Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Underwear packaging reportedly recalled from Walmart after Cullman pastorís complaint
Cullman Times (AL) ^ | July 23, 2010 | Trent Moore

Posted on 07/25/2010 5:55:57 AM PDT by notsofastmyfriend

CULLMAN — A local pastor’s complaint about a brand of underwear being sold with “pornographic” pictures on the packaging at the Cullman Walmart reportedly led to a recall of the product.

Frank Boren, pastor of New Hope Christian Center Church of God in the Springhill community, said he noticed the questionable underwear package while shopping at the store in May.

“I was in there shopping for some underwear one day, and looked at the men’s pictures on the packaging,” he said. “On a few of the packages they were very pornographic in the way they were dressed, in skimpy underwear, so I went to the manager and asked her if she thought it was inappropriate to be displayed.”

After filing a few more complaints in the following weeks, Boren said the questionable packaging eventually disappeared from the store’s shelves.

Cullman Walmart store manager Nancy Valentine said Boren’s concerns were forwarded to the corporate office, and an eventual recall of that packaging was likely the result of similar complaints.

“A customer was upset about the picture on the underwear packaging and we sent his concerns to the home office,” she said. “I believe there was a recall on that product packaging later on.”

Boren said he wanted to thank Valentine and Cullman County Sheriff Tyler Roden for their assistance in the matter.

When asked about his role in the reported recall, Roden said he listened to Boren’s complaint — though the issue mostly fell to the discretion of Walmart officials.

“He was concerned about the packaging on some of the men’s underwear being too revealing, in his opinion, to the point that he thought it was pornographic,” he said. “This gentleman voiced his concerns about that.”


TOPICS: Local News
KEYWORDS: 900footjesus; libertarians; medicalmarijuana
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
Sorry, no pictures of the offending "package" at the source.
1 posted on 07/25/2010 5:55:59 AM PDT by notsofastmyfriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: notsofastmyfriend

And Elvis was THE DEVIL!!!!


2 posted on 07/25/2010 5:57:16 AM PDT by NCBraveheart (BARACK OBAMA....A GIANT SACK OF SUCK!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: notsofastmyfriend

The jury should be considered hung until pictures of guilt or innocence are provided.


3 posted on 07/25/2010 5:58:43 AM PDT by Hang'emAll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCBraveheart

Maybe I should complain, one day I saw a tote bag at WalMart with the “Obama” painted all over the whole thing. Even tho it was marked down to $1 from the original price, no one was buying!!! Eventually they all disappeared....but this is evidence of his popularity, no one buys him for even $1.


4 posted on 07/25/2010 6:00:37 AM PDT by GrannyK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: notsofastmyfriend
Pornography is in the eye of the beholder.

I think we're too "offended" by things in our society, but if Wal-Mart saw enough of a concern to remove the items that's their decision, possibly a good business decision.

5 posted on 07/25/2010 6:01:50 AM PDT by infidel29 (Since 0bama is NOT a uniter, can we change the acronym to just plain P.O.S.?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCBraveheart

I noticed the underwear packages one day when I was waiting for a son to try something on. Men’s string bikinis? It might not be pornographic, but it’s pretty darn gross.


6 posted on 07/25/2010 6:02:53 AM PDT by Tax-chick ("I hate other cultures. Everyone is rude and they never wash or use deodorant."~Anoreth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: notsofastmyfriend

SO, they’re still going to sell the offensive “pornographic” skimpy underwear, just not going to show people what it really looks like?

I’d really have to see this offending package to figure out what the hubbub is.
Did they just pull the packages from that one store?


7 posted on 07/25/2010 6:04:34 AM PDT by nuconvert ( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
Men’s string bikinis? It might not be pornographic,.....

Hey, guys want to feel pretty too! /s

8 posted on 07/25/2010 6:05:21 AM PDT by Popman (Why does the New Black Panther Party want to kill saltines ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: notsofastmyfriend

Geez man, all you have to do is look at most of the people
in the stores if you want to be offended. I’ve been waiting for them to post signs, no animals or wildlife permitted in the stores! lol


9 posted on 07/25/2010 6:05:40 AM PDT by Average Al
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Popman

They would work for me if I were 20 years younger, 20 pounds lighter, athletic, toned, good looking, etc, etc....

To borrow from Diamonds Are Forever’s Shady Tree - I have the body of Rock Hudson. If he knew what I was doing to it, he would be mad as hell.


10 posted on 07/25/2010 6:09:41 AM PDT by wally_bert (It's sheer elegance in its simplicity! - The Middleman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

Well if you want to see gross, walk behind a woman wearing
string bikini underwear (or no underwear) under summer shorts or pants. Their cheeks juggle like jello and the seem gets caught way up in their butt crack.....Gross.


11 posted on 07/25/2010 6:10:46 AM PDT by Average Al
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: notsofastmyfriend
pornographic

You would have to stretch the definition pretty thin then to say a man dressed in underwear posing on a package are pornographic.

You might call it risqué, crude or offensive, but even in the eye of the beholder standard, it's still a stretch unless you get aroused by it .................which is a whole different topic

12 posted on 07/25/2010 6:11:44 AM PDT by Popman (Why does the New Black Panther Party want to kill saltines ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

Well if you want to see gross, walk behind a woman wearing
string bikini underwear (or no underwear) under summer shorts or pants. Their cheeks juggle like jello and the (seam) gets caught way up in their butt crack.....Gross.


13 posted on 07/25/2010 6:12:18 AM PDT by Average Al
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: infidel29
Pornography is in the eye of the beholder.

I am really personally sick of this attitude and offer no compromise. The foolishness of living on the edge of what is right or wrong is beyond words. I don't care if anyone agrees with me on the matter or not.

Either one ideology or the other has to go. God says he doesn't approve of that attitude and ultimately He is going effect his will whether you or anyone else believes He will or not. God is going to have to apologize to Sodom and Gomorrah or do something about the increasingly blatant immoral attitude of this nation, it has been said in a backwards sort of way.

15 posted on 07/25/2010 6:14:49 AM PDT by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin (Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Popman
Try going to Spencer Gifts and looking at what they are carrying these days, dildos, vibrators, exotic outfits etc.
16 posted on 07/25/2010 6:15:02 AM PDT by Average Al
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: notsofastmyfriend

Sounds like Frank Boren has some latent homosexual issues.


17 posted on 07/25/2010 6:16:25 AM PDT by humblegunner (Pablo is very wily)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hang'emAll
“I was in there shopping for some underwear one day, and looked at the men’s pictures on the packaging,” he said. “On a few of the packages they were very pornographic in the way they were dressed, in skimpy underwear

Perhaps the models were hung, hence the complaint about the packaging of the packages.

18 posted on 07/25/2010 6:18:12 AM PDT by RoseyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RoseyT

Well then circumstantial evidence points to guilty.


19 posted on 07/25/2010 6:22:47 AM PDT by Hang'emAll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: notsofastmyfriend

Ye ole Sears/MonkeyWard/JCPenny catalogs predated Victoria’s Secret.

Many a young lad and lass perused those publications.


20 posted on 07/25/2010 6:27:18 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson