Skip to comments.Patti LaBelle Update: Beaten Cadet Sues Airport Worker Who Allegedly Squealed to West Point
Posted on 06/23/2011 12:12:00 PM PDT by RabidBartender
The former West Point cadet who's suing singer Patti LaBelle's entourage for allegedly assaulting him at Bush Intercontinental Airport last March has added an airport operations worker to the list of defendants.
In an amended complaint filed earlier this week, Richard King accuses Houston Airport System employee Cahl Rasmussen of relaying false and defamatory information to King's West Point supervisors -- namely, that King instigated the confrontation that left him bloody and landed him in the hospital.
"[Rasmussen] was not a witness, but without compunction, passed on the aforesaid false report as if it was true," the complaint states. "In an act far outside the scope of any job description, Rasmussen initially e-mailed, then spoke on the telephone, to King's supervisors at West Point."
The complaint does not state if Rasmussen saw the video of the incident before allegedly contacting West Point.
King's lawyers told Hair Balls earlier this month that, based on this information, West Point suspended King. The Houston Chronicle reported earlier that West Point officials said they conducted a "thorough investigation" of the incident and took "appropriate action" by suspending King. West Point officials have not responded to our request to confirm that Rasmussen spoke with King's supervisors, and Rasmussen has not responded to requests for comment.
Rasmussen has been an airport operations coordinator since 2004, according to his Facebook page. (Under his "employers" section, he wrote "Work as little as possible. Remember I work for the government!!" -- classic, Rasmussen).
He lists his previous occupation as a police officer for the city of Aurora, Colorado, from 1985-2000.
LaBelle and her entourage have not filed a response.
Well, obviously, BECAUSE!!!
You'll be waiting a LONG time. I would give a prick like you the time of day.
Sooo, my original gut reaction that you would not be able to provide this thread with specific citations was dead on, wasn't it? By your reaction, I seem to have struck a nerve.
If anything, I think you owe Cadet King an apology.
1. It wasn’t a habit. It was to impress on personnel that we are at war on home soil. We still are, although most people, both in the WH and on FR, don’t seem to get this fact.
2. We don’t wear BDUs, we wear ACUs. They are much uglier, more annoying and less effective than BDUs.
3. The beret is not gone. It is still a part of the ASU (Class A/B).
4. Wearing Class A/Bs everywhere means . . . you guessed it . . . the beret stays on.
The ASU shirt is white. Couldn’t we get tan or keep some green color? Why all white? Oh, and the ASUs cost me $600. My greens are fine, but we were forced to “upgrade.”
If public drunkenness were a dangerous charge, we would not have half our officer corps.
This looks like a railroad job all the way.
Yet the academy claims he was a good student in good standing.
Something does not add up. There is a hidden half to this iceberg.
It does the tape show the poor guy just pacing back ad forth talking on his phone and Patti LaBell pointng him out and the body guards attacking him after that. I;’d guess that the airport worker took their statments and took their side that he was up to something when he obiviously was just in the wrong place when someone unleashed their attack dogs just because they could.She oicked the wrong white guy to attack.
ahhh - brings back such fond memories !
Speaking of honor codes, ODH, where exactly DID you read that “the cadet was over the legal limit, which I have also read was confirmed by a BAC test when he received medical treatment at the hospital”?
Thanks for the update!
But this is just your speculation.
I also asked ODH to provide the bonafides of his claim. The limited google search didn’t turn up such a report of the cadet’s BAC being tested. And note that ODH added a incidental detail about the testing.
It isn’t my speculation that West Point said they expelled him for an honor code violation.
Often it isn’t the thing itself that gets you into trouble - it is the lying about it. That part is my speculation.
Right, what ODH did is a really dishonorable kind of slander. Even if he did actually read such a report it’s dishonorable to bring it up UNLESS he provides the citation.
If your gut is telling you not to trust him, I agree with you gut.
You were willing to slander the cadet. No way to contest your claim WITHOUT contesting your honor. Do you have any?
A serviceman may not have absolute confidentiality when the chain-of-command inquires into medical records. I’m guessing, but I think it’s pretty much a given.
Another thing that could get him in trouble is his commander treating other people's lies as truth and believing that the victim's true statement is a lie.
Often it is reasonable to believe a witness who has no dog in the fight, and doubly so when that witness was there because of his job duties. But in this particular case the witness appears to have an agenda. The lawsuit allows the victim's lawyer to get to the bottom of it.
If you search on his name you will see he makes 45K per year at the airport. I thought of that and then looked at the guy in the Tux at the "People's Choice" awards.
It may be him, but I have some doubts.
If the cadet was over the limit, it sounds like to me that he was probably standing too close her luggage, one of the body guards probably yelled at him to move over and then the kid got mouthy and Labelle told the guards to shut up the kid.
I just can’t see it being the kid was standing around minding his own business and the guards attacking him without provocation.
Did he really say that or did you pull that quote from the Onion?
Have you even watched the video?
The only video I have had a chance to see is the kid bobbing and weaving, trying to avoid the attack as he was surrounded, just prior to him getting pushed into the pillar.
The video doesn’t have audio, so whatever is being said, if anything, wouldn’t show up.
Even if the kid got a bit mouthy in some way, it would still be considered unprovoked, because he wasn’t posing as a threat to them.
Thanks T-Bird, for beating me to it on informing Hodar what is obvious from the tape which was posted on FR shortly after the incident.
It is pretty clear the individual was talking on a cell phone, not insulting anyone in the star’s entourage. And the tape also shows Airport Police posing for pics with the “star.” The same ones who are supposed to write up an incident report.
Hodar must have been fishing when this hit FR.
That’s OK. We’re here to help.
Can the Attorney General or his office get sued for making inflammatory statements like this?
Can the Attorney General personally insert him self into a lawsuit between two private parties?
Welcome to our planet, visitor from the stars.
LaBelle and her thugs enter the picture a few minutes later.....
They entered HIS space with the luggage, etc.
I can believe that and there isn’t any excuse for this.
It just seems that there is more to the story than her thugs attacking him, without any preceding events. There must have been some precedent event, whether it be that the cadet was mouthy when ordered to move or that, while on the cell phone, he did some body movement that indicated disdain to their order to move over or something.
No, he never said this...but I am certain this is what he was thinking knowing his past record of black on white crime occuring all over the country.
Thank you for the update ping! Very interested in this case. Good luck Cadet!
I don’t disagree - as I mentioned it’s a conduct offense, not an honor offense. There are a looottt of people who get conduct offenses. I wasn’t a big drinker, but that just allowed me to drive everyone elses cars while I was there.
Now if he lied about something that is one thing, but it sounds to me more along the lines that he wasn’t “politically in” and had no one to support him so WP immediately assumed the worst. And yes such a thing starts early at the academies - it’s akin to being in the jock/popular group in high school. Those that aren’t are Sh*t Screens the first year in hopes of driving them out - I was a screen myself the first year and laid low the rest of the time. Ended up in the middle of my class, but I knew if I messed up one time that would be it for me...while I watched others that had protection get away with all sorts of infractions. It’s a major reason I got out later as well.
Again if he lied about the incident during the investigation that’s one thing, but if it was just for conduct then I agree it was a railroad job.
Hey ODH, are you too busy doing research or really really important stuff to give a answer? By your honor, you should.
(1)I still hate the friggin' beret. IMHO, people wearing berets should be carrying unwrapped loaves of French bread.
(2)The white shirt is plain stupid.
(3)Apparently the same designer who was retained for Mexican Mariachi Mailman Uniforms is working the Pentagon.
(4) Given the CIC, I suppose I should be grateful that the troopers are not wearing flashing LEDs.
(5)Will Patti La Belle vote for the Magic Mohammedan Marxist MF in 2012? Enquiring minds want to know.
My personal suspicion is that security, in collusion with the LaBelle entourage, wanted the cadet to sign a statement that he was at fault, the cadet didn't want to, and so they decided to mess up the cadet's future in retaliation.
One thing I'm curious about is how the airport security guy knew the cadet was a cadet. Did he volunteer the information? Was he interrogated by security? Details are sketchy.
As a postscript, quite a few of my fatigue tour hours involved cleaning Crandall Pool in bathing suits along with one of the cheerleaders, so I wasn’t complaining too much.
My guess on that would’ve been by the ID he was carrying? The police probably got it and the security guy from them decided to take it upon himself to impress the Queen without thinking there is a video of it.I hope the cadet can have him removed from his job for what he did.
I was NROTC - Marine option.
Attacked in the mens room by two “football players” (pussies) from Annapolis while on cruise in Philipines.
1. These morons were stupid enough to want to fight in a heavily tiled room - there would be no winners, and
2. It is dumb to attack Marines - especially those with 6 years of wrestling training - (love to fight x 2 + fight every day?)
I fought the two goons off long enough for my buddies to hear - I think they were shocked when I fought back - as soon as it was even odds - the bullies were all for peace.
I never saw any evidence of any special honor code in any transaction with any Navy dude. I was “2 and screw” - not because of those morons, but corrected vision = no flight school.
And I’m sure I saw every midshipman on that cruise drunk off his ass. We were smuggling beer into the BOQ, and drinking after curfew, etc. I can remember half carrying guys back from town.
Doesn’t suprise me there were a lot of those types around - I tended to hang out with the prior enlisted types more they understood why we were really there. I will say though that even the Marine contingent that graduated with me had their fair share of idiots. That being said I also knew quite a few who I’d be proud to stand alongside. Any time you get a group that large there will always be idiots. What got me to thinking was if there were that many in a group of 4500, how many would there be in a college/university of 10,000- yikes!
Eric Holder is a disgrace to the USA!!
Bush's Intercontinental fault!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.