Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I dreamed of trolling against Newt in my maidenform bra and all I got was this big old zot
Washington Times ^ | Jan 20, 2012 | Stephen Dinan

Posted on 01/20/2012 7:33:09 PM PST by Hoodat

ORANGEBURG, S.C. — Newt Gingrich on Friday backed at least a portion of the Dream Act, saying that he would grant a path to citizenship to illegal immigrant youths who agree to sign up and serve in the U.S. military.

That’s a much tighter standard than the full Dream Act, which President Obama wants. That legislation would allow legal status and an eventual path to citizenship for children and young adults who join the military, but would also apply to those who go to college — a much broader class of people.

“I am opposed to anybody who came here illegally getting citizenship. That’s entirely wrong,” the GOP presidential candidate and former House speaker told a young man who asked about illegal immigrant students. “The only exception I would make is if young people, the ones you are dealing with, are willing to join the American military and serve the United States.”

Speaking a day before South Carolina’s GOP primary, Mr. Gingrich said that would put them on par with any other foreign-born legal resident who joins the U.S. military, and who under the law has a path to citizenship.

Mr. Gingrich’s stance puts him in between Mr. Obama and GOP rival Mitt Romney, who has said he would veto the Dream Act.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Cheese, Moose, Sister
KEYWORDS: zot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-153 next last
To: gswilder
And I saw a video of him last night talking about replacing Obamacare with another similar plan.

You're finally getting Newt.

He is a technocrat. Full of "ideas" but they all involve tinkering with Gov't.

He doesn't really have the vision to return power to the power notwithstanding his "soaring" rhetoric.

Newt is unsteady and will disappoint. Guaranteed.

51 posted on 01/20/2012 9:06:55 PM PST by Siena Dreaming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Siena Dreaming

Should be “power to the people”.


52 posted on 01/20/2012 9:10:46 PM PST by Siena Dreaming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: keepitreal
So, in that case, one doesn't even need a citizen board to use any discretion at all...

True, and establishing guidelines for which people are given legal status is one aspect of immigration law that would have to be done centrally or chaos would result.

This local board nonsense is a totally dumb idea and an insult to every citizen in its pretense that local communities would have some meaningful decision making role.

Newt's a disaster waiting to happen on the immigration issue. We'll have to have a Congress to keep the next president in check, whoever it might be.

53 posted on 01/20/2012 9:11:18 PM PST by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

I think it’s down to if we aren’t going to have a candidate who is completely for us, at least it’s fun to cheer for one who is so good at being against them. This is a strange election, good reason to oppose any one of them but we can’t, we have to pick one and support them, this is all there will be now.


54 posted on 01/20/2012 9:13:32 PM PST by mrsmel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat
I wish that someone would tell people that you don't have to be a citizen to be in the United States Military. We have tons of them in the Navy. This is a win for Newt quite frankly especially if he knows this is happening already. The only thing is that they can not have a security clearance. There are plenty of jobs in the military that do not require a security clearance. Oh and they do apply for citizenship once the time limit is acquired. Not all of them but the majority. My goodness it used to be a requirement that we take a certain percentage from the Philippines every year. That has been lifted but they are fully allowed to join the military from Philippines or anywhere else in the World that they would like to serve.
55 posted on 01/20/2012 9:13:32 PM PST by napscoordinator (Newt MUST win the nomination to get rid of Romney and Obama....Dear God let November 2012 go our way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReneeLynn

You’re really on an anti-Newt rampage tonight. Who are you supporting? Mitt or Santorum or Paul

FYI

To: Hoodat
Look, if FR is not your cup of tea just move on. Continue trolling and you will be moved along and I can guaranfreepingtee you that.

401 posted on Friday, January 20, 2012 6:15:59 PM by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is brewing!! Impeach the corrupt Marxist bastard!!)


56 posted on 01/20/2012 9:14:34 PM PST by billys kid (Everything in Massachusetts is illegal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Siena Dreaming

For real.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ou55-L6Eq_o

If you search “citizen immigration boards” on youtube, you will see him talking about it over several debates.


57 posted on 01/20/2012 9:16:09 PM PST by keepitreal ( Good manners never go out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

DIttos!!!!


58 posted on 01/20/2012 9:21:14 PM PST by GoMonster (GO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

Romney is the enemy, after fighting him for so many years it gets tiresome to listen to his cult people and having to repeat ourselves.


59 posted on 01/20/2012 9:23:31 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: freedomfiter2

Yeah...like Sharon Angle, Chrisine Odonell etc...etc...It called you actually have to get the majority of votes to actually win. Just wanted to give you heads up on how democracy works. You don’t get majority of votes you don’t win...aka once in a life time thing.:)


60 posted on 01/20/2012 9:25:04 PM PST by GoMonster (GO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat

“saying that he would grant a path to citizenship to illegal immigrant youths who agree to sign up and serve”

The US has been doing this with the Filipinos for years and years. As said above the numbers would be minuscule. Hoodat is trying to make a mountain out of a molehill but does not know his history.


61 posted on 01/20/2012 9:25:17 PM PST by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GoMonster

You give Rush a pass for “all he’s done,” but give Newt zero credit for bringing the GOP its first majority in 40 years while Myth Romney was disparaging Ronald Reagan. Gotcha.

I guess it was all Rick Santorum’s doing.

Hank


62 posted on 01/20/2012 9:28:00 PM PST by County Agent Hank Kimball (Screw it. Newt's the smartest candidate and the guy I want to see debating Obummer. Flame away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: newheart; Hoodat
Perhaps the quote from George Romney on Hoodat's About page is a clue to whom he (or she) supports.

No kidding, a hard core romneybot.

63 posted on 01/20/2012 9:28:04 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Wow, that was very clever and subtle. You put Newt’s name in a sentence with Luis Guiterrez and Dick Durbin, so I therefore MUST conclude that he’s just like them.

With “logic” like that, you should do opp. research for Myth Romney.

If you aren’t already.

Hank


64 posted on 01/20/2012 9:30:21 PM PST by County Agent Hank Kimball (Screw it. Newt's the smartest candidate and the guy I want to see debating Obummer. Flame away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: GoMonster; Jim Robinson

So you are all for Mitt Romney?


65 posted on 01/20/2012 9:35:46 PM PST by ConfidentConservative (If my people shall humble themselves and pray,I will hear from Heaven and heal their land.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gswilder

So is this what we have come to as conservatives?

Support a serial adulterer
Support a person who supports replacing Obamacare (said there were a good 300 pages of Obamacare)
Endorsed a government mandate in healthcare in 1994 & 1995, and beyond.
In 2003, Newt talked about how the government has to take the lead in regulatory control of healthcare
In 2005, he talks about redistribution of wealth to the poor to support healthcare
His healthcare thinktank has taken in $30 million from insurance companies
In 2011, Newt opposed Paul Ryans medicare reform. Said it was too much radical reform.
Newt claimed FDR was the greatest president of the 20th century
Support a person who made a global warming ad with Pelosi
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VuBd1atfhQ4
Supported Government subsidies for Ethanol to reduce GHG’s
Said he believed carbon emissions are going up in the atmosphere
Support a person who would have signed the dream act
Support a person who goes after capitalism (Bain)
Only speaker sanctioned with Ethics issues
Forced to resign from the house (400 members, including 100 republicans voted him out)
Made $1.5m from lobbying Freddie and Fannie
Was critical of Bush’s anti-terror policies
Opposed the surge in Iraq

These are just a few things I am aware of. And they are not conspiracies, lies or things taken out of context. Almost all the items above, you can find a video of Newt saying them in his own words.

To me, it seems like Newt is flipping and flopping as much as Romney.


66 posted on 01/20/2012 9:37:28 PM PST by gswilder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
"No kidding, a hard core romneybot."

Of course....that makes sense, doesn't it? He's seeing the numbers tonight showing his lying, scummy, born-on-third-base-and-thinks-he-hit-a-triple, leftist empty-suit getting trashed in SC and he's lashing out.

Hey, Myth'll probably still win. But for a Mythbot to call Newt a liberal? Really. It's like Janet Reno calling someone ugly, or Chris Christie calling someone fat.

Or Myth Romney calling someone a lizard.

Hank

67 posted on 01/20/2012 9:38:04 PM PST by County Agent Hank Kimball (Screw it. Newt's the smartest candidate and the guy I want to see debating Obummer. Flame away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: GoMonster

Newt 2012
Fact Check: Latest Ad by Pro-Romney Super PAC “Restore Our Future” Contains Numerous Lies and Falsehoods

Atlanta, GA - Newt 2012 released a fact sheet today responding to the latest dishonest attack ad aired by pro-Romney Super-Pac “Restore our Future”:

Falsehood: Freddie Mac paid Newt $30,000 an hour - $1.6 million.

The Truth:

“I think less than maybe once a month, they [Freddie Mac] would drop by. We’d spend an hour [talking].”
-Newt Gingrich, On the Record with Greta Van Susteren, 11/17/11

It is this remark which the Super-Pac uses to justify this gross distortion.

First, Freddie Mac was a client of the Gingrich Group, a firm with thirty employees and offices in three cities. The client fees were not paid directly to Newt, they were paid to the company, and the vast majority of it went to staff salaries, health insurance, rent and other overhead.

Second, like any consulting firm, a great deal of work and research goes into the recommendations given. Newt and his staff spent time preparing for these meetings, putting in hours of research to bring a well informed opinion. To report that a one hour meeting is the extent of their work is ignorant of standard business practice.

Falsehood: Gingrich teamed up with Nancy Pelosi on global warming.

The Truth: Newt absolutely opposes “cap and trade,” which Nancy Pelosi supports, as well as any system of taxing carbon emissions. He testified before Congress against the Nancy Pelosi-backed cap and trade effort in 2009 and led a grassroots effort while he was the Chairman of American Solutions to block its passage in the House and Senate. Newt repeatedly states there is no scientific evidence to justify a large government, centralized response.

Falsehood: Together [Gingrich & Pelosi] they co-sponsored a bill that gave $60 million a year to a U.N. program supporting China’s brutal “One Child” policy.

The Truth: Newt never voted for this legislation and this never became law. Additionally, Ronald Reagan’s Mexico City Policy was in place in 1989, which would have prevented any money going toward abortions in support of China’s One Child Policy:

“As to US contributions to the United Nations Fund for Population Activities, their continuation will be conditional on “concrete assurances” that no part of the US monies will be used for abortion and the Fund does not support abortion or coercive family planning programs.”
-US Policy Statement for the International Conference on Population, 1984

This policy applied to any legislation passed through 1993, and implicitly prohibits any US funds from going to China’s One Child policy.

Falsehood: As Speaker, Gingrich even supported taxpayer funding of some abortions.

The Truth:

“House Speaker Newt Gingrich on Sunday supported the availability of federally- financed abortions for poor women who are victims of rape or incest.”
-Chicago Tribune, April 10, 1995

Newt supported Hyde amendment language, which prohibits federal funding for abortions. This language often makes exceptions for rape, incest, or the life of the mother, and is supported by conservative members of Congress. These clauses were found in the Republican supported Stupak Amendment to President Obama’s healthcare bill. Newt recognized that an outright ban on federal funding of abortion would not be signed by Bill Clinton, and worked to remove federal abortion funding as much as possible in the existing political framework.

Falsehood: [Newt] was fined $300,000 for ethics violations by a Republican Congress.

The Truth: Eighty-four politically motivated ethics charges were filed against Newt when he was Speaker of the House regarding the use of tax exempt funds for a college course he taught titled “Renewing American Civilization.” Eighty-three of the eighty-four charges were found to be without merit and dropped.

The remaining charge had to do with contradictory documents prepared by Newt’s lawyer supplied during the course of the investigation. Newt took responsibility for the error and agreed to reimburse the committee the cost of the investigation into that discrepancy. The agreement specifically noted that the payment was not a fine, but instead a “cost assessment.” The House vote affirmed this agreement.

In 1999, after a 3 ½ year investigation, the Internal Revenue Service (under President Bill Clinton, nonetheless) concluded that Gingrich did not violate any tax laws, leading renowned CNN Investigative Reporter Brooks Jackson to remark on air “it turns out [Gingrich] was right and those who accused him of tax fraud were wrong.”

For more facts about Newt Gingrich’s record, please visit Newt.org/answers.

###

Contact: R.C. Hammond
rch@newt.org


68 posted on 01/20/2012 9:40:38 PM PST by ConfidentConservative (If my people shall humble themselves and pray,I will hear from Heaven and heal their land.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: freekitty

Get with the program.Perry was torn down on these here message boards for his immigration like it was a mortal sin but Gingrich gets a pass on all.Because everybody got chewed up and spat out because ONE didn’t run and there is no one left.As well as every 4 years we hear ‘I M M I G R A T I O N R E F O R M REIGN IN B I G GOVERNMENT E D U C A T I O N REFORM.But because the country is on her knees J O B S are all that counts so they will BS us again and do nothing about any of it but maybe get some jobs back to appease us.Anybody but Obama so anything goes...


69 posted on 01/20/2012 9:43:05 PM PST by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: GoMonster

Bozell Statement: Newt Was Found Innocent Nearly 13 Years Ago – Networks Have Yet To Report It

By Brent Bozell | December 07, 2011 | 14:40
50
Change font size: A | A
Brent Bozell’s picture

Following the recent threats from Nancy Pelosi and the heavy brush with which the media are painting Newt Gingrich as unethical, the Media Research Center is now calling on the networks to seize the moment and report the truth from nearly 13 years ago.

It has been 4,689 days since the IRS formally cleared Newt Gingrich of any violation of tax law. It’s been 4,689 days since ABC, CBS, and NBC have had the opportunity to report it. What the heck. Why not today? Now is the time for these networks to report the truth for once. The networks owe it to the American people to report the fact that in 1999 the IRS completely vindicated Gingrich.

Between December 15, 1996 and January 31, 1997 the network morning and evening newscasts filed a staggering 244 stories. Total number of network stories on the news that Newt was completely innocent? Zero. That’s beyond pathetic.

Oh and what about CNN? We found that the cable network filed one — count ‘em, one — story. They’re probably exhausted by all that effort, so we’ll let them off the hook.

See Bozell’s column “ Newt Is Vindicated, But Nobody Knows It” in February of 1999, detailing how the IRS cleared Gingrich of any violation of the tax laws but was spiked from being covered by ABC, CBS and NBC News.

Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/brent-bozell/2011/12/07/bozell-statement-newt-was-found-innocent-nearly-13-years-ago-networks-#ixzz1ikUZ4olc


70 posted on 01/20/2012 9:44:13 PM PST by ConfidentConservative (If my people shall humble themselves and pray,I will hear from Heaven and heal their land.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: GoMonster

House Rep’s statement on Newt Gingrich’s Non Fine...

Numerous statements from elected officials and other individuals associated with the Committee’s investigation make it clear that the sanction levied against Speaker Gingrich was nothing more than a cost assessment. In presenting the Report to the Members of the House, former Congresswoman Nancy Johnson (R-CT) characterized the Speaker’s payment in the following manner:

“Likewise in past cases where the committee imposed monetary sanctions on a Member, the committee found that the Member had been personally enriched by the misconduct. The committee made no such finding against Representative Gingrich, yet recommends that a cost reimbursement of $300,000 be paid to the House by him.”

Likewise, Democrat Congressman Adam Schiff (D-CA), a member of the Investigation Subcommittee, described the Report findings in the Congressional Record as follows:

“Based upon the allegation, the violations we found, the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct on a 7-to-1 vote, full committee now, entire committee, recommended the following penalty. It recommended a reprimand and a cost assessment of $300,000. . . . We set $300,000 as the estimated costs of that portion of the investigation that dealt with clearing up the misstatements that we received, which may be begun to be prepared in Mr. Gingrich’s law firm, but for which he is responsible as Member of the House.”

Indeed, even Democrat Congressman (now Senator) Ben Cardin (D-MD) agreed on the proper classification of the Speaker’s $300,000 payment. In his remarks to the House urging adoption of the Ethics Committee Report and Resolution, then-Congressman Cardin described the proposed sanction against Speaker Gingrich in the following manner:

“It provides a reprimand plus a required $300,000 contribution by Mr. Gingrich to the cost of these proceedings.”

Moreover, in the transcript of the sanctions proceedings before the House Committee on Standards of Official Conduct, Special Counsel to the House Ethics Committee James Cole could not have made it more clear when he responded to questions from Congressman Thomas Sawyer (D-OH) as follows:

“In addition, this is not a fine that we are recommending. The rule book says that a fine is an appropriate sanction when a member has received personal gain. And as Mr. Smith had asked and as I told him, no, we did not find that.”

In sum, there was never any fine levied against Speaker Gingrich as a result of the findings of the House Ethics Committee Report referenced in the subject advertisements. Any statement to the contrary in any broadcast communication produced on behalf of Governor Romney, any other presidential candidate, or any SuperPAC is all at once false, misleading, and defamatory.

http://gretawire.foxnewsinsider.com/2012/01/06/gispeaker-gingrich-says-it-is-false-and-defamatory-he-unleashes-his-lawyer-about-romney-superpac-and-official-romney-ads-for-president/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+foxnewsin


71 posted on 01/20/2012 9:46:15 PM PST by ConfidentConservative (If my people shall humble themselves and pray,I will hear from Heaven and heal their land.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat

Hey - it’s OK ! He’ll beat Obama in the debates . ; ) Duh !


72 posted on 01/20/2012 9:46:28 PM PST by sushiman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReneeLynn
Immigration and the demographic, social, and political nightmare it is causing is not high on Jim's list. Back in 2006, many of us who opposed Bush's lunacy were temporarily or permanently banned.

Few people are more predisposed to liking Newt than I. But I cannot get past his sabotage of the immigration reform movement in 1995 and 1995, when there was bipartisan and even liberal support for reducing immigration, and his silly ideas today.

73 posted on 01/20/2012 9:47:14 PM PST by rmlew ("Mosques are our barracks, minarets our bayonets, domes our helmets, the believers our soldiers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ConfidentConservative
For more facts about Newt Gingrich’s record, please visit Newt.org/answers

These Newtbashers are like ABC News--they don' need no steenkin' facts.

74 posted on 01/20/2012 9:49:19 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: GoMonster

bye


75 posted on 01/20/2012 9:51:33 PM PST by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is brewing!! Impeach the corrupt Marxist bastard!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

They are BACKED UP, I know how difficult it is for some to be able to look up the truth but it is there IF they want to find it. ;)


76 posted on 01/20/2012 9:53:08 PM PST by ConfidentConservative (If my people shall humble themselves and pray,I will hear from Heaven and heal their land.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat
"Newt Gingrich on Friday backed at least a portion of the Dream Act, saying that he would grant a path to citizenship to illegal immigrant youths who agree to sign up and serve in the U.S. military."

In other words Gingrich is in favor of a policy that has been in place for at least 200 years.

77 posted on 01/20/2012 9:58:17 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Thank you so much!


78 posted on 01/20/2012 9:58:25 PM PST by ConfidentConservative (If my people shall humble themselves and pray,I will hear from Heaven and heal their land.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: GoMonster

Look, pal, they were conservative tea party candidates who were backed by the grassroots and with our hard work and support won their respective primaries. Elite establishment RINOs like Karl Rove then torpedoed them nightly on FOX News, just like he and his establishment RINO friends and dumbass RINO trolls like you are trying to do to Newt. NO MORE!! We’ve declared war on you turncoat tools and idiots!!

Buh bye!!

Carry on.


79 posted on 01/20/2012 9:58:25 PM PST by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is brewing!! Impeach the corrupt Marxist bastard!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Mariner; Hoodat

Hoodat is an idiot troll whose days are numbered on FR.


80 posted on 01/20/2012 9:59:42 PM PST by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is brewing!! Impeach the corrupt Marxist bastard!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Mariner; Hoodat; Jim Robinson

How stupid is hoodat to think that this is any different than policy that has been in place for 200 years.


81 posted on 01/20/2012 10:00:08 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat

Oh, hell. Why drag this out? Get the hell off of this conservative site, troll. Go troll for Romney or Paul or whomever on some other site!!

Buh, bye.


82 posted on 01/20/2012 10:01:49 PM PST by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is brewing!! Impeach the corrupt Marxist bastard!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Siena Dreaming

A few good illegal Muslims, Mexican cartel runners and gay Haitians in the mix will make our military a stronger, kinder and more diverse line of defense for our Counrty. God did say the most important thing was for us to love on another. Ain’t this new America just great! //s


83 posted on 01/20/2012 10:02:00 PM PST by not2worry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Siena Dreaming

Your recent rash of problems with FR has been solved.

Change the freaking channel already. Delete your FR cookies and bookmark. Click and troll to your heart’s content, ELSEWHERE!!


84 posted on 01/20/2012 10:07:33 PM PST by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is brewing!! Impeach the corrupt Marxist bastard!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

You’re going to need a small broom to affix upside down on your keyboard!


85 posted on 01/20/2012 10:11:10 PM PST by going hot (Happiness is a momma deuce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Been looking forward to a few of these you have taken out.


86 posted on 01/20/2012 10:17:54 PM PST by ConfidentConservative (If my people shall humble themselves and pray,I will hear from Heaven and heal their land.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: eddie willers
Sorry but if some young man or woman is willing to put his or her butt on the line fighting and serving our military then why not give them a shot at making it

The Romans held out that particular carrot and it worked rather well for them.

I'd love to hear Victor Davis Hanson's take on that -- in particular, if it merely represented one more step in Rome's decline.

Cheers!

87 posted on 01/20/2012 10:19:03 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ReneeLynn

Check the title of this thread.


88 posted on 01/20/2012 10:21:18 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 50mm

All for you. ;)


89 posted on 01/20/2012 10:30:22 PM PST by ConfidentConservative (If my people shall humble themselves and pray,I will hear from Heaven and heal their land.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Lady; 50mm

A thread for the ages.

A triple zot by the Boss himself at posts 75(GoMonster),82(Hoodat) and 84(Siena Dreaming).

The judges are putting up signs that all read “10”.


90 posted on 01/20/2012 10:33:54 PM PST by exit82 (Democrats are the enemies of freedom. We have ideas-the Dems only have ideology.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Will88

We can use illegals to do the “military service” citizens won’t do....


91 posted on 01/20/2012 10:39:39 PM PST by TheBattman (Isn't the lesser evil... still evil?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat
Good Night, Good Bye, &

GO NEWT!!!

92 posted on 01/20/2012 10:43:23 PM PST by onyx (PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC - DONATE MONTHLY! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat; Admin Moderator; Jim Robinson; DJ MacWoW; trisham; musicman; Lady Jag; JoeProBono
"I dreamed of trolling against Newt in my maidenform bra and all I got was this big old zot"



ROTFLMYhoodat-romneyOFF!!!!!

93 posted on 01/20/2012 10:49:17 PM PST by onyx (PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC - DONATE MONTHLY! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrsmel

Sorry... but the November election may very well be my first since I began voting, to skip the President box (or screen with the new voting machines).

I thought I liked Santorum until he started spouting off his anti-Constitutional/freedom views...


94 posted on 01/20/2012 10:50:03 PM PST by TheBattman (Isn't the lesser evil... still evil?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat; not2worry

You’re not immune to the zot either my friend. Leftists, MittBots, PaulBots, RINOs, Karl Rove establishment types and trolls of many stripes and colors have one-by-one driven our leading grassroots conservative candidates out of the race. They worked for years on Palin, then Perry, then Cain, then Bachmann, now Newt. When ever a non-establishment, non-RINO conservative gets into the lead they open fire and 24/7 trash and torpedo until they drive them out.

NO MORE!!

If you want to troll and trash our conservative candidates, take your business elsewhere. PaulBots can take it to a liberaltaraian site. RomneyBots to FOX News. Trolls to DU. I don’t care where you go, but if you’re here to trash Newt, I’m gunning for your azz!!

WAR IS HELL!!

REBELLION IS HERE!!

DON’T TREAD ON ME!!


95 posted on 01/20/2012 10:51:02 PM PST by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is brewing!! Impeach the corrupt Marxist bastard!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Old Lady

Post 90 was meant for you.


96 posted on 01/20/2012 10:54:23 PM PST by exit82 (Democrats are the enemies of freedom. We have ideas-the Dems only have ideology.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
In other words Gingrich is in favor of a policy that has been in place for at least 200 years.

It is amazing and a little sad that it took 77 posts before that simple truth was pointed out.

97 posted on 01/20/2012 10:59:08 PM PST by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart; TheOldLady; Bikkuri

See Post 90.

A triple zot within 9 posts by the Boss.

Eminently ode-able.


98 posted on 01/20/2012 11:40:10 PM PST by exit82 (Democrats are the enemies of freedom. We have ideas-the Dems only have ideology.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: GoMonster

If you call all the crap you’ve been spewing on this thread being “informed” you might want to get a dictionary.

90% lies.


99 posted on 01/20/2012 11:47:19 PM PST by moonhawk (Romney tucks his tail and licks the hand that beats him. Newt rips it off at the shoulder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Hahaha, wasn’t the title when I posted. ZOT! :)


100 posted on 01/21/2012 12:30:02 AM PST by ReneeLynn (Socialism is SO yesterday. Fascism, it's the new black. Mmm mmm mmm...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-153 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson