Posted on 02/21/2009 6:24:01 PM PST by freeplancer
Colofornian,
I would like to suggest that freeplancer may not be whom they say they are.
If freeplancer was against the Mormon church they might pretend to be a Mormon then throw out blatant lies to stick the proverbial stick in the hornets nest. This in turn makes people believe that all Mormons believe crazy revisionist history.
I don’t believe freeplancer to be a Mormon. Freeplancer makes posts that seem to line up with Mormon beliefs then throws in the blatant lies to stir the pot.
Scum-sucking haters. Why can’t they leave us alone. Aren’t we supposed to leave them alone, after all?
“I don’t believe freeplancer to be a Mormon.”
What kind of miserable loser goes around trying to determine who is of what religion? Amazing.
The same type of loser that doesn’t want someone pretending to be Mormon so they can tear tear the religion down.
There was another person recently who used similar tactics. Mark Hoffman seemed like a perfect Mormon but secretly wanted to tear the religion down.
When you lash out it makes me wonder.
You should get a job or something. You sure seem to have plenty of time to protest on street corners and worry about everyone’s religious preferences. Maybe you should get another family to keep you busy.
You are about as Mormon as Bill Hendrickson.
What the hell are you talking about? I was talking about the HOMOSEXUALS! I’m not one of those idiots!
I really have no idea whom that Bill person is.
I am also not Mormon. I am actually Catholic. I married a LDS woman who is the Mother of my 7 children.
I just don’t like to see people tear down the LDS church when they pretend to represent the LDS church. The LDS people in my neighborhood are very good people.
It does no good to perpetuate lies or skirt the issues. Polygamy in my mind is not some ultimate evil. It is something that is a perversion that does not bother many people as long as its between consenting adults. Why spread lies about Joeseph Smith? Or any of the church leadership.
If you are LDS and you have a problem with polygamy then the LDS church might not be the church for you.
If you are LDS for the victim hood then you might be in the right place.
This might be a bit off topic for this thread. If there is another thread you would like to take this then please let me know.
(Hey, if he had a time machine back to the 1850s, 1860s, 1870s, 1880s, 1890s, 1900s why he could set the coordinates for "Utah" and not only would there be other add-on families for the pickings, but the folks there would see "bishop eligibility" registered in their eyes)
And if you think that's just empty rhetoric, I cite this reference from Salt Lake City Signature Books, 1988 -- Eugene Campbell's Establishing Zion book: "Bishops were also expected to set an example to the communities in the matter of plural marriage. New men were chosen to replace recalcitrant bishops who refused to take additional wives." (p. 71)
I told you, I don’t read your words. I have also asked you to quit pinging me and to quit thread stalking me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.