Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

First Lady rips 'angry black woman' image
Yahoo.com

Posted on 01/11/2012 11:27:22 AM PST by Son-Joshua

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-71 last
Comment #51 Removed by Moderator

Comment #52 Removed by Moderator

To: Son-Joshua
First lady Michelle Obama is challenging assertions she has forcefully imposed her will on White House aides and says people have inaccurately tried to portray her as "some kind of angry black woman."

I agree. She is "THE angry black woman."

53 posted on 01/11/2012 1:38:55 PM PST by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

She makes Angela Davis look like Martha Stewart.


54 posted on 01/11/2012 1:42:16 PM PST by RinaseaofDs (Does beheading qualify as 'breaking my back', in the Jeffersonian sense of the expression?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

“She is “THE angry black woman.” “

The fat @$$ed, fugly never a lady first-lady created that image by being herself.


55 posted on 01/11/2012 1:49:37 PM PST by GGpaX4DumpedTea (I am a tea party descendant - steeped in the Constitutional legacy handed down by the Founders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound

Makes me laugh every time.

The resemblance is uncanny.


56 posted on 01/11/2012 1:49:54 PM PST by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: OB1kNOb

They say that the “eyes are the doors into the soul.” Need anything else be said.


57 posted on 01/11/2012 1:56:20 PM PST by Son-Joshua (son-joshua)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Winstons Julia

I don’t believe that what I wrote was not stated well and succinctly. It certainly was not juvenile garbage. So why did you critize me? Certainly you don’t feel that if Michelle makes such a public statement that we should refrain from making our own in reply. In my opinion I feel Michelle was being very racist herself and toward herself by using the word “Black” when, according to today’s standards, we are ignore the issue of race and see her and every other black woman as just “women” without the descriptive adjective of color. Isn’t that the goal that has been set by the PC movement? So why does she not practice what she preaches? And why can’t I point out her contradiction?


58 posted on 01/11/2012 2:00:16 PM PST by CitizenM (Obama's legacy will be to be remembered as The architect of the decline of the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Son-Joshua

How about ‘Angry Wookie’?

She could put a chill down Chewbacca’s spine...


59 posted on 01/11/2012 2:27:30 PM PST by Wildbill22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Son-Joshua
Michelle is an angry, bitter woman; I don't read minds so I cannot say for certain what bedevils her. She seems to believe that expensive clothing and jewelry will make up for the ugliness that comes from within, but it won't; it never does.

She could be an attractive woman, but usually she is dressed in a costume-like fashion, wearing clothing that is almost grotesque and not at all flattering to her.

I cringe when people call her First Wookie or make other comments of that sort. This is not only in poor taste, but it trivializes Michelle, who is not trivial, but a misguided, dangerous individual actively involved in trashing this country.
60 posted on 01/11/2012 2:36:52 PM PST by Nepeta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Winstons Julia
Has she inserted herself any more than any other first lady?

Any more or any less is a call I just won't make. At this point in time, I don't really care about lampooning other first ladies such as Hilary Clinton although Cankles has provided such a wealth of material.

I’m not lecturing anyone.

Sure you are.

I’m just stating my opinion.

I’ve a right to do that, correct?


Absolutely. However, the provision of a "SOAPBOX" is not an entitlement or a given and the expectation that others may also have opinions that won't vary from your own is unrealistic.

Personally, I think I’m a hoot most of the time.

I'm really glad that you yourself find you yourself funny.

And?

If you're as much of a hoot as you claim to be, you might want to try to re-apply some of those knee-slappers you've been saving up for a Michelle Obama thread. Like this one.

“You were never ceded authority to presume, at least by me, and so you can talk to the hand as far as I’m concerned.”

But you presume the authority to tell me to talk to your hand? Grow up.

I presume authority to speak for myself. And that is what QUOTE as far as I'm concerned. UNQUOTE means.

Perhaps English is just not your first language. As I said above, I speak for myself and no one else. I don't presume any rank or authority. That's why I'm not in the habit of wandering onto threads and admonishing others on their choice of topics. I do however, reserve the right, much like yourself to offer my own opinion, when and where its possible to do so. There is always the ability to make a choice to join a thread or not.

You see Julia, I am now making the choice to leave this one.

Have a nice day.

61 posted on 01/11/2012 2:54:32 PM PST by pyx (Rule#1.The LEFT lies.Rule#2.See Rule#1. IF THE LEFT CONTROLS THE LANGUAGE, IT CONTROLS THE ARGUMENT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER
Those shoulders are just too small !

ROFLMAO !

62 posted on 01/11/2012 2:56:27 PM PST by pyx (Rule#1.The LEFT lies.Rule#2.See Rule#1. IF THE LEFT CONTROLS THE LANGUAGE, IT CONTROLS THE ARGUMENT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: pyx

HUGE TEXT!


63 posted on 01/11/2012 3:04:09 PM PST by Winstons Julia (Hello OWS? We don't need a revolution like China's; China needs a revolution like OURS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: CitizenM

I want to give you an apology. You are right.

I think I took out on you what I have seen on many Michelle Obama threads here and that wasn’t fair to you.


64 posted on 01/11/2012 3:12:23 PM PST by Winstons Julia (Hello OWS? We don't need a revolution like China's; China needs a revolution like OURS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: NEMDF

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-501708_162-57356780/mrs-obama-tired-of-angry-black-woman-stereotype/?tag=mncol;lst;2


65 posted on 01/11/2012 3:13:21 PM PST by CIDKauf (No man has a good enough memory to be a successful liar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: trisham
Click

66 posted on 01/11/2012 4:38:02 PM PST by RedMDer (Forward With Confidence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: RedMDer

:)


67 posted on 01/11/2012 4:48:46 PM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: RedMDer

:)


68 posted on 01/11/2012 4:48:56 PM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: xtinct
I hear you about the busy body, dopey trips...But what really bugs me is the slush funds she set up via Barry through HHS.

I'm kind of out of energy explaining just how bad what she has done is. I've done a lot of research (just came about the orig info by serendipity) and have tried to share the news. But, nobody ever seems to be interested. It is indeed a grifter scheme the woman is running. We are talking the “Let's Move” b.s. It is a definite slush fund running through HHS. I'm not going to waste time and space listing the details, as it hasn't made an impact, when I found the info 4 months ago.

Frustrating. There is a story here with Mrs. Obama, and it ain't as tame as most think. Not pathetic trips and $15,000 a day make-up artists. I'm talking in the mega billions.

69 posted on 01/11/2012 5:53:41 PM PST by Pigsley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Son-Joshua

I had never thought to describe her as an “angry black woman” - but now that I know that it bothers her so I think I’ll start.


70 posted on 01/11/2012 7:42:07 PM PST by eclecticEel (Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness: 7/4/1776 - 3/21/2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eclecticEel

Angry Black Woman, ABW

Anybody But Wobama.

Close enough...


71 posted on 01/11/2012 7:48:09 PM PST by Kickass Conservative (Liberals, Useful Idiots Voting for Useless Idiots...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-71 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson