Nope. Once again you fail Logic 101.
Fact: we didn't nuke Pakistan. In contrast, your claim is that my theory is "totally unsupported by any facts while contradicting all known facts."
Nope. I just gave you one fact that supports my theory. There are more.
I don't see any point in arguing this further. It's clear you think I'm wrong, and it's clear that no amount of evidence is going to convince you that you are wrong.
But, it's been interesting. Thank you.
Here's the thing, Ed. You *can't* let it go. Oh sure, you can *pretend* that you are running away from this discussion, but the reality is that you have to keep coming back to respond every time that I poke holes in your cover story.
I thought we were just going in circles. But then you provided an explanation for why you believe the U.S. government framed Bruce Ivins: to protect Pakistan.
That was NEW. I had to respond.
I'll continue to respond as long as it isn't the same arguments over and over and over. If it's the same arguments over and over and over, then I'm done.