Disclosure is, apparently, upon us.
Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.
Posted on 09/27/2010 1:34:18 PM PDT by marbren
(NECN: Washington) - A press conference was held this afternoon at the National Press Club in Washington, where at least a dozen former U.S. Air Force personnel, mostly officers who worked on secret projects connected to sensitive nuclear weapons sites, are admitting that they were privy to UFO and alien-related incidents -- that occurred during their time of service.
In this clip, you will hear from: Retired Air Force Captain Robert Salas, Former Air Force Lieutenant Colonel Dwayne Arneson and Former Air Force Official Bill Jameson
(Excerpt) Read more at necn.com ...
VERY WELL PUT.
THX THX.
LONG DAY.
Heading for shower and bed.
Thx all.
It’s not fun. We’ll sometimes. Just make sure a few facts don’t get messed up. Was I an employee at Nevada Test Site....Yes. Was it kinda secret...Yes. Was it for security of information......Yes. Is it still secure.....Yes.
The distinction I am making is between the translations made before the Dead Sea Scrolls were discovered in 1946 - and the translations made after which included those insights.
Major English Translations of Enoch:
I must be missing something because I don’t get the connection between your work history, the seriousness of the disclosure these credible men have given, and your derision of the topic.
Disclosure is, apparently, upon us.
If you have a sentence or two tell me about that derision and how you see it.
No telling. Enough, Phhhhttt.
Iran unveils radar evading flying boats....video link below..thought you might be interested.
I saw the big triangle coming home from work one night directly over me on highway 80 between Tombstone and Bisbee. A truly massive semi transparent obsidian thing. The air was crackling around me when I pulled over and got out of the car to look up at it. I was stunned and speechless.
I don't know if they're et or not and I really don't understand people that automatically assume that if you say you've seen something, they think you mean little green men. I rather prefer a more terrestrial explanation - breakaway civilization with technology decades ahead of what we currently are familiar with.
Not sure why you pinged me with this - I could probably figure it out a bit better if you weren’t so incoherent.
Thanks thanks.
I think I’d best link these posts of yours to my home page, too.
There’s a lot in the public domain about such areas.
I suspect you could refer to such public domain stuff enough to say what . . . spheres of activity . . . or around what types of objects or critters you may have worked around . . . at least in general public domain terms.
My relative has not been bothered by the powers that be for his revelations—which he refrained from until most everything he had direct awareness of was essentially in the public domain anyway.
I also think
“still secure”
could be an extremely relative phrase.
Interesting point about the language.
Thanks for the ping. It’s pretty interesting alright. Maybe more will be revealed or additional others collaborate these disclosures.
At some point you have to come to the conclusion that something is up.
Well put . . . though some willfully blind seem to avoid such rational conclusions somehow.
I wouldn’t call it derision . . . more like humor about a challenging topic that’s . . . in ways . . . more serious than most of us prefer . . . more so than is easy for many to be comfortable with.
Kind of like the black humor of operating room medical personnel.
Thanks.
Interesting to a point.
I’d guess that we have a dozen different systems that could take such craft out of the air/commission in a flash from great distance.
And they won’t evade some of our sensors at all.
THANKS THANKS.
I’d much prefer a terrestrial explanation. However, too much data just do not fit that explanation.
It’s not that difficult.
I’m sorry I didn’t make my request in shorter sentences and shorter words. I’ll try again.
1. Perhaps, maybe, possibly you’d grace us with the extreme, great, big kindness of viewing, seeing, watching 20 minutes or more of the National Press Club Conference from Monday on one of those links.
Which being translated could be states as:
1.1 Maybe you’ll get off your high horse lone enough to view 20 minutes or more of the videos of the conference.
2. THEN perhaps, maybe, possibly you’d give to us poor serfs and slaves the huge, extreme, great, big unworthy gift of your high, lofty, unreachable, awe triggering viewpoint on said presentations.
Which being interpreted might be stated as:
2.1 THEN you might bother telling those of us ungods what a lofty creature like you thinks of such presentations.
3. Perhaps, maybe, possibly THEN, SOME FREEPERS will be struck kowtowing faces to the floor in awe-struck dumb-foundment at your smart, brilliant, great, huge amount of cleverness and uncommon, rare, special understanding and instructive description.
Which could be translated as saying something like:
3.1 Maybe then 1 or 2 FREEPERS more clueless than you will faint dumbstruck on the floor from reading a response from Your Greatness.
I hope that’s clearer. If not, don’t bother. I don’t think I can make it any clearer.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.