Posted on 07/23/2011 8:47:00 PM PDT by Bigtigermike
Anders Behring Breivik accused of gunning down 85 people at a youth camp and killing another seven in a bomb attack regularly poster on several Norwegian Internet sites, notably the blog document.no, which is run by Hans Rustad, a former left wing journalist. Breivik's whole shtick seems to be against the combination of multiculturalism and Islam which he sees as destructive to the Norway culture and Europe as a whole. While Breivik is anti-Muslim immigration from his postings and manifesto, he appears to be at least not against Muslim people as a whole but against 'political Islam'....He appears to be all over the map politically and ideology
Here is the original document.no postings of Breivik
Here is the English translations
Some posts out of over a 1000:
Posted on 2009-09-14 10:57:20 as a reaction to post by 'Caper'
Caper,
I didn't see that the EDL as it is today is what we would have wanted. But it is essential that the intellectual conservative forces (unofficially) offer political and ideological schooling to our youth between 15 and 25. Who else is to do that?
We cannot despise the young in society and refuse to come closer to them only because they lack ideological training, since it is exactly OUR (culturally conservative intellectuals) responsibility to do so.
Bawer [homosexual anti-islamist Bruce Bawer] is probably not the right person to work as a bridge builder. He is a liberal anti-Jihadist, and in many ways not a culturally conservative. I have my suspicions about him being TOO paranoid [with reference to his homosexuality). It could seem as though he fears that 'cultural conservatives' will become a threat against homosexuals in the future. Therefore he refuses to take his chance to influence them into a positive direction? That seems completely irrational.
It has to be said that many organizations such as VB [Flemish nationalist party Vlaams Belang] needs to go through many 'reforms', before they reach our level.
Anyway, we are not in a position where we can pick and choose our partners. That's why we have to ensure that we influence other culturally conservatives to take our anti-racist pro-homosexual, pro-Israeli line of thought. When this direction has been taken we can take it to the next level.
The consolidation MUST continue, and people must contribute by influencing (in stead of isolating).
------------------------------------------------
post 68
For me it is very hypocritical to treat Muslims, Nazis and Marxists differ. They are all supporters of hate-ideologies. Not all Muslims, Nazis and Marxists are conservative, most are moderate. But does it matter? A moderate Nazi might, after having experienced fraud, choose to be conservative. A moderate Muslim can, after being refused to enter a club, be conservative, etc.
------------------------------------------------
Post 85
I completely agree that Obama is a brilliant retoriker and communicator, one of the best we've seen over the past 30 years
-----------------------------------------------------
Post 87
But firstly, we can not and should not compare the cultural struggle in the U.S. with that in Europe. Rhetoric must and should be different. The average "right click" - Republican in the U.S. is a "libertarian" (anti-socialist but pro multikulti) while the average conservative in Europe is much more anti-multikulti but arguments based on cultural resistance against Islamization.
Post 89
The so-called anti-multiculti in the U.S. based their rhetoric on ethnocentrism alone which thus differs greatly from Europeans. This is the main reason that we must separate the American and European cultural struggle. I usually stay away from American issues as a result.
---------------------------------------------------
Post 307
I strongly doubt that your theory is correct. The whole conflict between GDP and EDL started with a change of leadership in the EDL for a few months ago. They threw out the racist and denounced the BNP. They chose instead SIOE's ideological basis that is more or less mainstream view on the right side in Western Europe now (Vienna School of Thought).
------------------------------------------------
post 335
Ethnocentric movements that BNP, National Front is not successful and will never be able to get over 10% support (GDP 5%, the UN has 7%). One can not fight racism (multikulti) with racism. Ethnocentrism is therefore the complete opposite of what we want to achieve.
-------------------------------------------------
post 443
Young people need solutions, and currently there are no anti-racist youth culture conservative options. Some people choose the options that exist, that it is ethnocentric.
------------------------------------------------
Post 775
Most people here have nothing against Muslims in general, Muslims do not follow the Quran that is. It is the political doctrine of Islam is the problem.
Post 777
The problem is that key Islamic concepts such as al-taqiyya and naskh (Quranic abrogation) makes it more or less impossible to distinguish "moderate Muslims" (individuals who do not follow the Quran) from orthodox Muslims.
--------------------------------------------------------
Post 233
I have never understood why the West focus so disproportionately on Iran and so little on the Wahhabi Saudi leadership, which after all is the most dangerous and most powerful Muslim central power. We should, of course, as soon as the bombing suspect their facilities but otherwise focus much more on Saudi. Could it be something that Iran is not a major oil exporter?
I heard that Sarah Palin made him do it. [/s]
He mentions being a “multiculturalist” in the manifesto. Culture is not politics.
Obama is a brillant retoriker and communicator......As long as he has a teleprompter.
Why is he regarded as a right-winger?
Because the liberals want to blame EVERYTHING on right wingers, so they can say ‘see. only right wing white men are terrorists’.
The guy knows his history. Sums up the crusade as a defensive strategy against the Islamic takeovers, etc.
WOW so not only did Sarah Palin make him do it, but he likes Obama too..silly rabbit, he must have gotten confused when Sarah said NOT to like Obama, he took it as “like” instead
In case this is of interest.
Let us not dignify this person in any way.
Let us not consider his views or debate his attitudes.
I don’t really care what he thought about anything.
Whatever his thoughts, he thought it was OK to murder innocent people, so screw him, his philosophy doesn’t matter, we are only interested in it if it can show motive for his crimes.
I thought is was “Buuuuuuuuush!” Silly me. /s
Couldn’t have said it better myself.
Thanks for posting.
When the commie, progressive scum say he's a Christian Conservative, we need to be ready to dispute their claim. We can only do that if we have knowledge with which to frame an argument.
You might enjoy wallowing in the mire of ignorance, but don't try to drag the rest of us in to the mud with you.
When the commie, progressive scum say he's a Christian Conservative, we need to be ready to dispute their claim. We can only do that if we have knowledge with which to frame an argument.
You might enjoy wallowing in the mire of ignorance, but don't try to drag the rest of us in to the mud with you.
Please! no one is ‘dignifying’ him....He’s a lot like Loughner who is not a cookie cutter person made by the media, he’s a killer of 90+ people and that he’s more complicate than initial reports, that’s what we are saying!
Also in his compendium, early in, he states that none of HIS resistance group were to join any “hate” groups like anti-Jewish nazis. Further in, he declares that ALL European men, women, and children MUST be Baptized.
He thinks and writes in minutiae, but without consistency or logic.
You know “Right Wingers”??? They generally want to preserve there own rights by killing children....NOT! For the MSM, if you are not a socialist, you’re a right winger.
bump for later
In Norway, the terms ‘rightist’ and ‘leftist’ or ‘right’ and ‘left’ , do not have the same meaning they do here in the US.
The media is purposefully NOT explaining this, because they know what Americans will ASSUME in the use of the term ‘rightist’.
There is a recent thread on this subject which explains what the terms mean over there. Apparently, the terms aren’t even correct, but the label stuck.
If I can find the thread, I’ll link it to you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.