Posted on 12/28/2010 8:09:02 AM PST by The_Tick_01
Is Christina Hendricks too fat? I don’t know. Does Baskin Robbins have too many flavors? Is Rudolph’s nose too shiny? Was Mother Theresa selfless? Are the fellas from the National Organization of Women too shrill and judgmental?
Well okay, the answer to that last one is “yes”, but any guy with a functional “Y” chromosome and an IQ higher than of the average Sponge Bob character would answer a resounding “NO” regarding the lovely Ms. Hendricks and the state of her figure. Ever since she appeared on the hit AMC show “Mad Men”, Christina has done for the male population as a whole what Viagra is supposed to do for men in the throes of a raging midlife crisis. Of course her curvaceous figure is a break from what has become the accepted norm, and that means that the media is going to push back against this curvy anomaly.
Last January Christina Hendricks showed up that the Golden Globe Awards in a ruffled dress from designer Christian Siriano. New York Times fashion blogger, Cathy Horyn, quoted a stylist who said regarding Christina that “You don’t put a big girl in a big dress. That’s rule number one.” By now most of us know that the terms like “Husky”, “Rubenesque”, and “Big Girl” are just code words for “fat ass”.
(Excerpt) Read more at rightnetwork.com ...
So many young women today are like icicles — cold and hard. There is little feminine warmth or softness about them, thanks to the feminist movement. The anorexic, athletic look is only a natural progression.
As I’ve said, “curvy” has been hijacked from its original meaning. Would you be able to a post a pic of what you find ideal, or at least attractive? Thanks.
Take a gander at any of the women painted by the masters.
That would be a good start.
Winner!!
Like these?
http://www.pollogen.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/Rubens-The-Three-Graces-.jpg
http://employees.oneonta.edu/farberas/arth/Images/110images/sl9images/titian_venus_urbino.jpg
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ZHcZUnoudXA/Rj-9v430_iI/AAAAAAAAAFg/uNrNARS-8hc/s1600-h/rubens88.jpg
The second one would be a good example.
How can ANYONE look at THAT (the gif of CH’s rear waist and shoulders) and consider her fat?
An hourglass figure is what it is called boys and girls.
Learn it, live it, LOVE it!
Okay. Now, I am wondering how she found a party gown that doesn’t show her belly or isn’t too tight around the bust. I am about the same size and it’s been a pain to find anything that fits right and doesn’t annoy me when it comes to a formal.
>> “An hourglass figure is what it is called boys and girls.” <<
.
And some of the girls are apparently jealous.
.
Is anyone going to claim they photoshoped that filmed sequence of her rear and waist? Pulled in a “stunt butt”?
No. That is 100% CH. And it looks 100% tasty!
>> “ I am about the same size and it’s been a pain to find anything that fits right and doesn’t annoy me when it comes to a formal.” <<
.
Or you’re too hard to please?
Relax, you’ve nothing to sweat.
Nothing posted to this thread has been tampered with.
.
>> Serena Williams has “curves” <<
.
And legs!
.
Cankles. No muscle tone whatsoever.
I know some people like that, but it’s not at all what I strive for.
Not”extra large,” just normal.
Cankles my a$$!
Bitter jealousy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.