Skip to comments.Obama Birth Certificate Scam? 2011-04-27 Obama.mp4
Posted on 04/27/2011 9:05:08 PM PDT by remaxagnt
100% proof this document is a fraud!
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
Must ‘a been those berries that eked out of his butt that day.
I watched this video after you mentioned it in a different thread that I had started. Thanks for starting this thread yourself - now I don’t have to!
I don’t know. But the image that is on the paper obviously is rolled on the left side. How does that fit into the equation? Do they scan from a book and print it on the paper that already has a background on it? Or is it printed at the same time as the image. We need a unbiased expert to examine the original. Trump has the resources to get that done. Leave it to obumber to half ass answer the question.
I knew something was up when I saw the white edges around all of the graphics when I blew up the image.
That should say “The American Lap-Dog-Media Are FREAKIN’ IDIOTS!”
Karl Denninger again. This is absolutely the best and most convincing presentation yet. Very much worth watching the video—and in my case watching it twice, before sending it out to my list.
The AP version was copied from a piece of paper, whether or not the paper was faked. The White House Version was ASSEMBLED, and it was done partly using a color scanner and partly using a black and white scanner, and then putting them together.
No doubt about it. The White House version simply is NOT a simple scan of a piece of paper. The evidence is overwhelming.
Last week, Hawaii suddenly stopped allowing folks to obtain their Long-Form BC.
Are they worried that other BC’s, floating around town, would allow us to compare with Omoslem’s BC (and spot problems)?
Bump for later reference. Thanks
Man, I just want to know the truth one way or the other. To be honest, I was almost relieved to find out he was eligible. But now there are questions again. This POS in the white house can not give a strait answer to anything.
So Obama must have been rattled by the birthers.
I knew something was up when all the usual faithers came out of the wood work proclaim this a dead issue. Put it under the scope first, then call it dead—not the other way around.
That’s MICROSCOPE by the way.
We’ve always known they’d forge a BC for him...what we worried about is the forgery would be soooooo gooooood...it would be next to impossible to prove it was forged...now look the these very stupid criminal thugs...they didn’t even fake a good forgery....
Me either. I'm getting whiplash.
On a couple of other threads, I was proposing logical explanations for a few things that people were excited about. (Most of which I got from other FReepers) I started to look into some other points that had me concerned to see if they, too, could be rationalized and then a thought hit me: How many oddities does it take before it's just too much of a stretch for anyone to buy that this document is legit?
I would say that three good weird things that have less than obvious explanations would be easily acceptable for me.
OK, then what about four? Five? Ten? Would I be able to accept more than a dozen things that point to an object being a fake if someone sat me down and said, "I know it looks wrong; but, you see..."
I quit counting "off points" at twelve a few hours ago.
But microfiche itself presented whole new problems in the manner of storage and even quicker solutions were presented, such as digitalizing the microfiche library and putting it in computer databases. Now long form birth certificates are a couple clicks away.
Once printed, stamped and dated, these documents can then be transmitted in electronic format from scanning printers that can convert a document to PDF for sending electronically. And this really appears to be pretty standard everywhere I've been (counties of 600,000+ people.)
The methodology that scanning copiers use to not only create PDFs, but also in storing documents for multiple printings breaks the image up into elements, and those elements are combined to make the PDF or the print. You can also specify a background image to go into the PDF - naturally you wouldn't have it in the original document, as that could affect the print onto the security paper.
This is his real long form birth certificate. Kudos to Trump to extract that which no one else could get him to cough up. And it does absolutely nothing to settle the question if Obama’s a naturally born citizen or not, aside from providing a legal record that his mother was under 25 at the time of his birth, and a legal establishment of his father. It does nothing to establish his father's US citizenship, a requirement for a naturally born citizen.
I honestly think that this is one of those cases where success in the past is affecting people's viewpoints. Yes, CBS faked a document. Continued declarations that this is a fake will just result in the registrar in Hawaii to post the ‘original’ that was scanned in a frame on the wall in their lobby. It is becoming a distraction whereas for the first time, Obama has provided the same type of documents that we're required to provide to get even welfare, much less the presidency. Now to go after those school records and immigration records for his father.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.