Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

OJ jurors relieved at no longer being the dumbest 12 people on earth
Wine and Excrement (Satire) ^ | July 5, 2011 | Sisyphus

Posted on 07/05/2011 9:31:40 PM PDT by orwell2112

OS ANGELES – Legal experts and scientists were quick to issue a verdict of their own following the shocking “not guilty” decision announced today in the Casey “Tot Mom” Anthony trial: the 12 jurors who were assigned to the OJ “The Juice” Simpson case are no longer the 12 dumbest people on the planet.

The Juice, a former NFL star running back and master knife wielder, was found not guilty in the “trial of the century” in 1995 despite a mountain of evidence to the contrary.

“But at least they had an excuse, an ulterior motive, for liberating The Juice,” explains Dr. Timothy Miser, a law professor, psychiatrist and talk-show host with the Buckhead Community College in Atlanta.

(Excerpt) Read more at wineandexcrement.com ...


TOPICS: Humor
KEYWORDS: caseyanthony; oj
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-159 next last
To: orwell2112
The evidence in the OJ case was overwhelming.

That jury still has the record for stupidity and bias.

In her closing arguments, Marcia Clark produced a chart showing nothing but facts not disputed by the defense. That alone should convicted Simpson.

101 posted on 07/06/2011 6:09:38 PM PDT by Churchillspirit (9/11/01...NEVER FORGET.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz
"I believe what many people do not understand (or refuse to understand) is that in a legal case (as opposed to public opinion or 'common sense') there is a legal burden of proof that needs to be met."

Well, no. You're wrong. People do understand that. There's no way they couldn't get that after having it explained repeatedly by all the lawyers and talking heads ever talking about this and any other trial. People get this.

No, the problem here is that the jury was too stupid to recongize it when the burden had been met because the evidence didn't look like what they see on CSI.

102 posted on 07/06/2011 6:16:30 PM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: mlo

Here’s what we know:

According to the defense, 2-year-old Caylee drowned, and the Dad covered it all up after sexually molesting Casey. Then mom did internet searches for chloroform. Then she didn’t.

No one knows who used Casey’s computer to do the internet searches for “neck injuries, chloroform, inhalation, death, head injuries,” and “internal bleeding.” Or who deleted them.

Then Casey worked at Universal Studios for two years. Then she didn’t.

Then according to Casey, she left Caylee with a Nanny named...uh...Zanny. That’s when the trouble began. Zanny kept Caylee for 31 days, while the family kept asking where Caylee was. Then she didn’t. Because there WAS no Nanny named Zanny.

My theory is that Caylee put duct tape over her own mouth, walked into the woods, climbed into the trash bag, and suffocated.

Casey was so distraught by her father raping her that she didn’t even notice Caylee was missing. And she tried to forget about Rapist Dad by partying and getting tattoos and making up more lies about Zanny the Nanny. Also, in not reporting anything to the police for a month.

But the main thing is, this is a “HUGE VICTORY FOR JUSTICE”® and we can all celebrate the jury’s verdict!

WOOOOOHOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!

Pass the fireworks and champagne.

/


103 posted on 07/06/2011 6:43:37 PM PDT by Do Not Make Fun Of His Ears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Do Not Make Fun Of His Ears

/s


104 posted on 07/06/2011 6:43:55 PM PDT by Do Not Make Fun Of His Ears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
I am so glad to have seen your post.

RE: this alternate JUROR stating THEY thought it was accident or not proving GUILT.

HOW did he know that, IF and unless he/they all talked after being admonished by the great JUDGE PERRY, everytime he dismissed them.

They got some Splaining to do.

I also heard tonight that JUROR #3 said none of them thought she was innocent. WHAT the hell is going on here.

Can't they read? and are they all DEAF as well a being DUMB, when they don't head the Judge's admonishments of not discussing the case.

The Jury instructions as to the Charges were Read over and over and over. If they still did not understand, help was just a click or a tap on the door away.

There was more Circumstantial Evidence in this Case than there was in the Scott Peterson or the Melanie McGuire case and they are now both in PRISON, as Casey should be.

McGuire remember is the woman who drugged and the chopped up her husband, stuffed the remains in 2 suitcases and threw them in the river. All circumstantial.

This Jury simply was to lazy it appears to have listened to anything, or it was a Runaway Jury. If what I heard about what Juror #3 now says, something went very wrong here and is SUSPECT. YET, each confirmed their verdict in open court when polled by the Judge.

The Prosecution in this case was masterful and cut to the quick. They were simply ignored, or they proved their case and JURY checked the wrong BOX, by "ACCIDENT Snowballing out of Control."

105 posted on 07/06/2011 11:27:02 PM PDT by annieokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Do Not Make Fun Of His Ears
Oh, I do like your post. I have been sarcasticly saying these very same words.

Another version to add yours as a summation would be:

Caylee committed Sucide and tried to pin it on her mother. She was just so sick and tired of being in the way of her mothers fun. /SARC,big time.

As far as the tape. Casey put it there so she would not have to look at her daughters face, while she stuffed her in those bags.

106 posted on 07/06/2011 11:42:50 PM PDT by annieokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: annieokie

“RE: this alternate JUROR stating THEY thought it was accident or not proving GUILT.

HOW did he know that, IF and unless he/they all talked after being admonished by the great JUDGE PERRY, everytime he dismissed them.

They got some Splaining to do.

I also heard tonight that JUROR #3 said none of them thought she was innocent. WHAT the hell is going on here.”


EXCELLENT points. Also with some ‘splainin to do...my heroes Rush and Mark Levin, who both said there was NO EVIDENCE Casey killed her baby.

Wha——?????


107 posted on 07/06/2011 11:50:18 PM PDT by Do Not Make Fun Of His Ears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: annieokie

Hannity too. But Hannity is a joke-—NOT my hero.


108 posted on 07/06/2011 11:51:04 PM PDT by Do Not Make Fun Of His Ears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

The DA screwed up they had no facts of any kind only a lot of what if questiond.I think her parents had something to do with it or know something about it.


109 posted on 07/07/2011 3:22:14 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: outpostinmass2

Cases are based on facts not guess work the DA did a sloppy job.


110 posted on 07/07/2011 3:23:34 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

mom, the KILLER
How do you know that?what fact point to that answer?.


111 posted on 07/07/2011 3:25:44 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: navysealdad

Guilty by guess work is the work of a dangerous idiot,what next a mob rushes the jail and hangs her?.
Facts prove guilt the DA FAILD to prove anything.She may have done it but they need proof.


112 posted on 07/07/2011 3:29:55 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Facts something that case didn’t have not one.


113 posted on 07/07/2011 3:31:03 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: orwell2112; Liz; sickoflibs

ping


114 posted on 07/07/2011 3:37:32 AM PDT by GOPJ (Black flash mobs: street level reflections of elite liberal hatred for middle class America..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaduz
Facts something that case didn’t have not one.

I guess you didn't watch the trial. You sound stupid, I would shut up.

115 posted on 07/07/2011 4:29:19 AM PDT by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: doc1019; orwell2112; GOPJ; Condor51; sickoflibs; stephenjohnbanker; freekitty; Louis Foxwell; ...

As for dummy jurors, you have to count in the Galveston jury that found NY real estate heir Robert Durst innocent of killing..... and savagely dismembering.......his neighbor. Morris Black’s limbs and torso were found in garbage bags floating in Galveston Bay.

Durst landed in Galveston b/c he was also a suspect in his wife’s unsolved murder back in NY, and in a third unsolved murder of his friend in California.

In Galveston Durst bizarrely posed as a deaf mute woman and had even jumped bail. The multi-millionaire was later seen on security video shop-lifting a sandwich at a supermarket....and had $35,000 cash in his car.

Galveston jurors stupidly bought the high-paid defense’s arguments that Durst killed Black in self-defense......(yeah, that would explain why Durst savagely dismembered the body /snix.)

In an amazing indictment of the justice system, the jurors were not told of Durst’s earlier killings....and later said, had they known, they would have decided differently.

Durst lived happily ever after-—his rich family bought out his share in the Durst real estate empire for about $50 million (the family was scared stiff of this deranged murderer and wanted to get rid of him).


116 posted on 07/07/2011 4:41:08 AM PDT by Liz ( A taxpayer voting for Obama is like a chicken voting for Col Sanders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Liz
I remember that. And those jurors must have all been on STOO-PID Pills.

As to OJ, those jurors just hated the Cops and 'whitey'. They were getting even with 'the man', end of story. And it wasn't 'the Glove'. I saw that I knew he was intentionally stretching his hand, as I do that with gloves I don't want any more. Plus anyone with a pulse knows leather gloves shrink after they get wet, with water or blood. Getting them back on takes some 'working'. Leather Golf Gloves do that after every round.

But with this case I don't know I didn't follow it. The only thing I do remember was her mom or dad saying that in her car trunk that it had "The Smell Of Death". And once you smell it you know what it is and always will (I know). But was that enough to convict? I don't know about the other evidence they had to convict her of murder? (Murder being the operative word)

117 posted on 07/07/2011 5:11:24 AM PDT by Condor51 (The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits [A.Einstein])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Condor51
...............I don't know about the other evidence they had to convict her of murder....

She told lie after lie even saying she had left Caylee w/ a nanny---trying to pin the murder on the nanny (that woman is now suing her).

Innocent people don't have to lie.

But I think the biggest evidence of guilt was that she waited 31 days to notify anybody about Caylee being missing. After all that time, Caylee had to be dead----how could a small child fend for herself?

Mothers don't act like that---if a small child is missing, they call 911 immediately....and shout it from the rooftops to get help from anyone who will listen.

I think the jurors were swayed by videos the defense showed----Caylee and Casey having fun together. That put the all-important "doubt" in the juror's mind that a mother could kill her own child.

118 posted on 07/07/2011 5:24:03 AM PDT by Liz ( A taxpayer voting for Obama is like a chicken voting for Col Sanders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Vaduz
..........the DA did a sloppy job............

Could agree with that-----the prosecution made it a death penalty case. Had the prosecution made it a simple homicide case, they might have gotten a conviction. The jury was understandably reticent to send someone to their death without compelling evidence.

The defense created doubt about the mother's actual connection to Caylee's death.....there was no cause of death, DNA, etc......

They did have a mountain of Casey's lies....which pointed to guilt.

119 posted on 07/07/2011 5:35:56 AM PDT by Liz ( A taxpayer voting for Obama is like a chicken voting for Col Sanders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Vaduz

Yep. Most people have a dead body in their trunk.


120 posted on 07/07/2011 5:40:05 AM PDT by navysealdad (http://drdavehouseoffun.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-159 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson