Skip to comments.Ed Hale got the divorcee decree of Dunham vs Obama Sr.
Posted on 01/02/2009 1:16:10 PM PST by patriot08
Ed Hale of Plains Radio has secured a copy of the Dunham/Obama divorce decree as promised. He has registered this at the courthouse and has turned the document over to lawyers who are reported to be happy and enthused over the contents.
This is the first page. This is all that can be divulged at this time as those who have seen the decree are sworn to silence. You may hear information about it tonight on Ed's plainsradio show.
There are times when I think the Dems have recruited people to plant these silly stories that go nowhere, figuring that if they cry wolf often enough, people will stop paying attention. Thus if anything real comes up, nobody will pay attention.
Everybody just calm down.
Ed will explain it all again when he talks to the lawyer.
Don’t be so quick to jump the gun until he goes over it with the lawyer
To be clear, Ed says the divorce decree contains obvious information that LEADS to the original birth certificate, which they found, but don’t yet have, but will need a P.I. to get and expect to have to file FOIA to obtain, and once they obtain it, he wants Leo Donofrio to file suit to prevent Obama from taking office.
And ... the attorney is on now!
Is this the part where the attorney is one block from home and he gets slammed by a jack-knifing tractor trailer carrying a combination of freshly cut logs, maple syrup and pancake batter?
What a sweet way to go!
And now, we'll never know! AAARRRRRRGGGGGHHHHHHHHH!
What's on next--The Shadow?
I was just thinking the same thing
This is what I thought as well.
The item about the two year prior residency in Hawaii.
Ed Hale Are you suggesting coconuts migrate?
I would SHOOT MYSELF first before I would ever succomb to being an Obot.
I’ve been praying and praying for this SOB to get NAILED and was getting pysched we FINALLY had the usurper.
There is NOTHING in those documents that are incriminating!
I’m about to explode here - I WANTED SOMETHING TO BE THERE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I musta missed it the first time.
One thing for sure, he is a shotgun wedding baby. Obama born in August, parents married in Feb in the same year.
You seriously need to relax. Let this play out please.
Okay, calming down, and trying to listen to the attorney......
They located a port of entry birth certificate for Barack Obama who was born in Kenya. Four days after Obama was born, the BC was registered in this port of entry.
He’s going to tell the attorney off the air the name of the city of the port of entry ... going to break ...
I too feel jerked around, but he is the only one who has produced the Obama divorce papers.
The port of entry birth certificate was registered four days after Obama’s birth.
Hey, old FRiend! Happy New Year!Hope you are well!
Ain’t this a kick in the teeth?
Well, that document now kills the conspiracy theories that Bambi’s birthday is different or he changed his name.
That’s when the birth announcement was published in the Hawaiian newspaper.
Ed will explain it all again
I musta missed it the first time.
Okay help me out here:
What in the world is in those divorce documents that would have led them to the discovery of the birth certificate in a port of entry???
I don’t see a thing.
You have a point. He IS the only who has produced the Obama divorce papers.
Obama Sr was in MA from fall of 1962 until spring of 1964 when he returned to Kenya with Ruth. He was not in MA until 1965 as Jr had claimed in his book, and as quite a few presstitutes has written. Obama Sr also received an M.A. not a Phd(from Harvard) as some of his Kenyan relatives claim.
You’ve been here 6 weeks.
The only suspect O-Bot is you, pal.
“Does it say that their child was born in Kenya?:
Must be the “D” she used in her name?
I know what you mean, but the Lawyer is on now.
The Decree is proof that Obama was Barry Soetoro, an Indonesian citizen under the premise of that marriage.
This is explicitly why the CA Supreme Court waned the Decree, but no one could find it in time before the Electoral voted.
The Kenyan birth angle is the best one though.
Anybody feel like singing the anticipation (ketchup) song?
Gee...I haven’t been teased like this since ....well... nevermind (that’s too personal). Now I feel like I need a consolation prize. Or at least a little reward for hanging in there this long....and perhaps a cigarette.
“Is this the part where the attorney is one block from home and he gets slammed by a jack-knifing tractor trailer carrying a combination of freshly cut logs, maple syrup and pancake batter?”
And the chain holding the logs was hit and severed by a shooter on a grassy knoll!!
yes, I agree. Let’s give the man credit for tenacity. And the divorce papers are a concrete, not seen before item.
I want to learn more about the trial of the bc being recorded via port of entry. Sounds like a hopeful angle.
Okay, that is true. he did dig them up and no one else seems to have bothered or could find them.
But there is no way that an FOIA request will be done by the time Obamanazi is sworn in.
“Hes going to tell the attorney off the air the name of the city of the port of entry ... going to break ...”
It is logical that they cannot reveal the port of entry because it will cause a horde of attorneys to descend on this to stop it from being released. I am waiting to see what the attorney has to say.
Back from break ...
Hey n00b, you may want to watch who you’re calling an O-bot.
Some progress has been made here even though this is all still a wait and see scenerio.
The claim that there is a BC at a port of entry. That is what we are getting here. How long now until we know if this is true?
I still don’t get it. I didn’t see anything in the Obama divorce documents that Jr.’s name is anything other than Obama. Is there another document I’m missing?
Hey newbie, you haven’t earned your stripes here yet to be calling other FReepers trolls.
re not ordering child support - could an American Court order it for a foreign national?
or could an American Court merely allow deferral of the issue until such time as the foreign national became an American citizen?
Obama's team offered millions (according to Korir) for the tape and Korir gave it to them? Why would Korir get the tape back? I guess Korir forgot to make copies?
I wanted to believe the MO story. The remarks sounded just like her. And how would a bogus person know about the Kenyan/Iran ties for trade? Unless it was a Kenyan imposter I guess. Wait, to even say that means I fell for Korir's story that someone actually called.
Korir you must be desparate for attention or money or both. It seems you have information and no one is listening or you feel no one will listen. But it is interesting you do not want the Kenya tribal information posted involving Odinga and his political agenda.
I don’t remember the date of the newspaper clipping. Saw it on whatreallyhappeneddotcom. What I noticed about that clipping though was that the source was the Hawaii Bureau of Vital Statistics or something like that.
That’s why I wasn’t convinced that Obama wasn’t born in Hawaii. But there is something mysterious about this. Why all the hiding of background information?
I may have erred in reporting what Ed claimed the reason was, for the missing pages (8,9,10 & 11.) I'm having trouble recalling the exact words. A second listen of the program (later) can clear up the confusion. The PI is supposed to be sending them (shortly) on to Ed.
Well, it wasn’t you!
And besides, since when does a timeframe determine who is trolling or not?
I know for certain there are a few that have been members a long time here that are also major Libtards.
It’s obvious who is and isn’t .. even across “Blogsphere”, the same method is used.
Yeah, it sure backfired for the left. Now they're stuck with the House the Senate AND the White House. Poor suckers! /s
Attorney is talking about the implications of a Kenyan birth certificate ...
1952 Nationality Act controlled Obama’s birth. Stanley Ann must have been in US five years before Obama was born. She was three months short of that so Obama doesn’t get automatic US citizenship, he would have to become naturalized ...
Evidently, the discovery is how Stanley Ann listed her legal name at the time:
Stanley Ann D. Obama
It seems that an aias used by Ann Dunham is what lead to this port and the BC.
If he is not releasing the name of the port then he probally is not actually releasing the alias name either. It is probaly in the missing pages.
You said — “In Star’s defense, I don’t think she is trying to do that. But she rather believes that it doesn’t matter, that we should ignore the truth because looking for it is “distracting” to making sure this doesn’t happen again. She thinks we should just ignore the Constitutional requirement, this time, in favor of making sure they observed next time.”
Ummm..., with a friend like that, who needs enemies... :-)
I think I’ll be the one who can say what I’m trying to do, thank you. You may or may not choose to believe me — but at least, I’ll be the one who lets you know what my intentions are and what I’m trying to do.
#1 — don’t believe it really matters — not correct..., you don’t seem to differentiate between what is *desired* versus *what is*. There is a difference. I know what is desired — I did not vote for Obama, I did not desire Obama. Now, that’s a desire. Does it matter? Yes, it matters. Now, that’s the desire and wish and intention part — but — we’ve got a *big problem* with something called *reality* — Hey! “reality check” here... Does anyone see the handwriting on the wall? Nope...
Now, if you would distinguish reality from wishes and desires and “what ought to be” — then you could easily figure out what I’m saying.
#2 — ignore the truth, huh? Now, that’s a big LOL.. If there is anyone ignoring the truth — they’re the ones who are “ignoring the truth of reality”... get it? There is such a thing as “truth” — and you see it happening in front of your face, when you walk out the door. That’s a “truth” that is outside of yourself and outside of your desires and outside of your idealogy and outside of your political persuasions.
Now, we know the *truth* of what the Constitution says — but — no one seems to *know* the truth of what Obama’s birth certificate says. So, when you don’t know the truth — the motto around here seems to be “go with the speculation” and *proclaim* that as the *truth*... Nope... that won’t work, and it sure won’t work in the real world and with courts and documentary evidence requirements.
#3 — distracting? — ummm..., practice chewing gum and walking at the same time... then you’ll do better in that category... :-)
#4 — ignore the Constitution, nope. So far even Obama has not ignored the Constitution. He says he meets the qualifications. So, tell me -— “How is Obama ignoring the Constitution?” when he says he’s qualified. Oh..., I see, you don’t believe him and so on that speculation — you’re going to remove someone from being President. My, my..., it’s a good thing our whole country doesn’t run on that type of thinking...
You know..., it’s just like this Ed Hale program, the Chief Editor Korir (who is back at it again...) and so many other avenues and trails that everyone is going down. Just deliver the document and present it in court and be done with it. Simple. Don’t accuse, don’t guess, don’t speculate — just prove it. It’s not that hard... “or is it?”
On to your next item — “What I would ask is: What happens if you get your wish, many states require proof of eligibility before a candidate can be put on the ballot and then in 2012, it turns out Obama was not eligible. He’d have served for 4 years. What happens to every law signs, every order he gives and every appointment he makes. All illegitimate, since they were done by someone not eligible to the Office.”
What happens... oh..., just about the same thing that’s going to happen with all that I see going on here — Obama is going to be President. That’s about it in a nutshell.
Oh, and we’ve had another guy who was supposedly born in Canada, but it was *questionable* (just like in this Obama qualifications issue; i.e., “it couldn’t be proven absolutely”) and we’re still just as good with our Constitution now as we were before. He didn’t cause any harm (from *that issue* alone). Chester A. Arthur, the 21st President — was said to have been born in Canada. Now, let me ask you — are his Presidential orders, laws and other paperwork and treaties invalid?? I don’t think so...
And then, lastly you said — “I’d just as soon avoid that kind of nightmare, if we can. If we can’t, or even if we can, we can still work on getting those state level proof of eligibility laws put in place. It’s not an either/or situation. IMHO, of course.”
In terms of the “Qualifications issue” (alone, not on politics) — what problems did we have that were a nightmare with Chester A. Arthur, being born in Canada? If you tell me about the nightmare from that administration in regards to the Qualifications issue — then I’ll get a better idea of the nightmare that we’ll have in comparison to his. Remember, “history” is a pretty good indicator of what will happen again.
All right - missing pages....that could be it
Part of the pie is better than no pie. ;o)
I am willing to suspend judgement and see how this plays out. Ed’s confidence level is rather high, and seems genuine.
VERY INTERESTING POINT by the lawyer.
The document is invalid simply from having the Certificate Number blacked out.
Bottom of Certification says “Any altercation of this document makes it invalid”.
The claim that the original B.C. is at a U.S. port of entry seems dubious at best. Ann would have had to go through immigration upon arrival with a baby and the proof that she had registered the birth at the nearest U.S. embassy to where the birth occurred, but she would have kept the B.C, and been given U.S. immigration paperwork. Any child born abroad could tell you that!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.