To: bananaman22
If it is “Inevitable” might as well just get start now.
2 posted on
12/09/2011 1:45:24 PM PST by
edcoil
(It is not over until I win.)
To: bananaman22
If it is “Inevitable” might as well just get started now.
3 posted on
12/09/2011 1:45:36 PM PST by
edcoil
(It is not over until I win.)
To: bananaman22
For many years there were four members of the nuclear club, and nuclear war was basically unthinkable. Then China and India joined and, for a time, the staus quo remained.
Even when Israel and South Africa joined the club, nothing really changed. South Africa eventually relinquished their weapons.
Now Pakistan and North Korea have no problem rattling sabres and threatening their neighbors. Iran can't wait to use nukes to destroy Israel. I have no doubt that regimes like these will use nuclear weapons against their neighbors. Additionally they will put those weapons into the hands of surrogates. This will, of course, result in their own destruction.
4 posted on
12/09/2011 1:49:07 PM PST by
Former Proud Canadian
(Obamanomics-We don't need your stinking tar sands oil, or the jobs that go with it.)
To: bananaman22
That might actually solve many of our problems with Af-Pak.
5 posted on
12/09/2011 1:56:03 PM PST by
PGR88
To: bananaman22
How about if they hold it in Iran?
6 posted on
12/09/2011 1:57:59 PM PST by
jessduntno
("I love the man. I think he's a neat man." - Sen. Tom Coburn (R) about B. Hussein Obama)
To: bananaman22
Nawa-e Waqt is a ...conservative Pakistani Islamic daily with a circulation around 125,000 ...To put Nawa-e Waqt’s circulation in context, consider that the conservative Washington Times has a current estimated circulation of 50,000 An idiotic apples and oranges comparison.
A "conservative" Muslim is one that espouses Islamic extremism.
A "conservative" American is one that advocates adherence to the Constitution.
And the Washington Times is hardly a mainstream publication
7 posted on
12/09/2011 2:00:59 PM PST by
kidd
To: bananaman22
Nuclear conflict. Yeah, that’ll solve the water problem.
Mutually assured destruction, indeed.
8 posted on
12/09/2011 2:06:35 PM PST by
lurk
To: bananaman22
Won’t the fallout contaminate all that water?
9 posted on
12/09/2011 2:23:36 PM PST by
Signalman
To: bananaman22
Supporting suspicion that the authors may be insane:
Hydroelectric dams still require that he water actually run through the turbines and through the dam don’t they?
This seems to fly in the face of claims that the water will be cut off doesn’t it?
11 posted on
12/09/2011 3:23:39 PM PST by
Sequoyah101
(Half the people are below average.)
To: bananaman22
Pakistan has newspapers? Really, who new?
12 posted on
12/09/2011 3:23:56 PM PST by
SampleMan
(Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
To: bananaman22
Pakistan has newspapers? Really, who new?
13 posted on
12/09/2011 3:24:15 PM PST by
SampleMan
(Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
To: bananaman22
Let them blow each other to hell then those left can drink atomic water.
14 posted on
12/09/2011 3:31:46 PM PST by
Terry Mross
(I'll only vote for a second party)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson