Skip to comments.Ron Paul destroys Rick Santorum on Iran During Ames Iowa Debate and all I got was the zot
Posted on 12/28/2011 5:03:15 PM PST by Bluestateredman
Click link to watch the video of a FOX news debate featuring Ron Paul giving Rick Santorum a history lesson on Iran
Not Breaking News, Paultard.
My term "Leftwingtard" is similarly misspelled for the same reason.
And you sound like a liberal trying to tell us all how to speak because you're offended by a word.
First to claim victim status reveals himself...
“How anybody can call themselves conservative (or even sane) and support this raving lunatic is beyond me.”
I think the $3 term for it is Cognitive Dissonance.
RE: Ive been on this site for what I consider a long time, and Ive never been pounced on like this for what I consider a rather tame posting.
Well here’s a clue for you. Make a post supporting a liberal or a Jew-hating, American-hating, mentally unstable lunatic and you just might be an idiot worthy of public flogging.
I watched it and I'd seen that exchange before.
It was a typical whiny, screechy, Code Pink-inspired Ron Paul rant and Rick Santorum was the one who made sense.
Ron Paul wasn't schooling Santorum on the history of our relationship with Iran; he was spinning it to blame Iran's 1979 hostage-taking and subsequent vile actions on the US.
Iran is to blame for all of that evil...NOT the US.
What do you think? Separated at birth?
...Oh, and how did all of those miniature poodles and chihuahuas get into the debate hall?
I heard ‘em all start yapping when Santorum was speaking. They sounded like they wanted to nip some ankles or something.
Do you prefer being called Anti-semitic? An anarchist? Those are pretty much synonymous with the term “Paultard”
Ron Paul’s foreign policy experience died with the advent of technology. When Washington delivered his now famous farewell address, the idea of staying out of Europe’s affairs was rational, feasible, and smart. There were no airplane’s, ICBM’s, and the US was separated by two massive oceans from the world’s greatest conflicts.
But in case you didn’t notice, the world has progressed since 1796. Evil men have come up with new, quicker, and more efficient ways of killing large numbers of people. The time where good men can sit on the sideline and do nothing...is over.
Iran wants to commit genocide. They must be stopped at all costs. It’s always easier to PREVENT than it is to deal with the problem when it’s too late.
Like Paul, you fail to realize that about 75% or more of the world would love nothing more than to see the US collapse as the dominant force in the world, because we are the only nation in the world that dares to keep dictators at bay....and those evil men know that (not because we’re mongering empire-builders like Paul suggest).
Personally, what’s happening in a place like North Korea and Cuba pi$$es me off. In NK, you have MILLIONS of people in work camps and prisons with no hope under an totalitarian military state. We should liberate those people because its the right and humane thing to do. We should have also took out Castro in Cuba to stop the massive oppression there. And hell yeah, I’m all for putting Iran’s leaders in graves as soon as possible so they can get on their way to Hell ASAP.
Ron Paul’s foreign policy views are to the left of Obama.
Santorum lost 1 out of the 4 races he ran in a deep blue state as an unabashed Conservative. Can you point out any other candidates in this Primary that can say the same? He lost in a terrible GOP year against a Pro Life Rat who talked as a traditional values believer. On the other hand Paul never even ran state wide in TX because he knows no one would vote for him. That there is pathetic.
You know what gets my attention?
This paulbot is so uncertain of the truth that he couldn’t just be happy that Paul was up in the polls today.
He had to dig up some old stuff from the Ames debate to counter Santorums rise today.
I smell fear.
On the historical facts he is correct but on everything else he’s wrong. For the same reason the British and the French should be the ones to clean up the middle east, as they caused the problem to begin with after WW1.
I only ask for a title that makes sense. RP = nuke winter, not because he’s a warmonger, but clueless.
Paul has mostly excellent positions. I’d bet 70%. Where he screws the pooch, is related to the 12’vers, and international capital flows. The fact that people don’t understand MAD, and why it does not apply to Iran, most likely N. Korea, many of the splinter states of china(near future) and parts of south america does not make it less scary.
Santorum has a better economic, and f-policy then the rest, he’s not electable. VP or Sec state, to another run-maybe.
Change the channel, idiot.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.