Posted on 01/21/2011 8:08:39 AM PST by PilotDave
Now Rush is leading off with the story...
Ignorance is fixable but stupid you are just stuck with!
Wouldn’t that pic’s reference lead one to conclude that it’s “W”’s fault?
I believe that the last ad hominem "argument" wins. Doesn't it?
Rush Limbaugh is all over this now on his show ... he is talking about Abercommie.
We would need a new bureaucracy to write checks? What happened to the old bureaucracies?
I rarely listen to him because he seems to enjoy offending devout Christians.
************************************************
What do you expect from a pro-abort with a chip on his shoulder?
The Democratic Party of Hawaii refused to put Obama’s name on the Hawaii ballot due to ineligibility in 2008. Nancy Pelosi then perjured herself and sent a nomination letter to the Supervisor of Elections in HI stating that Barack Obama was eligible to be on the ballot under the Constitution of the USA. He then arbitraily decided to place Obama’s name on the ballot using a Hawaii statute that allows the Elections Supervisor to make a decison if there are 2 competing opinions of a candidate’s eligibility. Nancy Pelosi then send a different letter to the other 49 states omitting the part about being elibible under the Constitution.
Fraud in Hawaii to be exposed. See how these two stories tie together if you will...
New analysis of Democrat Party’s official 2008 Certification of Nominations for Obama reveals that reasons for his sudden trip to Hawaii in October, 2008 were to visit more than just his sick grandmother. Hawaiian election laws, media accounts and post-dated documents reveal he may have attended a private hearing with the Hawaiian Chief Elections Officer regarding his disqualification from the Hawaiian ballot due to lack of certified Constitutional eligibility.
http://thedailypen.blogspot.com/
Many question why officials in Hawaii would lie to cover for Obama...
Obama X marks the spot
http://lamecherry.blogspot.com/2011/01/obama-x-marks-spot.html
Rush is also discussing it now.
We would need a new bureaucracy to write checks? What happened to the old bureaucracies?
What is old is new...”same as the old boss” (The Who).
Boortz is talking about a monthly check to every household in the U.S. You think that's going to be administered by fewer people than we already have writing them?
I think it is about both. He has yet to prove he was born in the USA. There is a lot of circumstantial evidence that would not be admissible in court that he was born here, but then, there is a lot that he wasn’t.
I would like to see both issues addressed, but either one could make the other mute, although the both reinforce each other and the point that Barry Soetoro/Barack Hussein Abdhullah Obama is a fraud and con-artist.
Using the old bureaus would require you to sign up for Medicare before you could get your check. Just ask them.
I’m listening to Rush now. This will make it VERY hard for the MSM to ignore it.
You took your ad hominem shots on this thread and I responded in kind! You stop and I will stop. Otherwise NO DEAL!
I’m listening to Rush now. This will make it VERY hard for the MSM to ignore it.
Chrissy Matthews to call Rush a “birther” tonight on his show?
It would be administered by the very same folks who currently send out all those social security checks! No new agency needed!
A fact you would know if you actually KNEW anything about the subject!
Only if you admit that you are posting under the influence or that you went first (started down the path).
Arthur may or may not have been a Natural born citizen ,it depends on what source of information you use. here is some of the “facts” I encountered on my personal research.
1. Arthur was born in Ireland
2. Arthur was born in Canada
3. Arthur used the birth date of a younger brother
4. Arthur’s father became naturalized when he(Arthur) was
year old.
5. Arthur was 14 years old when his father was naturalized.
It amuses me that liberals continue to use Arthur as a example, his opponent tried to have him removed from the election on the grounds that his father was not a Natural Born citizen. It’s clear that in the 1800’s both parents had to be U.S. a citizens to be considered Natural Born. NO law has been passed to change the meaning.
THERE WAS A QUESTION ON WHETHER ;OR NOT ARTHUR WAS A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN , THERE IS NO QUESTION THAT OBAMA IS NOT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN. obama IS NOT ,NOR EVER CAN BE THE LEGAL PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.