Posted on 01/22/2010 9:43:06 AM PST by Malone LaVeigh
The world’s first “sex robot”, a life-size rubber doll called Roxxxy who can have real conversations with her owner, including about football, has been unveiled. The dark-haired, negligee-clad, life-size robotic girlfriend comes complete with artificial intelligence and flesh-like synthetic skin.
Standing five feet, seven inches tall, the doll weighs 120 pounds, comes with five “personalities”, is “ready for action” her developers said.
(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...
No dissection of my words is needed. What is needed is some reading comprehension on your part.
I’ll just add you to my list of Irrationally Offended Females Who Must Not Allow The Insulting Of Any Sister Possessor Of A Vagina.
Snicker. Whatever makes you *feel* better.
Do they make a version for women named Bernie?
Q: Why did the brunette write “TGIF” on her shoes?
A: To remind her that “toes go in first.”
___________________________________________________________
Q: What do you do if a brunette throws a pin at you?
A: Run like heck - she’s got a grenade in her mouth!
___________________________________________________________
Q: What do you call a brunette who dies her hair blonde?
A: Artificial intelligence.
___________________________________________________________
Q: Why was the brunette staring at the orange juice container?
A: Because it said (from) “Concentrate”.
___________________________________________________________
Q: How do you make a brunettes’s eyes light up?
A: Shine a flashlight in her ears.
___________________________________________________________
Q: What do UFO’s and smart brunettes have in common?
A: You hear about them all the time, but you never see one.
___________________________________________________________
Q: What do you call 25 brunettes standing ear to ear?
A: A wind tunnel.
___________________________________________________________
Well, you’re not the first, and probably won’t be the last.
I am curious about something:
Why would you get offended because I insulted a group of women that you’re more than likely not a part of?
I certainly don’t get offended when someone insults a group of men that I have no affiliation with.
Why ruin a good thing?
I didn’t get offended. I just pointed out that you insulted women (didn’t say how many or which ones) when the topic of the article is about men who are interested in a fake female for myriad reasons. That’s all. You brought up panties getting bunched, emotions, etc.
And no, I’m not a part of the women you spoke of.
I figured the ladies get enough ribbing in threads like these, I could give out some myself :)
And I wish men knew wgat it felt like to fall in the toilet, butt first at 3 AM... Espesially when it wasn’t flushed...
...and now gets virtually no sex!
That’s something I’m teaching my Sons, and they do it every time.
“If there’s a woman in the house, ALWAYS close the lid. Your lives may depend on it -especially if it’s THEIR house.”
Or...as my old man used to say...
"There's an ass for every seat."
Doesn’t matter if they own the house. Grew up with women and made a few of my own. I have been trained. It was a matter of survival. (they can be VERY vindictive at night!)
>> And I wish men knew wgat it felt like to fall in the toilet, butt first at 3 AM
Funny, that’s *exactly* the whining I hear from Mrs. Tick. But, women! Who can believe ‘em? :-) Y’all probably get together at Bunko and discuss among yourselves what “stories” to use on your slow-witted husbands.
Sometimes I have to “sit” when I get up in the middle of the night. I have learned to reach around behind and check if the seat’s down. But I realize men are better at working complex mechanical devices with lots of moving parts... like a potty seat.
don’t hurt me
This is just a wild guess, mind you... but I bet you’re blonde!
>> Males pooping + females peeing + pooping = 3. Got it?
apparently... to an incorrect, shallow first-order approximation that assumes an even distribution of toilet events.
A better model would be:
Pseat = f(gender, diet, beerConsumption, scratchUrge)
where
gender = {male, female}
beerConsumption(male)=12; beerConsumption(female)=3.1
scratchUrge(male)=1; scratchUrge(female)=0
Clearly your model breaks down by assuming e(toilet), i.e. toilet events, are evenly distributed among #1 and #2.
But you fail to take into account the gross (!) differences in beerConsumption and scratchUrge among the gender=male cohort. (Footnote: scratchUrge can only be satisfied with seat = UP.)
The detailed mathematics* are left as an exercise for the reader, but it can be shown that lidUp toilet events occur at a frequency four to five times higher than lidDown events.
Therefore, lidUp = 5(1) = 5, whereas lidDown (as in your simple model) = 3 (and some researchers believe the ratio to be even higher).
The natural position of the lid is, as you can see from this analysis, UP.
*Males are MUCH better at math. That was your first mistake.
don’t hurt me
So, “she” doesn’t use “her” mouth to talk?
Okay...THAT is funny!
You do realize I am a female beer drinker and my husband doesn’t drink beer at all. Neither does my son - unless we wanted child protective services after us. SO...where does that leave me in my house?!
On 2nd thought, save your brain for more taxing problems, like whether the toilet paper roll is hung outsies or insies. :)
>> You do realize I am a female beer drinker and my husband doesn’t drink beer at all.
No, I didn’t.
>> SO...where does that leave me in my house?!
A statistical anomaly — i.e. the exception that proves the rule. Of course, we would have to have scratchUrge data to do the full computation.
>> On 2nd thought, save your brain for more taxing problems, like whether the toilet paper roll is hung outsies or insies.
Whoa! No thanks! Postdoc studies are above my pay grade.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.