Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

5th Grade Math Help
CA State Approved 5th Grade Math | Sep 15, 2010 | Me

Posted on 09/15/2010 8:41:36 PM PDT by Fundamentally Fair

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last
To: Cap&Ball
-- It's an illusion ... --

The illustration shows "projecting" fractions onto a common line (the top line).

The technique works, regardless of where, vertically, the segmented/fraction lines are drawn.

Some kids might have the light go on, seeing this, but most won't.

61 posted on 09/16/2010 11:18:33 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Fundamentally Fair
-- The notches aren't the same distance though... --

I don't know if the student is taught, or is expected to figure out a way to "commonize" different length "wholes."

One of the "wholes" is a number line carved into 6ths, the other (a different "whole" length) is carved into 8ths. The student should know that a direct comparison won't work, because the "wholes" are not the same length. Either one line has to be stretched, or the other shrunk. That right triangle figure that includes two "wholes" is one way to accomplish this equalization.

If I was teaching this to my kids, I'd describe the projection as a shadow. The shorter line has to be "closer to the light" in order to make the sames size shadow as the longer line. The comparison of is made at the "common length shadow," not at the line.

62 posted on 09/16/2010 11:32:07 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
If I was teaching this to my kids, I'd describe the projection as a shadow.

As would I, but that would be beyond standard 5th grade math. IMHO based on my 5th grader.

63 posted on 09/16/2010 11:39:50 AM PDT by Fundamentally Fair (If exercising the right to free speech invites violence, then girls in short skirts invite rape.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Fundamentally Fair
-- As would I, but that would be beyond standard 5th grade math. --

I think a 5th grader could learn it. Unless the idea of "bigger/smaller" fractions is too advanced.

Simple examples first. Half of a pot pie, vs. half of an apple pie (the pot pie being a small item). Either way, half is a half.

Next example, half of an inch compared with half of a foot. Obviously, half of a foot is longer, but the question is which is a bigger fraction. half=half, so the fractions are the same.

Next step, find a way to compare half and inch and half a foot, "on the same line." Or, "stretch the inch." I'd do that by drawing the triangle, and a line bisecting the bottom angle. The bisector meets at the half point of any horizontal line (segment). Could go up to half a mile, if the paper was big enough.

Then ask about a way to compare unlike fractions on unlike length lines. See if the kid sees the application of the "half=half" method.

64 posted on 09/16/2010 12:09:37 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Fundamentally Fair

“See post 18. Agree? I’m senseing some sarcasm...”

No, No. I’m just terrible at math and thinking my son had just called saying his 4th grader got a B in math last year, but can’t remember to “borrow” this year, and says she hasn’t learned yet to subtract from zeros by borrowing. She is struggling and gets a B?


65 posted on 09/16/2010 1:22:18 PM PDT by RitaOK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Fundamentally Fair

Yes, after I saw the “triangulation” method diagram someone posted, I understand what they’re getting at. But, even though that method could work with number lines that are out of scale, you’d still need the individual segments of each line to be equidistant, which is another thing you are never supposed to assume with number lines.

Basically, by teaching this method, they probably figure they are making it easier for kids than the old “common denominator” method, but they are actually teaching kids to disregard a couple basic principles of mathematics.


66 posted on 09/16/2010 2:58:59 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: ConservaTexan

I have to disagree with you here. The metric system is far superior - and makes sense. The lobs have nothing to do with it. It’s been in use in sciences for nearly 200 years because it just works better. Now we could talk about the problem of 60 seconds in a minute, but that’s already been a standard since the Babylonians or Sumerians or whomever decided it, but there is no reason to be counting base-12 at all. The big problem with is question is that no one would ever divide a meter into 8 segments, it would always be base-10, so 4/6 and 5/8 doesn’t necessarily exist in practical use of the metric system. The question is should refer to each as base-10, ie; 5/10 and 6/10, then it all becomes clear, and that is why the metric system works so well. Common denominators should be apied here, but the OP did say that was a follow up lesson, so perhaps this question was meant to be misleading on purpose. Regardless, its a horrible question to ask in hopes of furthering a student’s understanding of real numbers. This should have at least had the lines and segments the same length.


67 posted on 09/17/2010 10:37:47 AM PDT by lefty-lie-spy (Stay metal. For the Horde \m/("_")\m/ - via iPhone from Tokyo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: zeebee

Well met.


68 posted on 08/17/2011 8:28:20 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson