Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ed Hale got the divorcee decree of Dunham vs Obama Sr.
Plains Radio ^ | 1/2/09 | Patriot08

Posted on 01/02/2009 1:16:10 PM PST by patriot08

Ed Hale of Plains Radio has secured a copy of the Dunham/Obama divorce decree as promised. He has registered this at the courthouse and has turned the document over to lawyers who are reported to be happy and enthused over the contents.

This is the first page. This is all that can be divulged at this time as those who have seen the decree are sworn to silence. You may hear information about it tonight on Ed's plainsradio show.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: anyminute; bho2008; birthcertificate; birthplace; certifigate; divorce; dunham; obama; obamafamily; obamatruthfile; realsoonnow
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,261-1,2801,281-1,3001,301-1,320 ... 1,941-1,945 next last
To: Kevmo

Maybe I need to just go play my guitar for a while!


1,281 posted on 01/03/2009 7:50:38 PM PST by little jeremiah (Leave illusion, come to the truth. Leave the darkness, come to the light.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1280 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

Don’t worry about it. I agree that it was suspicious. It’s things like this that teach you to be a bit more cautious and careful, so it’s a good thing after all.

Hang in there and keep up the good work.


1,282 posted on 01/03/2009 7:54:21 PM PST by Kevmo ( It's all over for this Country as a Constitutional Republic. ~Leo Donofrio, 12/14/08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1281 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

Thanks for the apology Buddy!


1,283 posted on 01/03/2009 8:16:37 PM PST by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1279 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

Thanks Kevmo-—a lurker is what I’ve been till now! I read once that a very small percentage of the people who read blogs ever post a comment, so I suppose I’ve been part of the “silent majority.” I’m doing what I can down here in FL to make peole of all “stripes” aware of the Obama con...and the reception has been surprisingly positive.


1,284 posted on 01/03/2009 8:16:37 PM PST by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1280 | View Replies]

To: BP2; All

“The ‘64 divorce decree opened up a fair number of doors”

What doors? I listened to Ed Hale, for the first time, last night, and he never seemed to have a coherent point. He kept, profainly I might add, exclaiming he had proof that Barrack Obama was born in Kenya...but this was not evident from the documents he posted. The attorney from Washington state that spoke was more understandable, but it was nothing to do with Obama being born in Kenya....it was the same old stuff about him being ineligible because his father was Kenyan. While I personally agree with that interpretation of the constitution, I don’t think the courts do. Only Mr. Obama being born in Kenya to an underage mother is going to have the legs to even remotely force the courts to act.

Where is this proof? Mr. Hale never explained, he just said the BC was at a port of entry.


1,285 posted on 01/03/2009 8:40:48 PM PST by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1251 | View Replies]

To: Spunky; Chief Engineer
On the assessor's site, and at the link you provided, click on page two, and you will find a 448 sf stand alone structure. You can google earth the address and see the cottage's roof outline. It's in the right rear (SE corner) of the lot, directly behind the main house. The roofing material appears white. The main house roofing material color is green. The garage is located to the left front (NW corner) of the lot.

At first, I thought the 2nd page displayed the 2nd story of the main house, however, I believe that it would be noted as such in the record. Instead, it's referred to as ‘main square footage,’ and the dimensions (14’ x 32’) aren't jiving with the main house. Further, as a life long carpenter, I wondered if the 14’ x 32’ dimension simply represented a smaller upstairs area. Upon viewing the overhead image from google earth, I saw no evidence of a roof structured in such a way, as to support the possibility of a smaller upstairs, therefore I believe that the 448 sf main area IS the cottage.

In one of the many threads, an image of the cottage was posted. The image is of the front and appears to have been taken from about 20’-30’ away. The dominant color of the exterior at the time the photo was taken was blue.

I posted a number of facts at one of the many BC threads, to Chief Engineer, regarding the assessor's information on the subject address.

Google maps hasn't photographed or added the option of a street view in this area of Honolulu yet, so there's no way to access a peek behind the house (at the ground level) from the comfort of one’s home.

It could have been a rental, at one time or another. It needs to be determined when the structure was built, as it may have been at a time, after the main house was constructed. If that is the case, it would raise suspicions further, that the Obama’s did not stay at this address after Junior’s birth.

1,286 posted on 01/03/2009 8:46:00 PM PST by freepersup (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1224 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas
Where is this proof? Mr. Hale never explained, he just said the BC was at a port of entry.

I think you answered your own question... the evidence; and it may not be an actual birth certificate, but some other paper trail, is allegedly at a port of entry, and an effort is being made to obtain the document(s.)

FWIW: Ed's confidence level seemed fairly high.

Either Ed has the goods, or he doesn't. It's fairly straight forward. Time will tell.

Ed and his mining team managed to obtain the divorce decree. To his credit, he also shared it with the public.

Granted, the decree offers limited knowledge. However, if Hale is to be believed, the decree contained a significant clue leading to the port of entry docs. That clue, is the exact syntax of Obama's mother's name in the decree: Stanley Ann D. Obama.

Apparently, Berg has been in possession of the same decree for months. I am not aware of any sharing of the docs. by Berg, with the public. Also, whether Berg used the same search techniques, leading him to the same evidence Hale claims to be hot on the trail of, remains unknown.

1,287 posted on 01/03/2009 9:03:53 PM PST by freepersup (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1285 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas

S.V., take a listen to the following YouTube interview: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=niLvytleTA8&feature=PlayList&p=4FB9C2F7061E8036&index=0&playnext=1

I gave Hale the benefit of every doubt for 2 months but after last night’s show and then listening to the Art Bell interview with “Bugs,” who is ABSOLUTELY Ed Hale, regarding Ed supposedly shooting to death two Bigfoot and burying them in the Texas Panhandle in ‘76, I had no choice but to conclude that this man is seriously needy for attention and will do and/or say most anything to get it. Their was some value in posting the decree but ol’ Ed had his listeners on pins and needles for days expecting documentary proof of Obama’s Kenyan birth. People get tired of being baited and manipulated and the eligibility issue is way too important to be exploited for reasons of gaining internet ratings and/or attention.


1,288 posted on 01/03/2009 9:10:45 PM PST by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1285 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
Good points, all.

I'm just a bit apprehensive about great discoveries that are held back for media effect. Either one is a patriot who is interested in truth or a gold digger with dirt that will never make the light of day unless posted in the Enquirer, etc.

This guy should show the world now...

1,289 posted on 01/03/2009 9:40:57 PM PST by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1256 | View Replies]

To: freepersup; Chief Engineer; Polarik
Ooops! I never did see that there was a second page. There is a small structure. BLUSH! BLUSH!
1,290 posted on 01/03/2009 10:06:45 PM PST by Spunky ((You are free to make choices, but not free from the consequences))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1286 | View Replies]

To: freepersup
My father just emailed me some pictures taken this afternoon from the street. He lives five blocks up the hill. He also noted the current house was built in the nineties.

6075 Kalanianaole Hwy . Is this the correct address?

1,291 posted on 01/03/2009 10:37:30 PM PST by justrepublican ("There is nothing that can stop the government from taxing 100 percent of income.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1286 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

“I’m willing to keep an open mind, just on that new revelation alone. If he gets something very relevant as he believes he will, the world will go wild. If not, things will be no different than they are now. I want all possibilities .. including court cases, investigations, etc. to play out to the very end ... to the last second of the last day.”

Can’t be said any better than that! Starwise speakest well.


1,292 posted on 01/03/2009 10:58:59 PM PST by BonRad (As Rome goes so goes the world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1255 | View Replies]

To: Chief Engineer
The zip code did not begin until 1963. source They did not list one, did they?

That would be a screwup.

1,293 posted on 01/03/2009 11:21:11 PM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 843 | View Replies]

To: justrepublican

It’s 6-0-8-5 Kalanianaole Hwy.

The assessor’s records show 1948 as the year built, with an effective date of 1952. Perhaps the 1948 date is the time (year) when the building permit was first issued, and the 1952 date was the first time (year) taxes were assessed.


1,294 posted on 01/04/2009 2:05:39 AM PST by freepersup (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1291 | View Replies]

To: Spunky

:o)


1,295 posted on 01/04/2009 2:08:46 AM PST by freepersup (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1290 | View Replies]

To: sticker
I'm gonna ignore the "clown" comment, and focus on this one:

Explain to me the difference between those of you that have convinced themselves that obama isn't a citizen and the goofs on the left that were convinced the Bush stole the election in 2000 and 2004?

You are either playing "word tricks" and are dishonest, or you are uninformed or misinformed.

The question under discussion isn't whether Obama is a "citizen" of the United States. We all agree that Obama is a "citizen."

The question is whether Obama is a "natural born citizen" of the United States, and anybody that has fairly looked at the evidence would have to come to the conclusion that Obama does not meet that definition.

Natural Born Citizen -- The Law


1,296 posted on 01/04/2009 6:14:16 AM PST by Beckwith (Typical white person)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1240 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith
Natural Born Citizen -- The Law

No, that is "Natural Born Citizen -- The Fantasy". This is Natural Born Citizen -- The Law.

1,297 posted on 01/04/2009 6:23:45 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1296 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

As you well know, that Code section includes several categories of people who are CITIZENS BY STATUTE rather than NATURAL BORN. Please stop your transparent, trollish attempts to confuse other posters.


1,298 posted on 01/04/2009 7:10:50 AM PST by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1297 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith

If 0bama was indeed born in Kenya, why would he be a US citizen, since his parents (as we now know for sure) were married, his father was a foreign national, and his mother was not old enough to confer citizenship on him?


1,299 posted on 01/04/2009 9:07:54 AM PST by little jeremiah (Leave illusion, come to the truth. Leave the darkness, come to the light.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1296 | View Replies]

To: Scanian
As you well know, that Code section includes several categories of people who are CITIZENS BY STATUTE rather than NATURAL BORN. Please stop your transparent, trollish attempts to confuse other posters.

Sure. Just as soon as you point out where natural born is defined in the Constitution or in law. You can do that, can't you? That would set all us trolls straight once and for all. </sarcasm>

1,300 posted on 01/04/2009 9:13:27 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1298 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,261-1,2801,281-1,3001,301-1,320 ... 1,941-1,945 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson