in case they need one.
The decree DOES contain some clues, I must admit, but it was nowhere near the bombshell that Ed promised his listeners last week. I hope the information it contains is of some help to the various litigants in the eligibility cases.
You need to look again LJ: I’ve been registered since December 9, 2000. I might have posted the comment you cite out of frustration with the MSM vis-a-vis Sarah Palin and I’ve been mainly a lurker over the years but I have been an active Republican election worker here in Florida for a long time. I’ve never so much as visited the DU site, or KOS for that matter.
If you doubt what I say about the “Bugs” business, check out the YT vid for yourself and see if you don’t agree: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=niLvytleTA8&feature=PlayList&p=4FB9C2F7061E8036&index=0&playnext=1
As I said, I’ve been listening to Hale and he struck me as just a well-meaning cowboy but the Art Bell bit pushed me over the line of incredulity.
That is correct, A.C. I’ve visited FR sporadically over the years and I had a serious health problem for part of that time which kept me off the blogs but I’ve been monitoring the eligibility question avidly and I’ve been doing my best to convince everyone I know that B.O. is no natural born citizen, at least not of the U.S.! I hope that Freepers will not hold my years of inactivity and lurking too much against me!
Duh - signup date in 2000, first comment this September.
And Scanian - if you are indeed a conservative, and not a troll, time will tell and I will apologize publicly!
I am sorry to hear about your health problem and I hope it is resolved.
You can be as cynical as you want, LJ, but the explanation I gave to A.C. is 100% accurate. Accept it or reject it, as you wish.
I’ve grown cyncial over the years...
I don’t listen to radio so all I have to go by is what I read.
And I sincerely hope your health is better and that you post more often on FR.
Didn’t anyone else see post 1191? Berg claims at the ObamaCrimes site that he has had this divorce info for many months. Also says there is no reference to Obama’s place of birth. Interesting.
If you read through this thread carefully, you would see that the place of birth was not on the decree, but info on the decree led to finding records elsewhere. And apparently Berg has had this doc but to my knowledge did not show it anywhere, just the info that he had it.
“Didnt anyone else see post 1191? Berg claims at the ObamaCrimes site that he has had this divorce info for many months. Also says there is no reference to Obamas place of birth. Interesting.”
The chat room at Plains Radio is crucifying Berg for that comment. Ed and others are piping in they think he’s just doing it for publicity. Some are saying maybe he had it and it was part of his pending SCOTUS case. But most are downplaying that it’s a me-too attempt for future book rights, etc. Don’t shoot the messenger . . .
I did notice that post and that is one reason that I got upset with Hale and Plains Radio. If Berg had the decree, Ed offered his listeners nothing earth-shaking at all. Monday’s show should give us some insight into how much Ed can really deliver.
Thank you for saying that, A.C. I think you’ll find that many “lurkers” are the type of person who is a “good listener” in the flesh. And we might rather read than write. Laziness or shyness could be part of the problem, I will admit! As for conservatism, I started out by passing out Goldwater bumper stickers and pins in ‘64. Of course, Hillary was a “Goldwater girl” back then but some of us have remained true to the cause! Some more vocal than others, of course!
I come and go with the wind for reasons like the questioning of your posting history. When it gets too childish I go away for a while.
Thank you, L.J. I’ll probably be posting more but over the years I’ve expressed my conservatism more on a face-to-face basis. But this eligibility outrage has caused a good many of us to “go public!”
I went away for over a year. People come and go, I don’t see it as a big deal.
I’d be willing to bet there are plenty of us out here that are on the quiet side. I keep busy just trying to keep up with all that’s happening. I spend many hours here at FR but don’t post much. I sincerely hope there’s info in that divorce document that will keep Obama from taking office. One thing for sure I won’t be watching tv Jan 20. Makes me ill thinking about it.
AC - I was almost completely absent from FR for more than a year too, these things happen!
Just that there have been a lot of trolls around lately, and some of them do have older signup dates but no comments until recently, so my suspicions were raised.
If I’m wrong, and future comments will determine that, I’ll be happy my suspicions were unfounded!
And Scanian - I’ll apologize right now, then.
Doesn’t look that way. Scanion’s mainly a lurker. There are plenty of trolls on the list, so we don’t need to expand the definition or jump the gun.
Hey, Scanion, it’s too late to welcome you to FR but if you only recently started posting then maybe it is appropriate ;-) Glad your health is getting better.
Maybe I need to just go play my guitar for a while!
Don’t worry about it. I agree that it was suspicious. It’s things like this that teach you to be a bit more cautious and careful, so it’s a good thing after all.
Hang in there and keep up the good work.
Thanks for the apology Buddy!
Thanks Kevmo-—a lurker is what I’ve been till now! I read once that a very small percentage of the people who read blogs ever post a comment, so I suppose I’ve been part of the “silent majority.” I’m doing what I can down here in FL to make peole of all “stripes” aware of the Obama con...and the reception has been surprisingly positive.
“The ‘64 divorce decree opened up a fair number of doors”
What doors? I listened to Ed Hale, for the first time, last night, and he never seemed to have a coherent point. He kept, profainly I might add, exclaiming he had proof that Barrack Obama was born in Kenya...but this was not evident from the documents he posted. The attorney from Washington state that spoke was more understandable, but it was nothing to do with Obama being born in Kenya....it was the same old stuff about him being ineligible because his father was Kenyan. While I personally agree with that interpretation of the constitution, I don’t think the courts do. Only Mr. Obama being born in Kenya to an underage mother is going to have the legs to even remotely force the courts to act.
Where is this proof? Mr. Hale never explained, he just said the BC was at a port of entry.
At first, I thought the 2nd page displayed the 2nd story of the main house, however, I believe that it would be noted as such in the record. Instead, it's referred to as ‘main square footage,’ and the dimensions (14’ x 32’) aren't jiving with the main house. Further, as a life long carpenter, I wondered if the 14’ x 32’ dimension simply represented a smaller upstairs area. Upon viewing the overhead image from google earth, I saw no evidence of a roof structured in such a way, as to support the possibility of a smaller upstairs, therefore I believe that the 448 sf main area IS the cottage.
In one of the many threads, an image of the cottage was posted. The image is of the front and appears to have been taken from about 20’-30’ away. The dominant color of the exterior at the time the photo was taken was blue.
I posted a number of facts at one of the many BC threads, to Chief Engineer, regarding the assessor's information on the subject address.
Google maps hasn't photographed or added the option of a street view in this area of Honolulu yet, so there's no way to access a peek behind the house (at the ground level) from the comfort of one’s home.
It could have been a rental, at one time or another. It needs to be determined when the structure was built, as it may have been at a time, after the main house was constructed. If that is the case, it would raise suspicions further, that the Obama’s did not stay at this address after Junior’s birth.
I think you answered your own question... the evidence; and it may not be an actual birth certificate, but some other paper trail, is allegedly at a port of entry, and an effort is being made to obtain the document(s.)
FWIW: Ed's confidence level seemed fairly high.
Either Ed has the goods, or he doesn't. It's fairly straight forward. Time will tell.
Ed and his mining team managed to obtain the divorce decree. To his credit, he also shared it with the public.
Granted, the decree offers limited knowledge. However, if Hale is to be believed, the decree contained a significant clue leading to the port of entry docs. That clue, is the exact syntax of Obama's mother's name in the decree: Stanley Ann D. Obama.
Apparently, Berg has been in possession of the same decree for months. I am not aware of any sharing of the docs. by Berg, with the public. Also, whether Berg used the same search techniques, leading him to the same evidence Hale claims to be hot on the trail of, remains unknown.
S.V., take a listen to the following YouTube interview: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=niLvytleTA8&feature=PlayList&p=4FB9C2F7061E8036&index=0&playnext=1
I gave Hale the benefit of every doubt for 2 months but after last night’s show and then listening to the Art Bell interview with “Bugs,” who is ABSOLUTELY Ed Hale, regarding Ed supposedly shooting to death two Bigfoot and burying them in the Texas Panhandle in ‘76, I had no choice but to conclude that this man is seriously needy for attention and will do and/or say most anything to get it. Their was some value in posting the decree but ol’ Ed had his listeners on pins and needles for days expecting documentary proof of Obama’s Kenyan birth. People get tired of being baited and manipulated and the eligibility issue is way too important to be exploited for reasons of gaining internet ratings and/or attention.
I'm just a bit apprehensive about great discoveries that are held back for media effect. Either one is a patriot who is interested in truth or a gold digger with dirt that will never make the light of day unless posted in the Enquirer, etc.
This guy should show the world now...
6075 Kalanianaole Hwy . Is this the correct address?
“Im willing to keep an open mind, just on that new revelation alone. If he gets something very relevant as he believes he will, the world will go wild. If not, things will be no different than they are now. I want all possibilities .. including court cases, investigations, etc. to play out to the very end ... to the last second of the last day.”
Can’t be said any better than that! Starwise speakest well.
That would be a screwup.
It’s 6-0-8-5 Kalanianaole Hwy.
The assessor’s records show 1948 as the year built, with an effective date of 1952. Perhaps the 1948 date is the time (year) when the building permit was first issued, and the 1952 date was the first time (year) taxes were assessed.
No, that is "Natural Born Citizen -- The Fantasy". This is Natural Born Citizen -- The Law.
As you well know, that Code section includes several categories of people who are CITIZENS BY STATUTE rather than NATURAL BORN. Please stop your transparent, trollish attempts to confuse other posters.
If 0bama was indeed born in Kenya, why would he be a US citizen, since his parents (as we now know for sure) were married, his father was a foreign national, and his mother was not old enough to confer citizenship on him?
Sure. Just as soon as you point out where natural born is defined in the Constitution or in law. You can do that, can't you? That would set all us trolls straight once and for all. </sarcasm>
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.