Posted on 01/22/2010 9:43:06 AM PST by Malone LaVeigh
The world’s first “sex robot”, a life-size rubber doll called Roxxxy who can have real conversations with her owner, including about football, has been unveiled. The dark-haired, negligee-clad, life-size robotic girlfriend comes complete with artificial intelligence and flesh-like synthetic skin.
Standing five feet, seven inches tall, the doll weighs 120 pounds, comes with five “personalities”, is “ready for action” her developers said.
(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...
She can’t vacuum, she can’t cook but she can do almost anything else if you know what I mean,” the New Jersey-based artificial intelligence engineer said.
I’m reminded of the words of that great American philosopher Rodney Dangerfield:
“Marry a woman who can cook. The sex will wear off but you’ll always be hungry.”
Read post 41.
Now, if they would just build a male robot who can dance and help in the garden . . . .
Who will be the first guy that wants to marry his doll? If gays can marry, why not humans and robots? Then who will be the first gay guy that wants to marry his gay guy robot? Guarantee you, it’s coming, not a question of if but when.
You just answered my question ... I was wondering what the kids would be like.
What i could wash it up
snort!
As easy and shallow as many women are these days, I can’t see what purpose this serves.
CREEPY!
Oh - you've met my ex!
Pick up line: “Hello, dolly”.
Got one yet????
Hey Bendy, your kinda chick!!
Association or American?
I believe a Japanese guy did marry his...I think I saw a thread on it a few months back.
“Why is it incumbent upon men to put the seat down...why don’t women share equal responsibility to put it up?”
Because the majority rules. And by majority, I mean, you may pee standing up but all other toilet “activities” for both males and females require the seat to be down. So: males peeing = 1. Males pooping + females peeing + pooping = 3. Got it?
“As easy and shallow as many women are these days, I can’t see what purpose this serves.”
Let me get this straight - you choose to insult women on a thread about stupid, desperate, immature men building a doll because they can’t *deal* or won’t *deal* with a live female? Allrighty then...good luck with all that.
Good grief. Some of you women frigging amaze me. Are you so driven by emotion that you are incapable of logical thought?
I said MANY women, not ALL women. I didn’t even say MOST women.
Unless you’re one of those shallow, easy women, I see no reason why you should get your panties in a knot.
Yeah, dissect your words to defend yourself. I hope that works out for you. I’m not taking the bait.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.