Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ooops! Biodegradeable products release methane which is more potent than CO2 as a greenhouse gas
wattsupwiththat.com ^ | May 31, 2011 | Anthony Watts

Posted on 06/03/2011 4:21:55 PM PDT by PROCON

Bad news for Greenware cups like the one below.

Study: Biodegradable Products May Be Bad For The Environment

Research from North Carolina State University shows that so-called biodegradable products are likely doing more harm than good in landfills, because they are releasing a powerful greenhouse gas as they break down.

“Biodegradable materials, such as disposable cups and utensils, are broken down in landfills by microorganisms that then produce methane,” says Dr. Morton Barlaz, co-author of a paper describing the research and professor and head of NC State’s Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering. “Methane can be a valuable energy source when captured, but is a potent greenhouse gas when released into the atmosphere.”

And the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) estimates that only about 35 percent of municipal solid waste goes to landfills that capture methane for energy use. EPA estimates that another 34 percent of landfills capture methane and burn it off on-site, while 31 percent allow the methane to escape.

“In other words,” Barlaz says, “biodegradable products are not necessarily more environmentally friendly when disposed in landfills.”

This problem may be exacerbated by the rate at which these man-made biodegradable materials break down. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) guidelines call for products marked as “biodegradable” to decompose within “a reasonably short period of time” after disposal. But such rapid degradation may actually be environmentally harmful, because federal regulations do not require landfills that collect methane to install gas collection systems for at least two years after the waste is buried. If materials break down and release methane quickly, much of that methane will likely be emitted before the collection technology is installed. This means less potential fuel for energy use, and more greenhouse gas emissions.

As a result, the researchers find that a slower rate of biodegradation is actually more environmentally friendly, because the bulk of the methane production will occur after the methane collection system is in place. Some specific biodegradable products such as bags that hold yard waste and are always sent to composting or anaerobic digestion facilities were not included in the study.

“If we want to maximize the environmental benefit of biodegradable products in landfills,” Barlaz says, “we need to both expand methane collection at landfills and design these products to degrade more slowly – in contrast to FTC guidance.”

The paper, “Is Biodegradability a Desirable Attribute for Discarded Solid Waste? Perspectives from a National Landfill Greenhouse Gas Inventory Model,” was co-authored by Barlaz and NC State Ph.D. student James Levis, and was published online May 27 by the journal Environmental Science & Technology. The research was supported by Procter & Gamble and the Environmental Research and Education Foundation.

-shipman-

The study abstract follows.

“Is Biodegradability a Desirable Attribute for Discarded Solid Waste? Perspectives from a National Landfill Greenhouse Gas Inventory Model”

Authors: James W. Levis, Morton A. Barlaz, North Carolina State University

Published: Online May 27, Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract: There is increasing interest in the use of biodegradable materials because they are believed to be “greener”. In a landfill, these materials degrade anaerobically to form methane and carbon dioxide. The fraction of the methane that is collected can be utilized as an energy source and the fraction of the biogenic carbon that does not decompose is stored in the landfill. A landfill life-cycle model was developed to represent the behavior of MSW components and new materials disposed in a landfill representative of the U.S. average with respect to gas collection and utilization over a range of environmental conditions (i.e., arid, moderate wet, and bioreactor). The behavior of materials that biodegrade at relatively fast (food waste), medium (biodegradable polymer) and slow (newsprint and office paper) rates was studied. Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyoctanoate) (PHBO) was selected as illustrative for an emerging biodegradable polymer. Global warming potentials (GWP) of 26, 720, -1000, 990, and 1300 kg CO2e wet Mg1_ were estimated for MSW, food waste, newsprint, office paper, and PHBO, respectively in a national average landfill. In a state-of-the-art landfill with gas collection and electricity generation, GWP’s of -250, 330, -1400, -96, and -420 kg CO2e wet Mg1 _ were estimated for MSW, food waste, newsprint, office paper and PHBO, respectively. Additional simulations showed that for a hypothetical material, a slower biodegradation rate and a lower extent of biodegradation improve the environmental performance of a material in a landfill representative of national average conditions.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: climatechange; globalwarming
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
“In other words,” Barlaz says, “biodegradable products are not necessarily more environmentally friendly when disposed in landfills.

Bu, bu, but Algore told me that green is good!/s

1 posted on 06/03/2011 4:22:01 PM PDT by PROCON
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: steelyourfaith; Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Ping-a-ling!


2 posted on 06/03/2011 4:22:56 PM PDT by PROCON (Liberals Mistake Education and Knowledge for Wisdom and Common Sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Unintended consequences.


3 posted on 06/03/2011 4:24:07 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Sarah Palin - She’s living rent-free inside the MSM’s heads. Credited to Lurk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Liberals always produce the opposite effect of their intent.


4 posted on 06/03/2011 4:24:07 PM PDT by bmwcyle (It is Satan's fault)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Bwahahahahahahahahahhhahahahahhahahahhahahahhahahahahahha


5 posted on 06/03/2011 4:25:15 PM PDT by texmexis best
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

The solution for very gassy landfills is to drill some wells, collect and condition the gas, and run it into a gas turbine genset. This is nothing new, in fact it is a common practice.


6 posted on 06/03/2011 4:33:29 PM PDT by Fred Hayek (FUBO, the No Talent Pop Star pResident.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Remarkably silly article.

The engineered-to-be-biodegradable products are a tiny proportion of the total biodegradable materials in every landfill.

Food waste, contents of disposable diapers, newspapers (a lot fewer of these than in the past), yard waste, paper of all types, etc., etc.

Whether the plastic bag around a mass of biodegradable materials is itself also biodegradable seems much ado about very little.


7 posted on 06/03/2011 4:34:01 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Methane, CH4, is the smallest hydrocarbon molecule, and is known to leak into the atmosphere in several places on the globe. Check up what “swampgas” is.

We have an abundance of CH4 (natural gas) in the ground and on the sea floor. Some of it, because of its small molecular size will seep out to the atmosphere — it plainly cannot be prevented.


8 posted on 06/03/2011 4:37:08 PM PDT by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; ...

Thanks PROCON. There’s probably a study that shows that the manufacture of Beano *causes* a net increase in methane.


9 posted on 06/03/2011 4:39:07 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Thanks Cincinna for this link -- http://www.friendsofitamar.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Thats unexpected.


10 posted on 06/03/2011 4:41:42 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fred Hayek
The solution for very gassy landfills is to drill some wells, collect and condition the gas, and run it into a gas turbine genset. This is nothing new, in fact it is a common practice.

Not far from my place is a hog packing plant with a huge
burn off torch for their waste lagoon. About 1/4 mile away
is a grain drying business with huge LP tanks to run the
dryers. Drives me nuts every time I see it!

11 posted on 06/03/2011 4:46:26 PM PDT by CrazyIvan (Obama's birth certificate was found stapled to Soros's receipt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

ping & lmao


12 posted on 06/03/2011 4:55:11 PM PDT by pandoraou812 (You can discover what your enemy fears most by observing the means he uses to frighten you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Do other biological processes on earth consume methane, or does it just stay out there in the atmosphere to work its mischief? Surely earth has had its share of methane swamps for ages.


13 posted on 06/03/2011 4:55:37 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Hawk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Let’s see:

“Biodegradeable” means to “break down” by “natural processes” in the soil - as opposed to remaining in tact,

which means to be “metabolized” by organisms in the soil,

which means to be “consumed”, “eaten” by organisms in the soil;

and, as it seems, farts are mostly methane and even refuse devouring organisms in the soil fart while they eat, and given as much as we feed them, they fart a lot.

Duh!!!!

Now who wasn’t smarter than a fifth grader?


14 posted on 06/03/2011 4:58:15 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

15 posted on 06/03/2011 4:59:58 PM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: pandoraou812

The landfills aren’t as gassy as the vegan enviro-wackos themselves. ;^)


16 posted on 06/03/2011 5:03:48 PM PDT by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/15/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
True. But I am checking everything now. If its able to dissolve easily when I need to put hot water in it, then I don't want it. My luck I would get burned...
17 posted on 06/03/2011 5:08:02 PM PDT by pandoraou812 (You can discover what your enemy fears most by observing the means he uses to frighten you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Nothing is “environmentally-friendly”, once its in a landfill !! They are, in essence, a stewpot of varigated chemicals, organics and metals being “cooked” by the heat of decomposition while discharging toxics in varying levels in the form of gasses or lechates. Smart operators grab the methane by-product.

On the “plus” side, our landfills are also repositories of valuable metals/chemicals “scrapped” in more prolifigate eras. They’re also a repository of valuable data on our life-styles, history and culture. >PS


18 posted on 06/03/2011 5:15:14 PM PDT by PiperShade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CrazyIvan

I have worked on one project with one generator manufacturer on a project for gensets using digestor gas from pig manure tanks. The gas is a combination of methane and carbon dioxide, so the engine timing (these were reciprocating spark engines) had to be worked on. The market is out there, and the fuel is already there to be burnt and utilized.


19 posted on 06/03/2011 5:26:17 PM PDT by Fred Hayek (FUBO, the No Talent Pop Star pResident.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Fred Hayek

I’ll resist the “Master-Blaster” jokes. I hear that storage
is a big problem with methane, also that it is very
corrosive. Is that true?


20 posted on 06/03/2011 5:51:14 PM PDT by CrazyIvan (Obama's birth certificate was found stapled to Soros's receipt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson