Skip to comments.
Super Capacitor Could Power Phone, Laptop for Days
Discovery ^
| 8/31/10
| Eric Bland
Posted on 09/01/2010 1:34:35 PM PDT by LibWhacker
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
To: ShadowAce
2
posted on
09/01/2010 1:41:52 PM PDT
by
KoRn
(Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
To: LibWhacker
Supercapacitor technology is the golden key for making low energy density sources like wind/solar/tidal cost effective.
3
posted on
09/01/2010 1:44:00 PM PDT
by
pingman
(Price is what you pay, value is what you get.)
To: LibWhacker
“Drawing on the layered design of tear-inducing onions,”
A superb non sequitur! A double if you consider onions and batteries!
Anyone read Riverworld by P H Farmer? Giant batacitors ran a paddlewheel river vessel.
4
posted on
09/01/2010 1:44:54 PM PDT
by
DBrow
To: pingman
“low energy density” = low density energy
mea culpa
5
posted on
09/01/2010 1:45:13 PM PDT
by
pingman
(Price is what you pay, value is what you get.)
To: LibWhacker
Someday they will power the automobile.
6
posted on
09/01/2010 1:45:17 PM PDT
by
jonrick46
(We're being water boarded with the sewage of Fabian Socialism.)
To: LibWhacker
“they can discharge up to 200 volts every second.”
Nonsensical use of units.
7
posted on
09/01/2010 1:47:09 PM PDT
by
DBrow
To: LibWhacker
8
posted on
09/01/2010 1:51:02 PM PDT
by
ßuddaßudd
(7 days - 7 ways Guero >>> with a floating, shifting, ever changing persona.....)
To: LibWhacker
IF optimized and IF commercialized
Two mighty big IFs
To: LibWhacker
If commercialized, the new super capacitor could be fully charged in a second and, coupled to a normal battery, provide enough energy to power a cell phone for weeks or a laptop battery for days. "If commercialized," the two most significant words in the article. What happens when a super capacitor shorts out?
10
posted on
09/01/2010 1:56:47 PM PDT
by
Moonman62
(Politicians exist to break windows so they may spend other people's money to fix them.)
To: LibWhacker
I am hearing more and more about graphene. Looks like a breakthrough nanotechnology material.
My understanding about the supercapacitors, or any capacitors is that the amount of energy they can store depends on the amount of surface area. I compare them to lungs in that sense. If they can cram enough surface area into a capacitor, it could revolutionize portable electric power.
Imagine an electric car with a 1000 mile range between charges and it only takes five minutes to charge. Careful not to touch any wires though.
11
posted on
09/01/2010 1:57:17 PM PDT
by
RobRoy
(The US Today: Revelation 18:4)
To: DBrow
Good catch. You’d think Discovery would employ writers who knew at least a little something about science.
12
posted on
09/01/2010 1:58:03 PM PDT
by
LibWhacker
(America awake!)
To: DBrow
Watching a reporter discuss electrical engineering is like watching a monkey talk. You're amazed that he does it at all but don't expect him to do it correctly.
13
posted on
09/01/2010 1:59:51 PM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(Gun control was originally to protect Klansmen from their victims. The basic reason hasn't changed.)
To: LibWhacker
However, in contrast to batteries, a capacitor cannot store enough energy to power anything that lasts longer than a flash -- some fraction of a second. Has this author ever heard of an RC time constant? Or understand the concept of three times tau?
I thought not.
Standard capacitors can discharge much more slowly than "some fraction of a second".
14
posted on
09/01/2010 2:01:53 PM PDT
by
politicket
(1 1/2 million attended Obama's coronation - only 14 missed work!)
To: DBrow
They should have used Joules.....
Actually watts
15
posted on
09/01/2010 2:02:42 PM PDT
by
GraceG
To: LibWhacker
[Good catch. Youd think Discovery would employ writers who knew at least a little something about science. ]
The writer probably had to exit the building in a hurry before they could spell and fact check their article.
16
posted on
09/01/2010 2:04:02 PM PDT
by
GraceG
To: Moonman62
To: Moonman62
Depends on the internal resistance. I have some supercapacitors here on my workbench that get hot if you short them out. The lower the internal resistance, the more current they can produce, but in general, for a shorter time.
18
posted on
09/01/2010 2:08:32 PM PDT
by
backwoods-engineer
(There is no "common good" which minimizes or sacrifices the individual. --Walter Scott Hudson)
To: GraceG
They should have used Joules.....
Didn't you read the article? Diamonds are precious joules.
To: DallasMike
I posted this pic first !!! I win
20
posted on
09/01/2010 2:13:02 PM PDT
by
Scythian
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson