Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New math theories reveal the nature of numbers
Emory University ^ | January 20, 2011 | Unknown

Posted on 01/20/2011 7:35:04 AM PST by decimon

Finite formula found for partition numbers

For centuries, some of the greatest names in math have tried to make sense of partition numbers, the basis for adding and counting. Many mathematicians added major pieces to the puzzle, but all of them fell short of a full theory to explain partitions. Instead, their work raised more questions about this fundamental area of math.

On Friday, Emory mathematician Ken Ono will unveil new theories that answer these famous old questions.

Ono and his research team have discovered that partition numbers behave like fractals. They have unlocked the divisibility properties of partitions, and developed a mathematical theory for "seeing" their infinitely repeating superstructure. And they have devised the first finite formula to calculate the partitions of any number.

"Our work brings completely new ideas to the problems," says Ono, who will explain the findings in a public lecture at 8 p.m. Friday on the Emory campus. "We prove that partition numbers are 'fractal' for every prime. These numbers, in a way we make precise, are self-similar in a shocking way. Our 'zooming' procedure resolves several open conjectures, and it will change how mathematicians study partitions."

The work was funded by the American Institute of Mathematics (AIM) and the National Science Foundation. Last year, AIM assembled the world's leading experts on partitions, including Ono, to attack some of the remaining big questions in the field. Ono, who is a chaired professor at both Emory and the University of Wisconsin at Madison, led a team consisting of Jan Bruinier, from the Technical University of Darmstadt in Germany; Amanda Folsom, from Yale; and Zach Kent, a post-doctoral fellow at Emory.

"Ken Ono has achieved absolutely breathtaking breakthroughs in the theory of partitions," says George Andrews, professor at Pennsylvania State University and president of the American Mathematical Society. "He proved divisibility properties of the basic partition function that are astounding. He went on to provide a superstructure that no one anticipated just a few years ago. He is a phenomenon."

Child's play

On the surface, partition numbers seem like mathematical child's play. A partition of a number is a sequence of positive integers that add up to that number. For example, 4 = 3+1 = 2+2 = 2+1+1 = 1+1+1+1. So we say there are 5 partitions of the number 4.

It sounds simple, and yet the partition numbers grow at an incredible rate. The amount of partitions for the number 10 is 42. For the number 100, the partitions explode to more than 190,000,000.

"Partition numbers are a crazy sequence of integers which race rapidly off to infinity," Ono says. "This provocative sequence evokes wonder, and has long fascinated mathematicians."

By definition, partition numbers are tantalizingly simple. But until the breakthroughs by Ono's team, no one was unable to unlock the secret of the complex pattern underlying this rapid growth.

The work of 18th-century mathematician Leonhard Euler led to the first recursive technique for computing the partition values of numbers. The method was slow, however, and impractical for large numbers. For the next 150 years, the method was only successfully implemented to compute the first 200 partition numbers.

"In the mathematical universe, that's like not being able to see further than Mars," Ono says.

A mathematical telescope

In the early 20th century, Srinivasa Ramanujan and G. H. Hardy invented the circle method, which yielded the first good approximation of the partitions for numbers beyond 200. They essentially gave up on trying to find an exact answer, and settled for an approximation.

"This is like Galileo inventing the telescope, allowing you to see beyond what the naked eye can see, even though the view may be dim," Ono says.

Ramanujan also noted some strange patterns in partition numbers. In 1919 he wrote: "There appear to be corresponding properties in which the moduli are powers of 5, 7 or 11 … and no simple properties for any moduli involving primes other than these three."

The legendary Indian mathematician died at the age of 32 before he could explain what he meant by this mysterious quote, now known as Ramanujan's congruences.

In 1937, Hans Rademacher found an exact formula for calculating partition values. While the method was a big improvement over Euler's exact formula, it required adding together infinitely many numbers that have infinitely many decimal places. "These numbers are gruesome," Ono says.

In the ensuing decades, mathematicians have kept building on these breakthroughs, adding more pieces to the puzzle. Despite the advances, they were unable to understand Ramanujan's enigmatic words, or find a finite formula for the partition numbers.

Seeing the forest

Ono's "dream team" wrestled with the problems for months. "Everything we tried didn't work," he says.

A eureka moment happened in September, when Ono and Zach Kent were hiking to Tallulah Falls in northern Georgia. As they walked through the woods, noticing patterns in clumps of trees, Ono and Kent began thinking about what it would be like to "walk" through partition numbers.

"We were standing on some huge rocks, where we could see out over this valley and hear the falls, when we realized partition numbers are fractal," Ono says. "We both just started laughing."

The term fractal was invented in 1980 by Benoit Mandelbrot, to describe what seem like irregularities in the geometry of natural forms. The more a viewer zooms into "rough" natural forms, the clearer it becomes that they actually consist of repeating patterns. Not only are fractals beautiful, they have immense practical value in fields as diverse as art to medicine.

Their hike sparked a theory that reveals a new class of fractals, one that dispensed with the problem of infinity. "It's as though we no longer needed to see all the stars in the universe, because the pattern that keeps repeating forever can be seen on a three-mile walk to Tallulah Falls," Ono says.

Ramanujan's congruences are explained by their fractal theory. The team also demonstrated that the divisibility properties of partition numbers are "fractal" for every prime. "The sequences are all eventually periodic, and they repeat themselves over and over at precise intervals," Ono says. "It's like zooming in on the Mandelbrot set," he adds, referring to the most famous fractal of them all.

The oracle

But this extraordinary view into the superstructure of partition numbers was not enough. The team was determined go beyond mere theories and hit upon a formula that could be implemented in the real world.

The final eureka moment occurred near another Georgia landmark: Spaghetti Junction. Ono and Jan Bruinier were stuck in traffic near the notorious Atlanta interchange. While chatting in the car, they hit upon a way to overcome the infinite complexity of Rademacher's method. They went on to prove a formula that requires only finitely many simple numbers.

"We found a function, that we call P, that is like a magical oracle," Ono says. "I can take any number, plug it into P, and instantly calculate the partitions of that number. P does not return gruesome numbers with infinitely many decimal places. It's the finite, algebraic formula that we have all been looking for."

###

The work by Ono and his colleagues resulted in two papers that will be available soon on the AIM website.

For more sciences news from Emory, visit: www.emory.edu/esciencecommons.


TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: math; mathematics; pythagoras; pythagorean; pythagoreans; science; stringtheory
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last
Galileo and the telescope should be irrelevant.
1 posted on 01/20/2011 7:35:06 AM PST by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

For the trees ping.


2 posted on 01/20/2011 7:40:52 AM PST by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

3 posted on 01/20/2011 7:42:40 AM PST by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet - Visualize)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

Although I am an educated man, it is humbling to me when I realize that I don’t even understand this (presumably) simplified layman’s explanation of what these mathematicians are thinking about.

Further, I am astounded that one of my kids has a degree in aeronautical engineering and used to tutor college students in math and physics.

He must get it from his mother’s side of the family.


4 posted on 01/20/2011 7:44:14 AM PST by paterfamilias
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

In the fourth paragraph, the term “8 p.m. Friday” appears. Mathmatically, I understand this. The rest...not so much.


5 posted on 01/20/2011 7:44:21 AM PST by Onelifetogive (I tweet, too...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

“We were standing on some huge rocks, where we could see out over this valley and hear the falls, when we realized partition numbers are fractal,” Ono says. “We both just started laughing.”

Um. OK.


6 posted on 01/20/2011 7:47:40 AM PST by dinoparty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

This may help.

From Wikipedia:

In number theory, a partition of a positive integer n, also called an integer partition, is a way of writing n as a sum of positive integers.

The partitions of 4 are listed below:

1. 4
2. 3 + 1
3. 2 + 2
4. 2 + 1 + 1
5. 1 + 1 + 1 + 1


7 posted on 01/20/2011 7:52:29 AM PST by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Onelifetogive

Mathematically, yes. Culturally? 8PM Friday night is not usually considered the time to do heavy math.


8 posted on 01/20/2011 7:53:58 AM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dinoparty
“We were standing on some huge rocks, where we could see out over this valley and hear the falls, when we realized partition numbers are fractal,” Ono says. “We both just started laughing.”

Um. OK.


What tha hell? Makes them sound like a couple of stoners.
9 posted on 01/20/2011 7:56:15 AM PST by youngidiot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Onelifetogive
In the fourth paragraph, the term “8 p.m. Friday” appears.

Let's see, that's 7 p.m. + 1 p.m., 4 p.m. + 4 p.m, 8 a.m. + ...

10 posted on 01/20/2011 7:58:24 AM PST by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: decimon

Same article with pictures:

http://esciencecommons.blogspot.com/?


11 posted on 01/20/2011 7:58:58 AM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: youngidiot

There are few things that produce a bigger high than discovering/knowing something no one else on earth knows.


12 posted on 01/20/2011 8:02:09 AM PST by null and void (We are now in day 730 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DManA

Thanks. That second picture needs a “And then a miracle happens!” balloon. ;-)


13 posted on 01/20/2011 8:13:31 AM PST by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: All
Just random thoughts!

Look all around. Where do you see a triangle, a square, a rectangle except in the works of man. All of man's works require balance...something possible with regular objects.

But God balances the Universe with irregular objects.

How does he do it??

14 posted on 01/20/2011 8:18:10 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: youngidiot
What tha hell? Makes them sound like a couple of stoners.

I have a relative who works on the Large Hadron Collider at CERN. He doesn't live on planet earth. Totally "out there" dude. He's so damn smart that he comes across as mildly impaired.

15 posted on 01/20/2011 8:18:19 AM PST by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: decimon

16 posted on 01/20/2011 8:31:53 AM PST by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

So, what are the practical, real world applications/uses of being able to determine the number of partitions of large number?


17 posted on 01/20/2011 8:49:00 AM PST by Washi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Washi

It helps you pick up chicks?


18 posted on 01/20/2011 8:53:02 AM PST by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Washi
So, what are the practical, real world applications/uses of being able to determine the number of partitions of large number?

Beats me. What are the practical, real world applications/uses of the Laplace transform?

19 posted on 01/20/2011 8:56:05 AM PST by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: decimon

I love this stuff, even though I can’t pretend to grasp it much beyond the sock puppet level.


20 posted on 01/20/2011 9:00:02 AM PST by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson