Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did Earth's Twin Cores Spark Plate Tectonics?
Discovery News ^ | 06 Jan 2009 | Michael Reilly

Posted on 01/07/2009 9:20:26 AM PST by BGHater

It's a classic image from every youngster's science textbook: a cutaway image of Earth's interior. The brown crust is paper-thin; the warm mantle orange, the seething liquid of the outer core yellow, and at the center the core, a ball of solid, red-hot iron.

Now a new theory aims to rewrite it all by proposing the seemingly impossible: Earth has not one but two inner cores.

The idea stems from an ancient, cataclysmic collision that scientists believe occurred when a Mars-sized object hit Earth about 4.45 billion years ago. The young Earth was still so hot that it was mostly molten, and debris flung from the impact is thought to have formed the moon.

Haluk Cetin and Fugen Ozkirim of Murray State University think the core of the Mars-sized object may have been left behind inside Earth, and that it sank down near the original inner core. There the two may still remain, either separate or as conjoined twins, locked in a tight orbit.

Their case is largely circumstantial and speculative, Cetin admitted.

"We have no solid evidence yet, and we're not saying 100 percent that it still exists," he said. "The interior of Earth is a very hard place to study."

The ancient collision is a widely accepted phenomenon. But most scientists believe the incredible pressure at the center of the planet would've long since pushed the two cores into each other.

Still, the inner core is a mysterious place. Recently, scientists discovered that it rotates faster than the rest of the planet. And a study last year of how seismic waves propagate through the iron showed that the core is split into two distinct regions.

Beyond that, little is known. But Cetin and Ozkirim think a dual inner core can explain the rise of plate tectonics, and help explain why the planet remains hotter today than it should be, given its size.

"If this is true, it would change all Earth models as we know them," Cetin said. "If not, and these two cores coalesced early on, we would have less to say, but it could still be how plate tectonics got started."

Based on models of Earth's interior, Cetin thinks the two cores rotate in opposite directions, like the wheels of a pasta maker. Their motion would suck in magma from behind and spit it out in front. If this motion persisted for long enough, it could set up a giant current of circulation that would push plates of crust apart in front, and suck them down into the mantle in back.

Friction generated by the motion would keep the planet hot.

Scientists asked to comment on this hypothesis were extremely skeptical. Some asked not to be quoted, citing insufficient evidence to make a well-reasoned critique of the study, which the authors presented last month at the fall meeting of the American Geophysical Union in San Francisco.

"In terms of its volume, and even its mass, the Earth's inner core is quite small relative to the whole planet, about 1 percent," Paul Richards of Columbia University said. "I seriously doubt that inner core dynamics could play a significant role in moving the tectonic plates."


TOPICS: Astronomy; Science
KEYWORDS: catastrophism; core; earth; impact; jmarvinherndon; lunarcapture; lunarorigin; moon; tectonics; theia; themoon; thomasvanflandern; tvf; twin; vafirsoff; valdemaraxelfirsoff
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

1 posted on 01/07/2009 9:20:27 AM PST by BGHater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Earth - With Dual Core Technology


2 posted on 01/07/2009 9:24:53 AM PST by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
But most scientists believe the incredible pressure at the center of the planet would've long since pushed the two cores into each other.

The pressure at the center of the earth is just about zero. The geologists are smoking dope again.

ML/NJ

3 posted on 01/07/2009 9:26:52 AM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj
The pressure at the center of the earth is just about zero. The geologists are smoking dope again.

I thought the pressure at the center of the earth is around a million times atmospheric. Are you confusing pressure with gravity?
4 posted on 01/07/2009 9:33:47 AM PST by ZX12R
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj
The geologists are smoking dope again.

Did they ever stop? Booze and dope are staples for Geologists, and I challenge any Geologist who has done a lot of fieldwork to claim otherwise.

5 posted on 01/07/2009 9:34:22 AM PST by HerrBlucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
and help explain why the planet remains hotter today than it should be, given its size

Silly scientists, everybody knows that's because of man-made global warming! AlGore told us so. The science is settled. Shut up.

6 posted on 01/07/2009 9:38:23 AM PST by NonValueAdded (once you get to really know people, there are always better reasons than [race] for despising them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj

The pressure at the center of the earth is just about zero.

The gravity at the center of the earth will be just about zero (since the mass of the earth is approximately equally distributed in every direction. However, the pressure (from downforward in all direction from above) will be quite strong.

7 posted on 01/07/2009 9:46:16 AM PST by CaptainMorgantown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ZX12R
I thought the pressure at the center of the earth is around a million times atmospheric. Are you confusing pressure with gravity?

I'm not confusing anything. Pressure is force (applied over some area). Where do you think the force comes from, PV=nrT?

ML/NJ

8 posted on 01/07/2009 9:47:20 AM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

This guy obviously is not part of the consensus!! s/


9 posted on 01/07/2009 9:49:24 AM PST by Iron head mike (I only watch porn because I like the music)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
Haluk Cetin and Fugen Ozkirim of Murray State University

Go Racers!

10 posted on 01/07/2009 9:55:56 AM PST by Eagle Eye (Libs- If you don't have to play the rules then neither do we...THINK ABOUT IT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj
"Results of the study of seismic wave propagation in the form of density distribution yielded a hypothetical pressure distribution model of the earth's interior. At the centre, the pressure is about 380 GPa (380,000,000,000 pascal)."

According to my calculations, that's about 55,100,000 PSI.
11 posted on 01/07/2009 10:02:29 AM PST by ZX12R
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj

Are you a hollow Earth guy?


12 posted on 01/07/2009 10:05:12 AM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj

I thought that ‘PV=nrT’ is for gases.


13 posted on 01/07/2009 10:08:07 AM PST by chopperman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DManA
Are you a hollow Earth guy?

No. But I do have science degrees in other fields. I've been asked a couple of times by geology professors (I like to sit in on geology classes.) to write a paper about this when I've discussed it with them, but I really don't know much about writing such papers and haven't done so,

ML/NJ

14 posted on 01/07/2009 10:14:17 AM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: chopperman
I thought that ‘PV=nrT’ is for gases.

It is. So maybe that's not the imagined source of the imagined pressure?

ML/NJ

15 posted on 01/07/2009 10:16:41 AM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj

Could you explain your theory please?


16 posted on 01/07/2009 10:20:42 AM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj

BTTT


17 posted on 01/07/2009 10:24:56 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DManA

If you had a hollow earth, would gravity pull you towards the center of the sphere? Yes. I believe gravity would be highest at the center, so anything other than a singularity would feel tremendous gravitational pressure at the center.

So the question is would that pressure be any different in a non hollow earth? I don’t think so. Or maybe I am wrong? Would the center be an “anti” gravity peak effectively repulsive? Are objects attracted to the center of mass even if the center of mass is not in the mass?


18 posted on 01/07/2009 10:26:07 AM PST by LeGrande
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

I thought the force of the hypothesized collision basically liquidated the cores of both bodies allowing everything that didn’t become the moon to meld into the new Earth.


19 posted on 01/07/2009 10:34:23 AM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LeGrande

At every point in the sphere the force vector due to gravity is the sum of all force vectors acting on it. At the center are all the vectors add up to 0. Is this correct?


20 posted on 01/07/2009 10:46:27 AM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson