Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Maxine Waters Ethics Case: 6 Committee Members Recuse Themselves
Los Angeles Times ^ | Richard Simon

Posted on 02/17/2012 12:05:05 PM PST by AnTiw1

The tumultuous ethics case against Rep. Maxine Waters, one of Los Angeles’ most enduring politicians, took another strange turn Friday as six members of the House Ethics Committee recused themselves from considering the charges against her.

Committee Chairman Jo Bonner (R-Ala.) said that all five of the panel’s Republicans, including himself, and one Democrat were taking the unusual action of recusing themselves from further involvement in the long-running Waters case "out of an abundance of caution and to avoid even an appearance of unfairness." Six new House members immediately were named to the bipartisan panel to consider all matters related to the Waters case.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: corruption; cultureofcorruption; gopcowards; investigation; marxine; maxinewaters; racecard; waters
Waters, a South Los Angeles political fixture since the 1970s, has been accused of intervening on behalf of a bank where her husband owned stock and served on the board. She has denied wrongdoing. The case has taken on greater importance for Waters, who is in line to succeed retiring Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) as the top Democrat on the House Financial Services Committee.

The investigation against Waters has been anything but usual. It has been sidetracked twice -- once by the committee's decision to put off a trial to conduct further investigation and then by allegations of misconduct against the ethics staff.



1 posted on 02/17/2012 12:05:21 PM PST by AnTiw1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AnTiw1
Lifting up the rug getting ready to sweep. . . . .
No damn wonder they only have 9% approval. . . . . .
2 posted on 02/17/2012 12:12:54 PM PST by DeaconRed (Cold War Veteran. . . . US Army Security Agency 1964-1968)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnTiw1
Guilty!
Guilty!
Guilty! Guilty! Guilty!

GUILTY!

3 posted on 02/17/2012 12:15:50 PM PST by eCSMaster (Excommunicate heretics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnTiw1

All that other is just eyewash. They’re terrified of her because she’s of sub-Saharan African descent and every creep in the media will fly to her defense, especially if she’s guilty as sin.


4 posted on 02/17/2012 12:17:07 PM PST by BelegStrongbow (St. Joseph, patron of fathers, pray for us!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnTiw1

“Committee Chairman Jo Bonner (R-Ala.) said that all five of the panel’s Republicans, including himself, and one Democrat were taking the unusual action of recusing themselves from further involvement in the long-running Waters case “out of an abundance of caution and to avoid even an appearance of unfairness.”

You cowards!

You vile filthy, stinking, treacherous, traitorous, loathsome, reptilian RINO enemies of the Constitution and of humanity.

May demons gnaw your skulls in Hell for all eternity.

A chance to strike a blow against evil was dropped in your Ken-doll antitesticularian laps, and you pussied out.

Swine! Dogs! Maggots! Limp-wristed, pansy-assed, chicken-choking, globalist, metrosexual, John-McCain-channeling Republican in Name Only/conservative in no way whatsoever nitwits.

*********************

I would like to apologize for the way in which RINOS are represented in this post. It was never my intention to imply that RINOs are weak-kneed political time servers who are more concerned with their personal vendettas and private power struggles than with preserving our constitution and our liberties, nor to suggest at any point that they sacrifice their credibility by compromising with evil on vital matters in the mistaken impression that bipartisanship comes before the well-being of the people they supposedly represent, nor to imply at any stage that they are squabbling little toadies without an ounce of concern for the desperate situation of our republic. Nor, indeed, do I intend that readers should consider them as crabby, ulcerous little self-seeking vermin with furry legs and an excessive addiction to alcohol and certain explicit sexual practices which some people might find offensive.

I am sorry if this impression has come across.


5 posted on 02/17/2012 12:25:12 PM PST by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Voter#537

Didn’t she just say that as the most senior member of the finance comittee she wants to take Barney Franks place as head. I doubt she could have done that with ethics charges hanging over her. They are merely clearing the way.


6 posted on 02/17/2012 12:29:24 PM PST by marstegreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AnTiw1

I don’t understand how the very people chosen from within Congress to investigate and JUDGE ethics violations, have to bow out of a given case to avoid an appearance of impropriety.

There is nothing particularly partisan about the Waters case. It’s about greed and financial conflict of interest, not (say) an improper effort to beat a Republican challenger.

Someone help me out here?


7 posted on 02/17/2012 12:31:52 PM PST by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnTiw1

I honestly don’t know why this is still going on. The Constitution says it’s OK to be corrupt if you’re a democrat.


8 posted on 02/17/2012 12:31:57 PM PST by rottndog (Be Prepared for what's coming AFTER America....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dsc

Very well said - the question being do we or do we not have a Republican majority in the House of Representatives? What in the bloody hell is going on? Anyone with half a brain knows that Maxine Waters is a vile racist criminal and should be in Federal prison.


9 posted on 02/17/2012 12:32:09 PM PST by dainbramaged (I lost my mantra around 1969.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: pogo101

Simple, they didn’t want to be called racists.


10 posted on 02/17/2012 12:33:51 PM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dainbramaged

“What in the bloody hell is going on?”

It’s looking more and more like blackmail to me. With the FBI and CIA totally politicized, the demonrats probably have access to every scrap of unfavorable information—or rumor—on every pubby.


11 posted on 02/17/2012 12:41:41 PM PST by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dsc

Well said!

EODGUY


12 posted on 02/17/2012 12:42:36 PM PST by EODGUY (Hold on to your copies of the Consititution of the United States. It is going to be re-written.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AnTiw1

I’m not so sure this is cowardice. They may be so certain of a conviction that they can afford the move.


13 posted on 02/17/2012 12:45:15 PM PST by Carry_Okie (There has not been a conservative American government for 90 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnTiw1
They recused themselves because they're all scared $hitless of being accused of being racist.

Nothing but a bunch of frightened little weasels.

14 posted on 02/17/2012 12:45:23 PM PST by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnTiw1

What was that? The sound of six offshore accounts being padded. So... who earned the largest hush money.. and how does that work exactly?


15 posted on 02/17/2012 12:48:32 PM PST by momincombatboots (Back to West by G-d Virginia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnTiw1
Committee Chairman Jo Bonner (R-Ala.) said that all five of the panel’s Republicans, including himself, and one Democrat were taking the unusual action of recusing themselves from further involvement in the long-running Waters case...

Gimme a 'C'

Gimme an 'O'

Gimme a 'W'

Gimme an 'A'

Gimme an 'R'

Gimme a 'D'

Gimme an 'S'

What's that spell?

COWARDS!

What's that spell?

COWARDS!!

One more time:

COWARDS!!

16 posted on 02/17/2012 12:51:17 PM PST by WayneS (Comments now include 25% more sarcasm for no additional charge...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnTiw1

17 posted on 02/17/2012 12:58:58 PM PST by al baby (Hi Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dsc

They be blue eyed devils?


18 posted on 02/17/2012 1:01:59 PM PST by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dainbramaged

The missing, if crucial bit of information, is what did the ethics staff do that was not illegal or unethical that would yet cause everyone to recuse themselves. May we not have any of the facts the underpin the shenanigans?

Of course not...secrecy rules at the Court of King Obama.

It’s time for another party at the White House...


19 posted on 02/17/2012 1:04:45 PM PST by LachlanMinnesota (Which are you? A producer, a looter, or a moocher of wealth?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

Talk tough’
Cry
Cave

It’s the Republican way.


20 posted on 02/17/2012 1:07:14 PM PST by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: AnTiw1

Waters will die of old age before they do anything to her.


21 posted on 02/17/2012 1:07:43 PM PST by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Voter#537

We need a panel of experts to take over and decide the fate of jowls Waters and save our precious congresscritters from any undue ridicule.


22 posted on 02/17/2012 1:08:14 PM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AnTiw1

The ONLY thing that will SAVE this country is a MASSIVE ZYKLON-B gas discharge at a “State of the Union” “Speech”!


23 posted on 02/17/2012 1:11:11 PM PST by US Navy Vet (Go Packers! Go Rockies! Go Boston Bruins! See, I'm "Diverse"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marstegreg

Pefect!

She’s one of the Black Caucus members who testified in support of the heads of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac at the height of the corruption.


24 posted on 02/17/2012 1:14:37 PM PST by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AnTiw1
Hmmmm ......

Maxine Waters’ Ethics Trial Stalls. Again. (Who Is Surprised?) | July 23, 2011 | Patrick Richadson

Waters threatens to sue the House Ethics Committee for mishandling her case.

It’s notable that Waters is not asking for the case to be dismissed on the merits, but only because she claims she can no longer get a fair trial.

Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., chairman of the Financial Services Committee, said in an interview that he inserted the provision for minority banks to protect OneUnited — because it is based in his state.

The provision sought by Waters — and inserted by Frank — told the Treasury Department that it should consider — for bailout money — banks that had an asset size of $1 billion or less, and whose size dropped to a lower range because they owned devalued preferred stock in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

The only bank that language would affect was OneUnited.

Waters is accused of using her influence to gain special treatment for Massachusetts-based bank OneUnited, which received $12 million in bailout funds. Changing a law was required in order to get them the money. Her husband, former Ambassador Sidney Williams, owned more than $350,000 in stock in the bank, and had also been a board member.

Rep. Maxine Waters wants ethics charges dropped

Citing “gross misconduct,” the lawyer representing Democratic Congresswoman Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) is asking the House Ethics Committee to dismiss all charges against his client.

In a letter addressed to the chairman of the House Ethics Committee, Republican Jo Bonner of Alabama, and the committee's top Democrat, Linda Sanchez, Waters' attorney Stanley Brand cited internal documents showing a close relationship between two former committee lawyers in the case and Republican committee members, saying “any further action by the committee would be “irremediably tainted and without legal foundation.”

Rep. Waters is a senior member of the House Financial Services Committee. The committee alleges that she tried to obtain a federal bailout for a minority-owned bank where her husband is an investor.

“Based on the facts of the case and the record of committee misconduct, the only remedy that vindicates the principals of the quasi-judicial functions of the committee is immediate dismissal with prejudice. No other remedy exists to cure this misconduct,” Atty. Brand wrote.

Rep. Waters has repeatedly denied wrongdoing, saying she had no role in the Obama administration's decision to bail out Boston-based OneUnited Bank. The congresswoman's husband, Sidney Williams, owns stock in the bank, and his investment was in danger of becoming worthless during the near-financial collapse of late 2008.

OneUnited received $12 million in bailout money in December 2008. But Treasury Department officials have told House investigators that Rep. Waters was not involved in that decision.

Rep. Waters contended she had supported legislation to help all troubled, minority-owned banks like OneUnited—and specifically those, like OneUnited, that were hurt by their investments in the then-collapsing mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Atty. Brand said internal documents showed that the two former lawyers regularly corresponded exclusively last year with Rep. Bonner, then the ranking Republican and now the ethics chairman.

The two lawyers, C. Morgan Kim and Stacy Sovereign, were suspended last year by the previous Democratic chairman, Zoe Lofgren of California. Neither accepted Atty. Bonner's offer earlier this year to reinstate them.

The committee had charged Rep. Waters with violating House rules and was ready to begin a proceeding on her conduct late last year, but the case was sent back for further investigation after the controversy erupted over the conduct of the two lawyers.

Atty. Brand said in his statement that if there is prosecutorial misconduct in a criminal case, a judge would usually dismiss the charges. He also said the case was flawed.

“Given that both current members and staff are implicated in these documents, any other suggested remedy would lack legal credibility and would confirm an unprecedented level of bias against my client,” Atty. Brand added.

Meanwhile ethics watchdogs are calling on Rep. Bonner to step down as chairman of the House Ethics Committee—at least temporarily—for his role in the ongoing turmoil over Rep. Waters' case.

“I think there needs to be an investigation into the whole matter, including Mr. Bonner's role and that Mr. Bonner should step aside during the course of that investigation,” said Melanie Sloan, executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington.

“If Mr. Bonner is found to have broken the committee's rules, he should be sanctioned by the full House.”

2 House ethics attorneys suspended (includes lead attorney on Maxine Waters case)

Blake Chisam, the chief counsel and staff director for the ethics panel, initially sought to fire Kim and Sovereign on Nov. 19, but was unable to do so.

It is unclear if the decision to place Kim and Sovereign on paid leave was related to the Waters’ case or another matter, although they were placed in that status on the same day that Reps. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.) and Jo Bonner (R-Ala.), the chairwoman and ranking member of the committee, announced the Waters’ trial was delayed. The committee announced that it had new information, including e-mails from Mikael Moore, Waters' chief of staff, that would have an impact on the Waters’ matter.

.

25 posted on 02/17/2012 1:21:18 PM PST by Elle Bee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

We're also going to try to replace some of our older servers and failing equipment this year so we're going to add a little extra to our FReepathon goals. John is estimating ten to fifteen thousand to do this and I'd like to get it all in place and working before the election cycle is fully heated up, so we'll try to bring in a little more now if we can and the rest next quarter.
Jim Robinson


Click The Server To Donate

Support Activist Free Republic

26 posted on 02/17/2012 1:26:58 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnTiw1

Let’s be honest, Waters will never be convicted, or even tried. The entire DemocRat party would be implicated by doing so.


27 posted on 02/17/2012 1:31:47 PM PST by fwdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dsc

Cowards all!


28 posted on 02/17/2012 1:49:26 PM PST by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dsc

And I laugh for a full ten minutes.

Kudos to both of you.


29 posted on 02/17/2012 2:18:36 PM PST by Fishtalk (http://patfish.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AnTiw1
How come those that resigned aren't named?

How come the replacements aren't named?

Are the replacements all black so that she passes Go and collects $200?

Leni

30 posted on 02/17/2012 4:02:58 PM PST by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnTiw1

Maybe she shouldn’t have called Republicans ‘demons’.


31 posted on 02/17/2012 4:03:16 PM PST by Freddd (NoPA ngineers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

“I’m not so sure this is cowardice. They may be so certain of a conviction that they can afford the move.”

I’m inclined to believe you are correct. New members,,,, new trial. Conviction.


32 posted on 02/17/2012 4:18:16 PM PST by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: AnTiw1

Only the people who keep electing Maxine Waters are more idiotic than her.


33 posted on 02/17/2012 4:22:27 PM PST by aomagrat (Gun owners who vote for democrats are too stupid to own guns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnTiw1

Sounds like at least 6 other members of Congress need an investigation.

Are these cowards afraid of Mad Maxine pulling the inevitable race card?


34 posted on 02/17/2012 4:25:18 PM PST by hattend (Jesus wants me to make churches pay for abortions. - Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnTiw1

She gives me a big headache. She is one of those Democratic politicians who plays “musical chair” politics.


35 posted on 02/17/2012 6:01:57 PM PST by U-238
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dsc
You vile filthy, stinking, treacherous, traitorous, loathsome, reptilian RINO enemies of the Constitution and of humanity. May demons gnaw your skulls in Hell for all eternity. A chance to strike a blow against evil was dropped in your Ken-doll antitesticularian laps, and you pussied out. Swine! Dogs! Maggots! Limp-wristed, pansy-assed, chicken-choking, globalist, metrosexual, John-McCain-channeling Republican in Name Only/conservative in no way whatsoever nitwits.

Awww c'mon! Tell us how you REALLY feel! LOL

36 posted on 02/17/2012 8:13:29 PM PST by ExSoldier (Stand up and be counted... OR LINE UP AND BE NUMBERED...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dsc

I have voted against RINO Jo Bonner in the last two elections and intend to do so again this time.


37 posted on 02/17/2012 9:29:19 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: aomagrat

Waters is an old commie, but a greedy one also. Her voters don’t give a damn if she killed the Pope because they are “more idiotic” than she is.

The Oakland voter’s lament: 6 years of education gone down the drain.


38 posted on 02/17/2012 9:54:23 PM PST by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: AnTiw1

To put this idiot in front of an ethics committee makes the mistake of assuming that she has any.


39 posted on 02/17/2012 10:33:36 PM PST by ponygirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

“I have voted against RINO Jo Bonner in the last two elections and intend to do so again this time.”

Good. I wish I had a chance to vote against him.


40 posted on 02/17/2012 10:40:55 PM PST by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: AnTiw1

Shame! you have slandered doorknobs everywhere.


41 posted on 02/18/2012 5:06:02 AM PST by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnTiw1
Maxine Waters Ethics Case: 6(RINO) Committee Members Recuse Themselves

so....I suppose Kagan will recuse herself on the Obamacare case...

...BIG FRIGGIN NOT!

42 posted on 02/18/2012 5:10:47 AM PST by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnTiw1

I hope this a maneuver designed to create a new slate, and thus the ethics case goes forward and cannot be deflected by baseless charges by Waters.

Of course, that would mean that John Boehner actually had a strategy, and a spine to go forward worth it.Sure he does./s

Wow, all she had to do was call the GOP “DEMONS!” and they collapsed like a house of cards.

Oh, and did The GOP House members say ANYTHING in response?


43 posted on 02/18/2012 5:19:03 AM PST by exit82 (Democrats are the enemies of freedom. We have ideas-the Dems only have ideology.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: morphing libertarian

This is what bothers me so much about the establishment repubs, they will go along with it just so when it’s their turn she won’t say anything about them. If the new congress does not impose term limits nothing in D.C. will ever change, they’ll just find sneekier ways to do things behind our backs.


44 posted on 02/18/2012 6:37:16 AM PST by marstegreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: VideoDoctor
Nothing but a bunch of frightened little weasels.

Just protecting their own as usual.

45 posted on 02/18/2012 8:37:59 AM PST by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
The Oakland voter’s lament: 6 years of education gone down the drain.

Well, that explains Barbara Lee. I think the Left Reverend Maxine "Don't Drink the" Waters represents a district about 400 miles to the south and about 3 years fewer of edumacation on average.

46 posted on 02/18/2012 9:04:00 AM PST by ssaftler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: AnTiw1

Were I a committee member, I’d not recuse myself. I’d be proud to be part of the prosecution of this imbecile. Hell, you could call it a Kangaroo Court, a Monkey Trial, whatever the hell you want - screw the media, screw the appearance, screw her constituents. I’m done with guilt - I’m done with propriety and appearances.

As long as the result was the severest punishment possible that could be doled out by that 435 member collection of Eunichs.


47 posted on 02/18/2012 9:08:06 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson