Skip to comments.Woman arrested after being 'caught having sex with 15-year-old boy on Thanksgiving Day'
Posted on 12/04/2011 4:09:05 PM PST by buccaneer81
A Texas woman was arrested after relatives said they caught her having sex with a 15-year-old boy on Thanksgiving Day. The scene unfolded at a family gathering held on the holiday at a house in Oakridge Forest Lane in Spring.
Police arrested Amanda Billiris, 23, after relatives said they witnessed her having sexual intercourse with the boy, the arrest report states.
The avid motorcycle racer has been charged with sexual assault of a child, a second-degree felony, reports the Houston Courier.
According to the Texas Penal Code, if convicted, she faces between two to 20 years in prison. Ms Billaris may also be fined up to $10,000 if she is found guilty of the offence.
Billaris has been released on bond from the Montgomery County Jail. According to her own statements on the message boards at Motohouston.com, Mr Billiris, suffered serious injuries in a 2009 motorcycle crash when she was returning from a RideSmart event at Texas World Speedway which left her in a critical condition. She said she received a severe blow to the head and kidney injuries.
Ms Billiris, who once owned a white and pink honda, would regularly make posts on Motohouston.com, which is a discussion forum for Houston's local motorcycle riders. On her Facebook page, she lists her college major as 'Communication Studies - Interpersonal'.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Shh... FR is very PC on this topic. We like to pretend otherwise.
Noobie!!! I knew it
I figured you were done with me by the way you refuse to engage in debate. Its all over but the rage filled log off, folks.
You won’t even answer one question to help me better understand your position?
I’ll make it even simpler for you.
Is child rape...rape rape, or just child rape?
Depending on the specific Sexual Act she was performing, that could be a problem.
Oh, perfect lady, it gets better. If you are only at #86 keep reading! LOL
I’m real new.
But I’m an old enough hand here to know that the extent of your contributions are “laz would hit it” and “not guilties.”
How old are you? Mind telling us? Why does a satyr come to mind?
Are you also of the opinion that it is “ridiculous” to arrest an adult woman for sex with a minor?
Because that is how he feels. He’s pro woman-boy love, anti man-girl love. He admits it is a double standard, but hey, you gotta have standards.
In his mind arresting this woman is just “ridiculous.”
I personally find both kinds of child rape repugnant. I don’t differentiate between them. I blame the adult, male or female, in all cases.
now we have ‘aunts with benefits’ - disgusting behavior.
Oh, I read it. But I’ve noticed this guy before. He’s very combative and likes to get in people’s faces, so to speak. There are a handful of Freepers I just don’t bother with because I can tell their only real goal is to fight with someone.
Some are Newbies. Some are punks. Some are both.
Brad Wesley, the town bully
“Oh, I read it. But Ive noticed this guy before. Hes very combative and likes to get in peoples faces, so to speak. There are a handful of Freepers I just dont bother with because I can tell their only real goal is to fight with someone.”
You are correct.
I think it’s a disruptor.
Notice how it keeps trying to twist what I say to make it sound like the opposite? Trying to goad me into a fight where there is none?
I don’t worry about such trolls.
Eventually the Viking Kitties will eat it.
Her mother wasn't born yet when I was 15.
Perhaps his aunt said no
“Perhaps his aunt said no”
Stay classy. That thought is the product of a diseased mind. Kind of what I’d expect from a frustrated old man whose only release is sexual innuendo on the internet.
Obviously you’re no 15 year old boy, sir. I can tell because you are the victim here.
You should be free to call someone a dick in response to reasonable debate. Then, curl up like a spider and scream for help.
Viking Kitties will find it hard to eat something when they only show their hind end to it. You gotta face up to something to get your teeth on it.
I didn’t used to keep track of who I was arguing with on FR, but eventually I started noticing certain types haunt certain threads, and their only goal is to pounce on anyone who doesn’t agree with them. They usually have one area that they’re kind of obsessed with (education, abortion, atheism) and they run all over the thread with this swaggering, chest-thumping attitude. They usually have a very distinctive posting style too. You can tell it’s them by the format before you even look at the bottom of the post.
You figured all this out in the month I’ve been here?
I killed Jimmy Hoffa too. I also created New Coke.
It is too bad that you’re so caught up in this that you choose to take the side of someone who thinks that a woman having sex with a minor is ok.
That is his position. By siding with him it makes it yours.
You are right about that. We all have a “posting style” that becomes almost like a signature and after awhile you can recognize a lot of posters almost as if you were hearing their distinctive “voice”.
As far as the trolls go, it drives them nuts to ignore them but once I recognize one that is exactly what I do.
“and they run all over the thread with this swaggering, chest-thumping attitude”
Oh..and by the way...here’s some of my swaggering, chest-thumping quotes.
“Trolling around looking for a pissing match is not what this place is about.
I wont take crap off a newb.
Go find someone else to play with, kid.”
Wait a minute...that wasn’t me. I’ve said nothing of the sort. That was your partner, Nik.
Chest thumping indeed.
Yes, I’ve been driven to insanity by you taking to your heels.
My wife doesn’t like to come right out and say things directly either. So maybe you are annoying me...
Please, stop driving me insane. You can stop the torment by just answering my very reasonable questions.
Or you can get mad...offer personal insults...then call in backup. That won’t make me mad at all, in fact I might enjoy seeing you in full flight.
As far as the actual topic of the thread, I hope the legal system weighs everything carefully. You're right when you say these numbers are arbitrary. If she'd been 17, it wouldn't be a crime, but presumably if she was 18, suddenly she's an adult and it's "rape." (Insulting to compare this to a violent assault, but some people enjoy using such words.)
I like how you pretend this wasn’t the incestual rape of a child by a grown woman.
What would the real personality be of a person who when offered reasonable debate devolves into personal insults which have to removed by the Admin?
Because only one party has done that here.
It is a shame about the law, though. A 23 year old aunt should be as free to rape her underage nephew as a 17 year old aunt. That is your point, correct?
“but presumably if she was 18, suddenly she’s an adult and it’s “rape.” (Insulting to compare this to a violent assault, but some people enjoy using such words.)”
That is another reason why I am so strongly opposed to so many of these situations being referred to as “rape”. It is demeaning to those who have really been victims of rape which is truly a horrible crime.
The boy in this case is old enough to know better. He was just as wrong as she was and yet he gets “victim” status and she gets a sex offender record. They were BOTH behaving badly. There was no victim here that I can see.
If a 15 year old convinces an adult to rob a bank...who is legally the (more) responsible party?
The kid is a bank robber only a few years removed from playing with GI Joes.
The adult is a weak minded fool who let a child manipulate him.
It doesn’t make the kid any less guilty...but it certainly makes the adult the worse of the two parties.
Yes. If you’ve ever seen a thread where a 15 year old boy has raped a 9 year old girl, you’ll suddenly see an about-face in terms of Freeper’s perception of his adulthood. Suddenly, 15 is old enough for hanging.
15 is old enough for hanging. Always has been. See, the older, presumably more mature person bears the majority of the responsibility. It even works in made up scenarios.
Here’s the real question though.
Would we see an about-face in terms of your defense of child rape if it was a 15 year old girl and a 9 year old boy?
Judging from the responses of the Nak mutual admiration society, I’d have to say yes.
Oh yes. And you know what?
Actually, I would agree to the point short of hanging. But that would be consistent with my asserting that 15 year old is old enough to be responsible for his behavior, now wouldn’t it?
Why not 9?
Isn’t it just a number? Wasn’t that your position earlier?
You aren’t suddenly creating...standards, are you?
Yep. I’m more creeped out by her being his aunt. It’s odd that the incest factor isn’t getting as much attention as the age difference.
By the way...the fact that you don’t believe a 15 year old rapist of a 9 year old should be hung is pretty consistent with the position you’ve been putting forward here.
I say hang ‘em high.
Not as odd as your reading comprehension skills.
I’ve mentioned the incestual angle in nearly every post of mine. I’ve pointedly asked you about the incest angle. You pretended you didn’t read. When you were in high school, did you ever talk just loud enough while trashing some girl that other people could hear? You know, you want to tear her down...but you don’t want to actually confront her. She might bring up some of your own shortcomings, after all.
Interesting that you just admitted that you didn’t bother to read anything before rushing to the defense of child rape enablers.
In this instance, the boy is her brother’s son.
“Its odd that the incest factor isnt getting as much attention as the age difference.”
Somehow I also missed that the first time I read it. I didn’t notice until after I posted my first reply.
I don’t know what the incest laws are were this occurred. Some states are more restrictive than others so I don’t know if incest laws apply in this case. But it is still MORALLY wrong.
Actually, her being his aunt isn’t in the article, is it? I’m not seeing it. It’s all down in the comments at the link. I’m not sure where they’re getting that information. You’d think if that were really the case, the headline would be WOMAN SEDUCES NEPHEW AT THANKSGIVING!! Catchy, yes?
Morality has nothing to do with the law.
Isn’t that what you said about statutory rape laws?
Its a moral problem...it shouldn’t be a legal one. Your exact words.
So the same should apply for incest, correct? Just morality. No law needed.
How about bestiality? Just a moral issue.
Gee, I always heard females say they “mature” 2 years, at least, ahead of males, yet, you say a 15 year old is a little girl but a young man. It is disturbing to hear a supposed adult say such a thing. Liberals use such reasoning and statements as you. Children are not sex objects, male or female.
Kind of makes your skin crawl, doesn’t it?
I’d guess it would depend on what would catch your eye.
Some people are predisposed to be sensitive to certain phrases. I guess we know what one of yours is.
The real issue is that he has repressed cougar fantasies. He was all set to cheerlead this situation but then realized afterwards (guess he didn’t read the article) that the situation was incestual.
He has no problem with statutory rape. As long as its an older woman. If it is an older man it makes his skin crawl.
I find both equally repugnant. Anyone who seeks sexual gratification from a child is defective. Anyone who defends them is also defective. There are no lack of willing of age men. Only people with mental problems seek out a child.
“15 year old boys are RARELY a victim when it comes to having sex with a female even if she is over 18 years old.”
So, ah, say that 23 year old “woman” gets preggers. Just how is that 15 year old going to stand up to the responsibility of being the dad? I guess your liberal ways only think of “Do it if it feels good” and not the real legal issue involved.
That 23 year old adult is attempting to engage a minor in legal responsibilties such as parenting that he cannot accept and his parent most likely will not accept. This is why we have laws protecting minors from predatory adults, male or female.
He is no doubt a she. It writes like a chick.
I just want to be sure I understand you correctly.
Are you saying that a 15 year old boy does not know that what he was doing is wrong?
Are you saying that a 15 year old should not be responsible for his own behavior and actions?
If I am understanding you correctly I respectfully choose to disagree.
First, yes I do think a 15 year old boy is old enough to show the beginnings of behaving like a young man. Of course I don’t expect him to be mature beyond his years but he should know right from wrong by then at the very least, don’t you think?
I believe that a 15 year old boy is old enough to know right from wrong in this situation and should behave accordingly. I believe he should be held accountable for his actions rather than be considered a “victim”.
That makes perfect sense.
What doesn’t make sense is that you freely admit that woman-boy is ok, no victims. But man-girl is terrible.
They’re both bad. You can admit you were wrong.
“So, ah, say that 23 year old woman gets preggers. Just how is that 15 year old going to stand up to the responsibility of being the dad? “
Not very well at all. That is part of the reason I wrote in reply 107 the following which apparently you missed or decided to ignore:
“Do I think it is appropriate for a 15 year old to be engaging in such behavior? No I do not.”
He/she likes to pretend that 15 year old boys are sexually mature instead of just getting used to the hormones/feelings/equipment.
A 15 year old boy would trade anything he owned to a woman who promised him sex. If an older woman took his car in exchange, would he have been victimized?
I’d say so...because the boy is SEXUALLY IMMATURE. He doesn’t have experience.
Its like blaming a ship wreck victim for drinking salt water to quench his thirst. They’re not rational, especially when all the blood leaves the brain.
And the difference is that a WOMAN knows that, and can use it. She intentionally seeks an uneven playing field for her own purposes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.