Skip to comments.If Jerry Sandusky had raped little GIRLS...
Posted on 11/11/2011 4:17:13 PM PST by Lancey Howard
...he would soon be heading into his second decade in prison.
But Jerry Sandusky did NOT bring little girls home to the Sandusky household or taken a little girl as his guest to the Outback Bowl. That would have raised eyebrows. No. Sandusky always seemed to have little boys around, so that was okay. That was safe, everybody told themselves. And what could they say about it anyway?
Had the 1998 witness seen Sandusky fondling or raping a 10-year-old girl rather than a little boy, and had the burly 28-year-old former PSU quarterback Mike McQueary witnessed Sandusky raping a 10-year-old girl, there would have been no running to Daddy or waiting until the next day to tell somebody about it. There would have been no hesitation about what to do. There would have been no reluctance to point the finger and condemn Sandusky as a pedophile.
At the very core of Penn State's ruinous scandal, homosexuality is the elephant in the room - - homosexuality and the political correctness that comes with it. Regular old pedophilia is easy to get publicly outraged about. Even the suspicion of regular old pedophilia elicits menacing sneers at the accused.
But little boys? Well, that's different. That's a homosexual thing, and well, you just have to be... careful. Especially on a college campus where the homosexual "community" rules the day. (Shrug. Gotta be "tolerant" don't you know... enlightened and all that stuff. ..because I'm a good, live-and-let-live person. Que sera sera. Who am I to judge? Etc.)
Homosexuality. Yes, George and Jerry, there's something wrong with that.
When Graham Spanier took over the reins as Penn State's president in 1995 he vowed to make the campus the most LGBT-friendly campus in the nation. Since the arrival of Grahm Spanier as university president, Penn State has sponsored 'the Tent of Consent' all about gay sex - - as well as C*ntfest. (Remember that?)
Somebody please ping me if they happen to spot a Sandusky story out of the Democrat "mainstream" newsrooms that uses the phrase "predatory homosexual pedophile", or even just the word "homosexual"! Even now, the Democrat "mainstream" newsrooms are dancing around the obvious, ignoring the elephant in the room.
Here’s Irony for ya:
Penn State Marching Band - Michael Jackson Tribute
FR Catholics on this forum will tell you he was a Hebephile or Ephebophile because it sounds nicer than Pedophile.
At the end of the day, it’s all child rape and those commit these evil acts against children should be executed with extreme malice ala Dahmer.
This is worse:
Penn State Rock n Roll - Gary Glitter
and all it takes for child rapists to triumph is for good men to bump it upstairs, tell their daddy, or do nothing to stop it.
Well, one difference, Glitter was into girls, which actually shocked me when I found out.
As has been said here before, if only they allowed coaches to marry.
It’s about systemic organizational evil not theology.
Glitter was convicted for downloading tons of child pornography in Britain in 1999 and later convicted for committing obscene acts with minors in Vietnam. But yes, it was all little girls.
I'm not so sure, he is a despicable, lowlife, coward and I don't believe he would have the guts to do anything even if a child was being murdered. More than likely he's also a fagot and didn't think it was any big deal.
Disgusting, all of them!
No, heres Irony for ya:
Oh, come on! Was it necessary to slam Catholics here? This Catholic, among others, strongly condemned the church over the cover-up and still struggles with Cardinal Law continuing with the Church. It’s not easy for any of us to forgive, certainly, it’s not easy for me to forgive Law and Mahoney and all those other perverts. And I’m not the only one.
I'm an FR Catholic and I'll tell you he was a pedophile because that's what he is.
Which makes you a liar.
No slam, just identifying the parallels. Some struggle you got there...
I wouldn’t stay affiliated with any organization that continued to protect child rapists.
At least the Penn State perverts have a chance of being brought to justice since they can’t flee to Rome.
Thank you, I was beginning to feel alone. I expressed similar sentiments in another forum and got back some snarky remark.
We really are being collectively brainwashed as a culture to the point you call this fellow "gay" and someone will say, "no, he's a pedophile."
This phenomenon is simply not accidental.
I say “pedophylic Queer”
“Its about systemic organizational evil not theology.”
Systematic organizational evil - what an apt description of anti-Catholics here at FR.
To ignore the fact these particular pedophiles are gay is to miss the revolutionary change that is taking place around us.
And, no, I'm not saying this has never happened before in history; in fact, it's happened frequently and always ends badly.
Far to many threads FRiend to to contrary...
Priests, Abuse, and the Meltdown of a Culture. The lessons of an important new study.
Shock after Dutch priest endorses pedophilia
Ok, enough already. Happy to see your name in print? Geeze.
For your edification the Catholic Church has paid out hundreds of millions of dollars as reparations for alleged atrocities committed long after the Statute of Limitations had passed. That’s a good thing done by the communion of persons showing great understanding of sin and forgiveness. I have never met any Catholic person who excused in any way the conduct of this or any other pedophile. That is the Catholic Church to which we belong.
Penn State condoned the raping of children.
The gender of the victims has no bearing on the severity of the crimes.
It's a very weird fixation you have.
I don't agree with everything Lutherans or Buddhists are up to, but I don't spend all my time on this forum pointing out what I perceive to be their failings.
You seem to have a very small mind, since you filled it up so easily.
I have no problem calling a pedophile a pedophile, regardless of whether they wear a collar or not. Was there an institutional problem? Of course, and to deny as much would be every bit as dishonest as saying every member of that institution defended the cover-up(s).
It would be no different than saying that Mike Nifong abused his authority and the enforcement of rape statutes, therefore all prosecutors and laws against rape are evil. You paint with a broad brush. Evil should be called out for what it is, and when it's manifested itself in revered institutions, be they the Church, the military, a university football program, etc. it needs to be purged. It does not mean that every member of those respective institutions is guilty or complicit in that evil; in fact, it is frequently the members of the institution who have the highest stakes in putting things aright.
Yes, the frantic efforts to block out the homo aspect would be hilarious if not so sick.
Nobody said anything about "the severity of the crimes". The point is that the political correctness forced on normal people by the liberal homosexual media complex allowed the raping of children to continue for about a decade longer than it should have.
I can’t really agree with that. These guys are slick and get by with it every day with both sexes. Whenever one of these comes to light, it’s always that it went on too long and there were people who should have known
Had the 1998 witness seen Sandusky fondling or raping a 10-year-old girl rather than a little boy, and had the burly 28-year-old former PSU quarterback Mike McQueary witnessed Sandusky raping a 10-year-old girl, there would have been no running to Daddy or waiting until the next day to tell somebody about it.
Heard a radio show the other morning running an online poll on what would you do? For an anonymous child more than 50% said they’d walk out. When the question was changed to your child it became better than 50% would take immediate action. Go figure.
If it’s me (and I’m not a large person) someone is getting their ass whipped. Might be me, but he’s stopping what he’s in the process of doing and the cops are on the way
As has been said here before, if only they allowed coaches to marry.
If it were me and I walked in on it, I’d either be dead or in prison.
You nailed it
BINGO little boy or little girl doesn’t matter is just a horrid. and painful
What’s been reported is the kids were below the age of puberty that makes it pedophila. If they are at puberty or above than you have a gay man praying on male children. Most of the Catholic Church sex scandals fall into this lattter class. The media likes to hide this so they call it child abuse and hide the age of the child and what’s the difference. Stright men are more likely to be involved in pedophilia (many more stright men than gay men in general population). This allows the other issues to be deflected with charges of homophobia. In this case they have mentioned the childrens ages and it looks like pedophila.
Exactly. If you follow this story thru 'mainstream' forums like ESPN and other related news sites; you will be hard-pressed to find the word 'homosexual'. You can't tell me that out of the thousands upon thousands of comments being made at ESPN; not ONE poster has mentioned 'homosexual'??? They are being removed deliberately...political correctness is strangling America.
That’s what I can’t understand. How is Sandusky still alive? With so many kids involved you would think somebody would have gotten to the guy by now. If he had done that to my boy, and I had somehow managed to hold myself back waiting for authorities to act, and then nothing happened to the guy....
What a world.
Are ANY churches preaching against the sin of homosexuality any more?
The Catholic Church is not simply an “organization”. It is the deeply held faith we were raised in. Yes, grievous mistakes were made, but I will not be dumping my faith because of some human failings.
Thats what I cant understand. How is Sandusky still alive?
He was preying on troubled kids from single parent families. No daddy or any other strong male to take up for them. What McQuery (what a name) didn’t do was dispicible
Excellent judgement, LH.
“You can’t tell me that out of the thousands upon thousands of comments being made at ESPN; not ONE poster has mentioned ‘homosexual’??? They are being removed deliberately...political correctness is strangling”
Do news stories regarding the rape of a woman by a man or the molestation of a girl by a man mention the word heterosexual?
If not, why not?
>> The gender of the victims has no bearing on the severity of the crimes.
No question, but the argument is about the marginalization of rape perpetrated against male children. This kind of rape is deceitfully mistreated as an unwelcome excess of homosexuality, instead of being treated as the vicious crime it truly is; a crime that is properly adjudicated when it involves female children. It’s a reasonable argument to make if one suspects the homosexual agenda involves the conditioning of children.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.