No, and we covered this in the above posts already, so you are simply killing time by repeating agitprop.
Yes, there were anthrax letters sent to ABC and CBS.
No, there was no an anthrax letter sent to the AMI building in Florida.
It's the AMI building's anthrax contamination in Florida that shows that Ivins (who had no connection to it) didn't do the anthrax attacks.
Of course, there are other ways to contaminate a building with anthrax besides in a letter.
Rent money, for example, can do the same. Anthrax sticks to paper cash just like cocaine sticks to it.
...and who was paying rent money in cash to the wife of an employee at the AMI building in Florida?
The 9/11 terrorists.
Now just keep in mind that EdLake claims that not a single fact supports my view.
In short, EdLake is saying that the 9/11 terrorists weren't renting an apartment from the wife of an AMI building employee (a fact). EdLake is saying that the 9/11 terrorists didn't pay their rent in cash to said wife (another fact). EdLake is claiming that anthrax doesn't stick to paper money like cocaine (yet another fact).
Fact after fact supports my view.