Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Comet Theory Comes Crashing to Earth
Miller-McCune ^ | 5-14-2011 | Rex Dalton

Posted on 05/23/2011 5:43:19 PM PDT by Renfield

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: Renfield

I kept thinking ‘Like Sands Through an Hourglass, These are these days of our life’, way to much Drama for a seemingly Scientific document


21 posted on 05/23/2011 8:45:04 PM PDT by corbe (mystified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
All, see my smart-assed remarks above.

Why bother pinging me, if you're going to take over my duties before I get there?!? ;-')

22 posted on 05/23/2011 9:37:16 PM PDT by ApplegateRanch (Made in America, by proud American citizens, in 1946.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Renfield

Still a comet or some other major impact into the North
American ice sheet in the area near the Canadian Border might explain the fascinating Carolina Bays which all radiate from that area.


23 posted on 05/24/2011 3:42:34 AM PDT by finnsheep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renfield
This is the way it works (and the simple minded fall for it, and that's most of the population):

There are two ways to fool a person into thinking the impossible becomes possible:

1) Push the creation of life so far back in time that life from non-life becomes possible. With billions and billions of years surely two random molecules combined and started this whole thing.

2) Push the creation of life so far out in the universe that life from non-life becomes possible. The universe was seeded with life that began "out there" trillions of miles away. Sounds almost mystical until you realize that #1 above still must hold true.

An egg which came from no bird is no more 'natural' than a bird which had existed from all eternity.

- C. S. Lewis
24 posted on 05/24/2011 4:23:43 AM PDT by Scythian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnsheep

Indeed. There is a great deal of evidence for an impact that is either being ignored or downplayed for whatever reason.

It is hard to ignore the Carolina Bays. It is also important to note that if they are searching for impact evidence in Clovis, New Mexico then they are looking in the wrong place. Considering the “splash” pattern of ejecta, most of the evidence is along the eastern coastline. Normal jetstream patterns would push dust and other evidence into the Atlantic and onto Europe. Additionally, nanodiamond evidence was found in the Greenland ice sheet, east of the possible impact site.

Eh. Eliminate the impossible. Whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.


25 posted on 05/24/2011 7:51:39 AM PDT by BrewingFrog (I brew, therefore I am!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: All

Hi:

I’ve been somewhat following this theory here on FR for the last few years and find it compelling. Anyways I think someone in some previous FR thread listed a website called The Cosmic Tusk. The url is

http://cosmictusk.com/.

This website posts articles/reports/studies and such that are supportive of the cometary impact hypothesis. The miller-mccune article that is posted here was also posted on that website. Here is the url

http://cosmictusk.com/blast-from-past-yd-team-member-diciplined-by-goldeb-state-geo-board

It also has some comments at the end of it some of which are scathing criticisms of this article. You kind of have to wade through the comments a bit though.

Another interesting website that is linked to at the CosmicTusk is the following

http://craterhunter.wordpress.com

It has an article that I found to be really interesting called

“A Different Kind of Climate catastrophe”

Which can be found here

http://craterhunter.wordpress.com/a-different-kind-of-climate-catastrophe/

It presents an idea of how the cometary impact could have happened. The gist is that the comet broke up into a meteor stream and that the earth collided with it. The iceballs after they entered were converted to high temperature plasmas which scorched the ground like a blowtorch wiping out the North American Megafauna. This would explain the lack of an impact crater for the event. A very interesting read that I hope members will take a look at.

Anyways, I haven’t given up on the cometary impact hypothesis as the cause of the climate change of the Younger Dryas and the extinction of the megafauna.

As for myself i’m just a layman who has developed an interest in this type of stuff from the postings here on FR. To which I want to thank members who post this kind of stuff.


26 posted on 05/24/2011 10:14:11 AM PDT by CanadianPete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: enduserindy

“I’m waiting for “Clovisgate.”

Really tired of “thisgate” and “thatgate,” especially when Watergate was such a transparent fraud.

Why not go back a little further, just for variety, and dub it “Clovis-pot Dome?”


27 posted on 05/24/2011 1:50:09 PM PDT by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Let_It_Be_So
Amazing intellectual disconnect, aka cognitive dissonance.

Two different worlds! There's an enormous amount of evidence-gathering, research and non-ideological peer review to be done before any conclusions can be drawn about this.

28 posted on 05/24/2011 4:42:16 PM PDT by Bernard Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ApplegateRanch

:’)


29 posted on 05/24/2011 8:34:19 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Thanks Cincinna for this link -- http://www.friendsofitamar.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: CanadianPete

Thanks, will check it out tomorrow.


30 posted on 05/24/2011 8:36:16 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Thanks Cincinna for this link -- http://www.friendsofitamar.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv; Renfield
I was worried because we hadn't had the final, definitive refutation of this theory in over a month.

{{{SNORT}}} From Firestone et al's book, best I recall is they were trying, amongst other things probably, to explain the disappearance of a species or two around the time period they were studying. I thought the book was fairly compelling, although it got a tad technical in places. In any case, after a quick read of this article I didn't notice any theories this group of skeptics offered by way of explanation. And their best refutation appeared to consist primarily of sour grapes...

31 posted on 05/24/2011 9:19:14 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake (You have only two choices: SUBMIT or RESIST with everything you've got!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake

It appears to be another in a series of repetitive hatchet jobs. Kudos to the various media nimrods who regurgitate the phony critiques. :’)

The embedded particles, black mat, and sudden extinction (which included the short-lived Clovis culture) are real. The researchers didn’t make ‘em up, or pull ‘em out of their nether regions. :’)


32 posted on 05/25/2011 6:09:54 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Thanks Cincinna for this link -- http://www.friendsofitamar.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
nobody should take this kind of “scientific theory” seriously

Stop typing on your keyboard, switch off your computer, and never again use teh product of modern technology. All modern devices with electronic circuits depend upon the scientific theory of bandgaps with conduction holes and electrons to operate.

Lots and lots of scientific theories are well established and help us get through our daily lives. Some ar bunk because they do not stand up to careful scrutiny when all the evidence is examined. That this theory may have been overhyped nonsense does not invalidate all scientific theory.

33 posted on 05/27/2011 5:33:30 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Renfield
...insisting they are correct, even though no one can replicate their work: the hallmark of credibility in the scientific world.

Sounds like a typical evolutionist.

34 posted on 05/27/2011 5:37:13 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson